It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Russia must punish states hosting U.S. missile shield - analyst

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 11 2008 @ 06:55 AM
link   

Russia must punish states hosting U.S. missile shield - analyst


en.rian.ru

MOSCOW, July 9 (RIA Novosti) - Russia must use economic and political means, and military ties with Asia, to punish European states that agree to host U.S. missile defense elements, a Russian political analyst said on Wednesday.

Commenting on a U.S.-Czech deal signed on Tuesday on deploying a missile tracking radar, Col. Gen. Leonid Ivashov, the head of the Moscow-based Academy of Geopolitical Sciences, said: "Russia should not limit itself to statements. We must have a plan, adopted by the Russian Security Council, setting out measures on the economic, political and military cooperation levels."
(visit the link for the full news article)




posted on Jul, 11 2008 @ 06:55 AM
link   
Got to agree with Ivanshov , as the US ABM could be ballistic missiles disguised as long range interceptors .

en.rian.ru
(visit the link for the full news article)



posted on Jul, 11 2008 @ 06:59 AM
link   
In a world where there are McDonald's in Moscow and half of europe buys russian energy, all this makes no sense. It's just troublemaking politicians stirring up hornets nests so they can keep populations polarized.

How about everyone stfu and continue with their own lives instead of wasting time posturing over the millionth new weopons system the permanent war economy spits out?



posted on Jul, 11 2008 @ 08:04 AM
link   
as i said elsewhere:

The premise that the missiles are there to protect from Iranian missiles is utter rubbish since the range of the shahab3 covers

kazakstan, russia, ukraine , molodva,romania, bulgaria and some greek islands *maybe crete*

and thats as far north as it goes.

the thread

www.abovetopsecret.com...

covers the range of the `best` iranian missile.

so what use are missiles when its 530 miles from warsaw to bucharest?

poland have caught on to the game the USA want to play and don`t want any of it.



posted on Jul, 11 2008 @ 08:53 AM
link   
Hey, if folks want missle defense systems, they buy them.

If it were a Russian/French/UK/India/China missle defense system I am sure then it would be fine.

It could be a disguised offensive missle....sure....it could be a empty shell and not operate at all.....but it looks cool in the front yard and you neighbors will worry anyway.



posted on Jul, 11 2008 @ 11:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by Harlequin
as i said elsewhere:

The premise that the missiles are there to protect from Iranian missiles is utter rubbish since the range of the shahab3 covers

kazakstan, russia, ukraine , molodva,romania, bulgaria and some greek islands *maybe crete*

and thats as far north as it goes.

the thread

www.abovetopsecret.com...

covers the range of the `best` iranian missile.

so what use are missiles when its 530 miles from warsaw to bucharest?

poland have caught on to the game the USA want to play and don`t want any of it.


got to agree with you , what do you think could it trigger something like the cuban missile crisis????????????????



new topics

top topics
 
1

log in

join