'Two Gays Only Count as One Parent, Therefore they shouldn't be able to adopt':McCain, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times


reply posted on 15-7-2008 @ 05:47 PM by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by DimensionalDetective



The good news is that he's already changing his mind.

Source


But now he's backing off that stance with a statement sent to Andrew Sullivan from Jill Hazelbaker, McCain's Director of Communications:
...
McCain could have been clearer in the interview in stating that his position on gay adoption is that it is a state issue, just as he made it clear in the interview that marriage is a state issue. He was not endorsing any federal legislation.

McCain's expressed his personal preference for children to be raised by a mother and a father wherever possible. However, as an adoptive father himself, McCain believes children deserve loving and caring home environments, and he recognizes that there are many abandoned children who have yet to find homes. McCain believes that in those situations that caring parental figures are better for the child than the alternative.


It won't be long till he's marching in the gay parents' parade.


reply posted on 15-7-2008 @ 05:49 PM by optimus primal
reply to post by LLoyd45



indeed kids are cruel. and to a point that's natural, every kid has to deal with it. it's what makes us who we are as an adult, how we deal with that cruelty that is. i was made fun of for having a poor single mother, does that mean no one who is poor or single should have a child? how about fat parents? should they be kept from having a child? what about parents with one arm? or parents who are deformed from an accident or war? what about parents who at the age of 40 or older still play video games? if we're going to base who can have children off of how they're children(adopted or otherwise) are going to be treated by the local bully kids, not many kids are going to be born or have homes.


reply posted on 15-7-2008 @ 05:50 PM by optimus primal
reply to post by Andrew E. Wiggin



wow lol, while i was posting you posted the same thing basically. arg darn logical thinking!


reply posted on 15-7-2008 @ 05:53 PM by optimus primal
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic



isn't that the best political tactic ever?! "i'll just say the exact opposite of something i said that was controversial and claim i'm clarifying my position. nevermind the fact that the two view are almost mutually exclusive."


reply posted on 15-7-2008 @ 06:11 PM by ghaleon12
Here's a good video I saw recently looking into the topic. One of the biggest reasons for supporting this are the number of kids/teens that never find a permanent home. I couldn't imagine not having help when I turned 18 and went to college.

www.hulu.com...

"I strongly am against gay adoption. The kid should not have to go through that."

That's fine but many kids, like it shows in the video, would do anything to have two loving parents. Older teens have very little hope of finding a home, that would be hard to go through.

[edit on 15-7-2008 by ghaleon12]



reply posted on 15-7-2008 @ 06:11 PM by optimus primal
Originally posted by forsakenwayfarer
Originally posted by bobafett
I was raised by lesbians and I don't think it was really a good thing, I was left quite confused, and got heavily bullied over it. Of course I got over all that in the end, but really, that part of my childhood is not the good memories.



Which is, truthfully and from a REALIST view, is why we should not allow gay couples to have children. People, especially kids, cannot be reasonable. Cannot be considerate.
These people will not change, atleast not any time soon. Gay couples will rationalize this away, but it will not change the fact that it will always be a hurtful situation for any child. Children cannot understand why they are being bullied and stared at. Adults may be able to happily live their lives with such stigma. Children end up scarred.


and who's responsible for that stigma?? is it the gay parents? hardly. it's society as a whole. maybe a little more effort should be put into getting rid of that stigma, than telling people they aren't good enough to be parents because they're kid will get teased.
when i was a young kid, not that many years ago, i'd say 95-98% of all the kids i knew came in contact with were bullied at one point or another, or even for most of their young lives, because they were poor, or they liked the wrong thing...so on and so forth. it's part of growing up. always has been. to deny a child a loving home because they might get teased by other children for their "weird parents" is rediculous. i didn't understand why i was being bullied for being poor, and having no dad around. hasn't stopped me from leading a healthy adult life with my wife. denying a child a loving home, because of all that is tantamount to child abuse itself. " you can't live with them because you'll get teased. they may love you and provide for everything you need, but childhood bullying is more important" sickening really.


reply posted on 15-7-2008 @ 06:19 PM by Griff
reply to post by forsakenwayfarer



How are these kids any different?

Except that at least the poster raised by lesbians said they got over the ridicule, these fat kids will have to live with being fat the rest of their lives. And probably die early.

CHILD obesity has raised its chubby cheeks again with today's suggestion that fat kids should be treated as neglect cases.
OK, on the face of it sounds ideal.

Sights such as the one pictured on this page or six-year-old Dzhambulat Khatokhov, who stands 4ft 7in (1.4m) tall and weighs 15 stone (95kg) repulse us all so someone must be to blame.

Surely their parents should be punished for allowing them to get into this state? After all there is some of childhood being robbed if being unable to take part in games, no doubt being ridiculed and bullied at school and having a butt which is, well the butt, of all jokes is not something anyone would surely want for their little darling.


blogs.manchestereveningnews.co.uk...


reply posted on 15-7-2008 @ 06:22 PM by optimus primal
reply to post by LLoyd45



as a matter of fact, no i wouldn't have preferred it to have been different, it made me the person i am today. made me a strong person. my mother's attitude towards life and perservering without having to rely on someone else really made a large impact on me and taught me what it is to be strong, what it means to go forward in the face of difficulties. that's what parents do, teach you to live in a world that isn't always going to accept you for who you are, and to be proud that you did your best even if other people ridicule you.

i would submit to you that denying a couple a child because of their looks is the same thing as denying a homosexual couple a child. they're both rediculous reasons. you can't stop childhood bullying, and you can't base who gets to have kids off of it either. the very idea is sickeningly ignorant.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^