MadS,
Yes, been to the site...
The fact is, and it's not a to hard one to understand...
It is MORE effective to destroy your target, whatever it may be with the LEAST amount of shot's as possible. Not the most. That is way to costly in a
wartime situation. It is a gun, a weapon. I know it serves other application's, but when used as a weapon for war it is not efficient.
Why am I fixated on this one weapon? Well... Seem's to me, that this is the one discussed in here. The reason why FM was awarded the moron award...
Have you forgotten that, or am I wrong to discuss this here?
BTW, it is a logical argument... Maybe you just can't get past your own opinion to see that...
William,
I don't see how effective it would be shooting down a cruise missle... We have missle's that travel faster then bullet's...Why not use those
instead? Also, we're developing laser weapon's for this purpose as well. They are alot more efficient, in one shot than a million shot's....
Kano,
"I have no idea where you got the idea this was a sniper weapon from" ...
I never said it was a sniper weapon...or thought it. I was using the whole sniper thing as an example...
My whole reason for posting, was because I aggree with FM, that this weapon serve's no usefull military application. It doesn't take a great mind to
realize, if your gonna destroy something, destroy with the least amount of ammo....


