It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
"The United States is in the midst of one of the largest military buildups in history," wrote Joseph Cirincione, president of the Ploughshares Fund, in the May issue of Foreign Policy. "And it is against a threat that is disappearing -- fast."
Under George W. Bush's plan, the U.S. "would spend more than $60 billion on missile defence in the next six years, an unprecedented sum, even for the Pentagon," Cirincione wrote. And it would do this despite the fact that "there are far fewer missiles, missile programs, and hostile states with missiles aimed at the United States and its armed forces than there were 20 years ago. ...
Most of the 28 countries that have any ballistic missiles at all have only short-range Scud missiles -- which travel less than 300 miles and are growing older and less reliable each day. Even the number of countries trying to develop ballistic missiles is falling."
So why are Europeans supposed to worry about Iran launching a missile or two their way? Iranian officials who survived the retaliatory bombardment would find themselves on trial in The Hague. Which is a bit of a deterrent, one would think.
www.canada.com...
Originally posted by Keyhole
So there is less of a threat from missles now then there was 20 years ago!
lets have a good look and see what its really for - 12 icbm is 96 warheads , so thats 96 fewer targets that would be killed.
Originally posted by Keyhole
The article says 28 countries have ballistic missle capabilities and the website above claims there are 35 countries, doesn't seem like they did their homework very well.
Just doesn't seem right!
[edit on 7/13/2008 by Keyhole]
Originally posted by centurion1211
What? "Only" 28 countries (instead of 35) that could send a ballistic missile towards the U.S. isn't a good reason for having a missile defense?
Originally posted by Harlequin
reply to post by FredT
missiles based in poland have the ability to engage russian icbm fields - since those are within the arc and travel range it could engage from - in the boost phase.
lets have a good look and see what its really for - 12 icbm is 96 warheads , so thats 96 fewer targets that would be killed.
google maps link
a little jiggery needed but move the map till you see the UK on the left then click ` show labels`
poland *should* be in the middle and all those `dots` in russia to the right are the icbm fields
so tell me again what those missiles would be for
[edit on 14/7/08 by Harlequin]