It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jam321
Remember 9/11....Were all you guys sympathetic to all of these terrorist right after 9/11...
Majority of Americans wanted revenge big time and had cruel ideas how they wanted to do it.
I don't justify Bush actions but then again I will never know how many lives were saved because of the information the government received.
It wasn't till the anti-war thing started that people started bringing up torture and everything else. We don't have the pressure of trying to decide how to best protect our Nation. All we can do is guess and play Monday morning quarterback.
Firstly, are you saying that 100% of America was pro-war at some point? Also I strongly doubt that most people even that support the current occupation of Iraq would call themselves "pro-war." I cannot speak for them, but I would guess that they felt this invasion was needed and felt the correct course of action was taken. "Pro-war" gives the connotation that war is consistently desired by those taking the label.
Originally posted by dariousg
And for those Pro-Bush people on this site. Ask yourselves this: Why would this president need to have a bill like this passed if he and his administration were innocent of WAR CRIMES?
Originally posted by jam321
Remember 9/11....Were all you guys sympathetic to all of these terrorist right after 9/11... Majority of Americans wanted revenge big time and had cruel ideas how they wanted to do it. I don't justify Bush actions but then again I will never know how many lives were saved because of the information the government received. I will never know what barbaric things these terrorist had committed in the past. I will never know many things because a lot has to do with National security. All I know is that after 9/11 Americans wanted the blood of those responsible. It wasn't till the anti-war thing started that people started bringing up torture and everything else. We don't have the pressure of trying to decide how to best protect our Nation. All we can do is guess and play Monday morning quarterback.
Originally posted by jsobecky
reply to post by dariousg
Originally posted by dariousg
And for those Pro-Bush people on this site. Ask yourselves this: Why would this president need to have a bill like this passed if he and his administration were innocent of WAR CRIMES?
It's not a good idea to frame a question like that, since it implies that anyone who attempts to answer you is "Pro-Bush".
However...
Maybe to ward off costly and malicious litigation?
In every war, there are accusations of war crimes. The international community can try someone in absentia, but they cannot come onshore and extradite those it accuses.
Originally posted by DimensionalDetective
Found the direct embed on youtube. Everyone should listen to what Jonathon Turley has to say about this. This guy is a constitutional lawyer and an expert. He basically says that the administration has hired crooked lawyers and shills who will cook up any amendments and their "own takes" on what is and is not legal...
Worries About War Crimes Heat up in The Whitehouse
So hot is the speculation that war-crimes trials will eventually follow in foreign or international courts that Lawrence Wilkerson, Colin Powell's former chief of staff, has publicly advised Mr. Feith, Mr. Addington and Alberto Gonzales, among others, to "never travel outside the U.S., except perhaps to Saudi Arabia and Israel."
Originally posted by jsobecky
Is there another source for this "story"?
I'd like to know which "Red Cross" said this. Was it the American Red Cross? Or the very biased International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement?
Red Cross investigators concluded last year in a secret report that the Central Intelligence Agency’s interrogation methods for high-level Qaeda prisoners constituted torture and could make the Bush administration officials who approved them guilty of war crimes, according to a new book on counterterrorism efforts since 2001.
The book says that the International Committee of the Red Cross declared in the report, given to the C.I.A. last year, that the methods used on Abu Zubaydah, the first major Qaeda figure the United States captured, were “categorically” torture, which is illegal under both American and international law.
Bernard Barrett of the International Committee of the Red Cross declined to comment on the book except to say that the committee “regrets that any information has been attributed to us” because it believes its work is more effective when confidential.
He did confirm that committee personnel “are regularly visiting” the high-level Qaeda prisoners, now at Guantánamo Bay. "We have an ongoing confidential dialogue with members of the U.S. intelligence community, and we would share any observations or recommendations with them.”
*****SKIP*****
Ms. Mayer acknowledges that Red Cross investigators based their account largely on interviews with the prisoners. But she writes that several C.I.A. officers she spoke with confirmed parts of the Red Cross description.
The American Red Cross accomplishes this goal by working within the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement—the world’s largest humanitarian network with more than 180 Red Cross and Red Crescent national societies and more than 100 million volunteers. In all our work, we abide by the seven fundamental principles: humanity, impartiality, neutrality, independence, voluntary service, unity, and universality.
Originally posted by niteboy82
Originally posted by jam321
And there lies the problem with revenge, or as I prefer to call it "bloodlust." I don't know why we would even want to remember the hateful feelings we felt, times like that shows humanity at its lowest. I prefer to look at the cause and fix it, instead of politically coating it to my preference and then running amok with it.
We want to remember because there are people that are out to destroy America because they hate what we represent. We want to remember because those People who died on 9/11 did not asked to be killed. And since you like to look at the cause and fix, tell me what is the cause and what is your solution? I don't coat anything, coating is when you prefer not to remember and act like there is really no entity out there to get us. When in reality there is danger all around. Yes, we are probably to blame for a lot of that danger that confronts us but some of it is based on a difference of ideology. They believe we should live one way and we prefer to live the American way. There is no better way. Hoorah!!!!!!
Firstly, are you saying that 100% of America was pro-war at some point? Also I strongly doubt that most people even that support the current occupation of Iraq would call themselves "pro-war." I cannot speak for them, but I would guess that they felt this invasion was needed and felt the correct course of action was taken. "Pro-war" gives the connotation that war is consistently desired by those taking the label.
Majority wanted action taken. I will agree that people support the troops, not necessarily the war. I never said everybody was pro-war.
sorry messed up on quote and everything got mixed together.
[edit on 14-7-2008 by jam321]
[edit on 14-7-2008 by jam321]