More questions on the legality of John McCain as US President! Obama is eligible as he was born in Hawaii, but McCain's birth in the Panama Canal
zone is causing problems.
John McCain
IS a US citizen, that has not been in doubt. The question is whether or not he is classified as a 'natural born citizen'.

Title 8 of the U.S. Code Section 1401 defines the following as people who are "citizens of the United States at birth:"
Anyone born inside the United States
Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person's status as a citizen of the tribe
Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S.
national
Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age
21
Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for
at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
Does John McCain fit all of the above credentials?

The analysis, by Prof. Gabriel J. Chin, focused on a 1937 law that has been largely overlooked in the debate over Mr. McCain’s eligibility to be
president. The law conferred citizenship on children of American parents born in the Canal Zone after 1904, and it made John McCain a citizen just
before his first birthday. But the law came too late, Professor Chin argued, to make Mr. McCain a natural-born citizen.
There are, Professor Chin argued in his analysis, only two ways to become a natural-born citizen. One, specified in the Constitution, is to be born in
the United States. The other way is to be covered by a law enacted by Congress at the time of one’s birth.
Professor Chin wrote that simply being born in the Canal Zone did not satisfy the 14th Amendment, which says that “all persons born or naturalized
in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.”
A series of early-20th-century decisions known as the Insular Cases, he wrote, ruled that unincorporated territories acquired by the United States
were not part of the nation for constitutional purposes. The Insular Cases did not directly address the Canal Zone. But the zone was generally
considered an unincorporated territory before it was returned to Panama in 1999, and some people born in the Canal Zone when it was under American
jurisdiction have been deported from the United States or convicted of being here illegally.
Interesting that Panama was not mentioned in these cases, but it seems it was not considered 'incorporated' (or part of the United States).

In April, the Senate approved a nonbinding resolution declaring that Mr. McCain is eligible to be president. Its sponsors said the nation’s
founders would have never intended to deny the presidency to the offspring of military personnel stationed out of the country.
Perhaps regardless of Constitutional law, which trumps every resolution Congress can make, McCain may be able eligible for President.
Even though McCain is a US citizen, is he really a natural born US citizen?
www.nytimes.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
[edit on 7/11/2008 by biggie smalls]