It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ZindoDoone
That spot of oil you see floating, if it came from an oil rig it would be black and thick like putty. Crude oil from a rig off shore would not look like that. Thats from some fool who doesn't take care of his yacht or power boat. Nice try!
Originally posted by iamcamouflage
So you try to say that we have all this infrastructure in place to see oil in 2 months,
Its some suedo-reality show, about drilling for oil... no biggie right, until you find out that it took them 55 Days, from the start of drilling to when they had thier first barrel of oil...
Originally posted by iamcamouflage
reply to post by TKainZero
Its some suedo-reality show, about drilling for oil... no biggie right, until you find out that it took them 55 Days, from the start of drilling to when they had thier first barrel of oil...
I realize you are not claiming it to be science but this does not include, a)finding the oil b) determining the logistics/engineering for building the platform c)actually building the platform and d)pumping the oil.
Did you see my math on this coastal and ANWR oil? Not counting the Green River Shale oil, we will only get a four year supply from all the oil on the coasts and in ANWR. Honestly you think that is worth it?
Daewoo Oil Platform
This article is from 2007 and says it will be 2011 before the platform will be delivered. Roughly 4 years to build a platform.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
This oil drop in my mind is just lip service.
Originally posted by Rook1545
It might...eventually.
There are somethings that need to be considered. First off is timeframe. I have been listening to some pretty conservative guys on the radio lately, and they seem to have absolutely no clue. They are all for drilling NOW, and think it will bring down gas prices tomorrow. Here is a quick list of considerations:
1. Refining. This is critical. Once you get the oil out you need to refine it into gas. New ones would have to be built. This takes time, alot of time. I have worked oilfield and have seen how long it takes to build these, you are looking at probably at least 7 years from the start of planning to having refined gas.
People might say "well what about the refineries we have?" They are pretty much at max capacity. It really doesn't make sense to have a huge monster gas factory running 24/7 and only run it at 60-80% capacity, that is wasting money, alot of it. This is probably why the oil companies are sitting on alot of their leases, no place to put the oil after getting it out of the ground.
2. Upgrading. When you pull the oil out of the ground it is not ready to go into the refinery. Depending on the field it could have quite a bit of sediment and water in it, that needs to get taken out. The mid-line facilities to remove this take about 2 years to build from planning to shipping. That is fine it fits in the timeframe to build the refineries.
3. Labour. Where are you going to get all of the people to do the drilling and the building and running of this stuff? Sure there are quite a few people out of jobs that could use the work, but there is the training required. That is fine though again it fits into the timeframe for the refinery.
Now you could go ahead and drill the oil and have someone else refine it for you...but that leaves you in the exact same situation you are in right now. The companies drill the oil, sell it to another company to refine it, then buy it back at a higher price. Might work until the refineries are done, but doesn't solve anything in the mean time. I think for the drill now to work they would have had to have started on it quite a while ago.
Originally posted by Solo954
reply to post by Rook1545
So if we were to drill crude oil, I understand that 90 percent is good and the other 10 percent of crude is waste. Where would we dump out that 10 percent?
Originally posted by ZindoDoone
Bacterial polution does not come from crude.
Twice an Exxon Valdez spill worth of oil seeps into the Gulf of Mexico every year, according to a new study that will be presented January 27 at the Ocean Sciences Meeting in San Antonio, Texas.
But the oil isn't destroying habitats or wiping out ocean life. The ooze is a natural phenomena that's been going on for many thousands of years, according to Roger Mitchell, Vice President of Program Development at the Earth Satellite Corporation (EarthSat) in Rockville Md. "The wildlife have adapted and evolved and have no problem dealing with the oil," he said.
Oil that finds its way to the surface from natural seeps get broken down by bacteria and ends up as carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas.