It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"Conspiracy theories in general and 9/11 conspiracies in particular are not logical, so debating with folks who believe in them is usually pointless and leads to a lot of yelling. It's better to just find the root mistake, point it out for everyone, and let it go." - R. Mackey 12JULY08
"There's a fine line in the Scientific Method, one that you have crossed. I refer to the fine line between refining a hypothesis and making excuses." - R. Mackey 06FEB07
All you do is attack ATS and its members for researching and trying to engage in a rational mature converstaion about the topic at hand.
Divide and Conquer: History and Purpose
Why do people attack each other? There are several reasons and many attack with deliberate intent. In fact, there can be ulterior motives for divisive behavior. Historically, Divide and conquer was an intentional strategy used by the OSS during World War II:[3]
“Psychological warfare, as the term is used by the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff ... comprises all moral and physical means other than orthodox military operations which tend to destroy the will and ability of the enemy to resist, to deprive him of support of allies or neutrals and to increase in our own troops and allies the will to victory. The implements of psychological warfare are: open propaganda, subversion, special operations (sabotage, guerrilla warfare, espionage), political and cultural pressures, economic pressures. The principal effects sought are persuasion, sympathy, terrorization, confusion, division and physical interference.”[4]
Originally posted by SlightlyAbovePar
"Conspiracy theories in general and 9/11 conspiracies in particular are not logical, so debating with folks who believe in them is usually pointless
(1) Do you believe John Lear, Craig Ranke and others are - in your words, not mine - accomplices to murder?
-OR-
(2) Do you now retract that statement thereby rendering your entire (Inflationary Model) comment/argument moot?
Originally posted by SlightlyAbovePar
Argument from personal belief and an argumentative fallacy.
If you want to debate your nebulous ideas around how I "just can't cope with reality" please start a thread, present your ideas and I will discuss it with you there.
You are engaging in another popular conspiracy fallacy: deflection.
The issues, in this thread, are Irreducible Delusions and the Inflation Model. Do you have any thing of substance to add to the discussion concerning these two theories?
If you have an issue with one, or the other (both?) theories, lets discuss it. If your intention is to continue the delusion of deflection, please do it elsewhere.
[edit on 14-7-2008 by SlightlyAbovePar]
Originally posted by SlightlyAbovePar
Argument from personal belief and an argumentative fallacy.
You are engaging in another popular conspiracy fallacy: deflection.
The issues, in this thread, are Irreducible Delusions and the Inflation Model. Do you have any thing of substance to add to the discussion concerning these two theories?
"Conspiracy theories in general and 9/11 conspiracies in particular are not logical, so debating with folks who believe in them is usually pointless and leads to a lot of yelling."
-ryan 'gravy' mackey, NASA shill