It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by White Chapel
They actually stand to lose with the unification of Europe...
... but if there was one family with trillions of dollars someone with a legitimate journalist background would have reported on it.
the ability of the family which has founded one of the world's largest private banking dynasties to sustain their secretive fortune, which industry insiders count not in billions but in trillions, and keep it within the family.
There is absolutely no evidence that this family is involved in anything more than charitable causes and investment banking on a medium scale.
(I believe the family has even split and broken in to a couple of companies)
You have got to be joking, these people print our money. You almost had me going. I thought you were a bit slow at first, good one!!!
Originally posted by White Chapel
I posted in another thread about this but the Rothschild wealth in present day is a complete myth created by some very paranoid people. You can find an actual history of the wealth of many families at several places online that aren't full of weird shadowy conspiracies that aren't believeable or credible. They've lost a large amount of wealth over the last few decades due to some bad business dealings and nationalization in Europe. They actually stand to lose with the unification of Europe so I'm not sure why they would be behind the one world government as a previous poster has said.
Not that the richest people lists are the end all be all, but if there was one family with trillions of dollars someone with a legitimate journalist background would have reported on it. The Waltons are reported on all the time, and that's a family with a lot of wealth and lot of trusts that the wealth is stored in and it doesn't come close to what some people are accusing the Rothschild's of having.
There is absolutely no evidence that this family is involved in anything more than charitable causes and investment banking on a medium scale. They aren't even the largest firm anymore (I believe the family has even split and broken in to a couple of companies) and are controlled partially by a chinese company. Sheesh, DENY IGNORANCE people, don't embrace it anymore.
Originally posted by ConspiracyNut23
reply to post by AgentOrangeJuice
Actually David's on the list. (the OP is kind of dated, so maybe he wasn't at the time)
Here's David Rockefeller at 2.9 billion.
As to why he is listed at a mere 3 billion dollar, take a look at Norman Dodd's interview on the Reece Commission investigation of tax-exempt foundation.
Originally posted by queenkelley
3) Rothschild ordered that there was never to be "any public inventory made by the courts, or otherwise, of my estate ... Also I forbid any legal action and any publication of the value of the inheritance."
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
the rothschilds ahve enough money to buy the chinesse, american, european armed forces off the just through pure bribery paying thm more money than there whole country earns. money = power that why they arent so famouse becuase they dont want to be considering they pretty much control the price of gold, and in WW2 the funded both german and allied forces purly so they could charge up the intrest rate of what the countrys owed them very cleaver especail consider they where the ones sell both the contrys metal to build tanks and boats and guns and other items also the bank of england still have not payed them off from WW2 yet. Also the rothschilds are also very carefully who they marry by what i have been reading becuase i think they are the richest and most powerfull people in the world and to maintian that status you have to be extremly carefull like that. so they might have enough money to give every man woman child 63,000 dollars each in the whole world which would be enough to cure famin and poverty and some sufering int the world but alot of people dont understand why they dont do this. simply becuase it will create an imbalance perfect canot be perfect if evreything else is perfect becuase then it would be normal like happy cant be happy without sad once agian it creates normal. anyway i have finished going on about crap see ya P.S sorry for the crap spelling