It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EverythingYouDespise
Originally posted by whiteraven
Now this smacks of socialism.
Yet it does raise a question of fundemental importance concerning the times we now live in.
Would you consider Food and Water a Human right in line with say, the Right to Bear arms?
Or in line with the Right to Pursue Happiness?
Can a person have the right of the pursuit of happyness if he is hungery and thirsty?
The problem with this question is that there is no such thing as a guaranteed natural human right, and we're much better off as a species because of this. Sure, some nations may grant their citizens certain rights (and, in doing so, I say that they are admitting that they are withholding our natural freedoms by setting limits - but that's a different subject), but nothing is universal.
Remember, everything has to come from somewhere. These resources are not unlimited. Would you give up your valuable supplies in order to feed someone who did not work to earn their own? If a person, for whatever reason, happens to live in a place where food or water is not attainable and they do not possess the wealth, or mental or physical capacity to obtain these goods, they deserve to die. Human beings are the only creatures on the planet foolish enough to even attempt to preserve their weakest and least adaptable members and allow them to breed. In the long run, this will prove to be our downfall.
[edit on 8-8-2008 by EverythingYouDespise]
most here are from the richest country in the world so find some compassion and look outside your little boxes once in awhile. there is a wide world out their and many people on it are dying of starvation amongst other unecessary means.
firstly, i dont want to turn this into a slag off Bush session though do you really think giving assistance so quickly to the tsunami was heroic of him? what about to the katrina victims? still heroic?
bush=compassion. dont think so. and in regards to the U.S giving as much as other countries...
this thread is about poor, starving people in a third world country. the U.S is not a 3rd world country so you cant make comparisons.
originally posted by: Mad_Hatter
Do you consider the air you breathe a human right?
originally posted by: JohnPhoenix
Food water shelter and clothing should all be human rights and all should be 100% FREE
originally posted by: FlyersFan
Food and water are controlled commodities for the most part.
People have a right to them ... if they can earn them.
That's the way the world is.
If a person wants it differently, then the entire planet must
come under ONE WORLD ORDER and everyone work for the
collective.
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
Is a picture worth a thousand words? Here's one...
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
Is a picture worth a thousand words? Here's one...
Actually .. it doesn't answer the question at all.
Try again.
Are food and water a human right?
Right now they are commodities. But should they be a right?
And if they are a 'right' ... then how is that achieved?
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: JohnPhoenix
Food water shelter and clothing should all be human rights and all should be 100% FREE
You have to pay someone to make the clothing and to grow the food and make the shelter. Otherwise, those people are working for nothing and are slaves.
Either that, or we have to have one big ONE WORLD ORDER collective.
Your choice. Which is better?
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
Any need for further explanation simply proves my point.
originally posted by: JohnPhoenix
No you don't HAVE to pay anyone. That's just silly.