It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by amitheone
Islam never sanctioned them and later on it came later?? Islam never sanctioned the use of prayer beads, but later on, used it, but it doesn't mean it's pagan practice. Contradictory my friend. Its like I was never a smoker, but today, I smoke. But that doesn't mean I'm a smoker.
Sorry, pal, you need to do better than that. It is not at all satisfactory. I give you an "F". Shame on you.
Originally posted by amitheone
Well, its either you accept the evidences or just turn a blind eye on it. Its your choice.
Islam is pagan.
Show evidences then its not. No need to explain. Just make a commentary on the evidences to show Islam is not pagan, if you have any evidences at all to show.
Originally posted by babloyi
Btw, are you trying to connect Islam to the anti-christ by claiming Islam is pagan? Because even if you believed so, there are many more candidates for the antichrist than Islam.
[edit on 4-8-2008 by babloyi]
Originally posted by heliosprime
How about the FACT that those who leave islam are to be killed.........or those who do not accept islam "are to be killed"................
You can't give me an "F", I am a lawyer, damnit, your mixing metaphors!
And you are using faulty logic too: "Islam never sanctioned the use of prayer beads, but later on, used it". Islam is not a person. It is a fixed thing. PEOPLE used prayer beads, but Islam never sanctioned their use. Same as PEOPLE used the crucifix as a Christian symbol, had sabbath on Sunday, and worshipped Jesus Christ. Just because PEOPLE did it, doesn't mean it is the true message.
Originally posted by amitheone
Whatever you say, pal. So, Muslims can do whatever they want, follow repeated prayers like the pagans, construct a pagan satanic symbol on top of the mosque, and etc. Hey, Islam never sanctioned the use of this, blame the imams who taught the doctrines of the pagans. Islam is clean. Islam is not pagan at all. The people practices paganism, but that does not mean that Islam is pagan. But, its very much ok to practice paganism.
Originally posted by babloyi
But...whatever. It seems you are more similar to heliosprime than I expected. When brought evidence that disproves your view, you just say "You just don't understand, you're wrong!" instead of debating those facts.
Originally posted by babloyi
- You claimed that I am sliding past the issue that (some ) Christians believe that Jesus was the (son of/) God. I explained it outright. Islam does not accept this position. I am not sliding past anything.
- You brought up the issue of YHVH vs YHWH, and I addressed this also.
- Then you brought up a false Hadith, which I addressed also.
I'm not sure if you realise this, but unless you can back these statements up, they're not really worth much. Instead of providing reasoning or evidence, however, you spent your time doing personal attacks. In the span of 3 pages I have been called an anti-christ, a user of 'double-speak', 'he who is made of "teflon" he who ducks all' , "master of deception" (that one is my favourite) and finally "a lawyer who works for CAIR(???)".
It seems pretty clear where the misdirection is coming from, here.
[edit on 5-8-2008 by babloyi]
Originally posted by heliosprime
As a lawyer do you work for CAIR? It sounds as if you do..............
Originally posted by babloyi
I am not a lawyer. In case you didn't notice, it was a joke. A little play-acting between me and amitheone (involving numbered evidences, use of 'your honour', etc).
Originally posted by babloyi
I didn't answer what question? Are you grasping at straws now?
Originally posted by heliosprime
As a lawyer do you work for CAIR? It sounds as if you do..............
Originally posted by babloyi
I am not a lawyer. In case you didn't notice, it was a joke. A little play-acting between me and amitheone (involving numbered evidences, use of 'your honour', etc).
What links did you provide that disproved my position? I responded to every link you posted, unless you had posted it before, and I had responded to it in another thread.