I have seen a story about a German engineer that had a theory worked out on computer about how they built the pyramids from the inside out.

Very interesting and looked easy, and now with this the build have should be even easier.

I would point out that no one in the mainstream has every denied that the Giza pyramids were not piers!

Hawass has avoided that subject also.

Lerner turns pale when the theme is discussed.

This would explain the boats buried next to them and the Sphinx, obvious a God's "rubber duck" that sank and fossilized.

But but the naysayers and debunkers will say, the pyramids are made of limestone - a poor material for building in water. I would respond - open your minds.

Elder Inla of the Southern Hekawi Indians has proclaimed the Giza Pyramids to be piers. In his vision quest he came apon a dead bird floating on a sea of stale beer, then on the horizon Sirius rose into the sky and all was clear.

This was the proof he needed.

He is now making his vision available to all.

See what we have in store for 2012 - the pier will have a "ship" tie up to it once again bringing in a new era of light and cheap desserts.

Get wisdon, $39.95 for the DVD set and for a mere 124.75 a special DVD set, the expanded version that the elder once sat on.

Originally posted by Hanslune
I then claim the origination of a new Gizapyramid theory. That in light of this formerly suppressed and undeniably true information that the pyramids where in fact, not tombs, but very unsuccessful pier pilings.

I am glad te see that you finally agree that pyramids where in fact, not tombs.

No joke - on that part. Space visitor I've forgotten your position although you screen name is a clue. Could you tell me hear or point to the thread that outlines what you think about the pyramids?