It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There are several conclusions that the authors have reached with this report and its supporting analysis. The first and primary conclusion is that there was definitely a real and physical object that appeared and was witnessed on January 8, 2008, in the Dublin-Stephenville area.[...]
The likelihood that all of these witnesses miss-identified separate known objects at different times, in different but closely associated geographic locations, all within a 3 1/2 hour time period is extremely low. It is much more reasonable to believe that these witnesses truly saw an object that could not be explained by any objects with which they are familiar.[...]
As to what these witnesses saw, it is difficult to determine. It was not any known aircraft.[...]
The authors cannot comment on the source or origin of this object, but it is clear to the authors that the unknown object was real and not imaginary.[...]
The second conclusion of this report is that the military did not react overtly to the presence of these unknown objects. In light of the disaster of Sept. 11, 2001, the authors of this report have concerns with how the military reacted to an unknown aircraft(s) in U.S. air space. It is clear that there was an unknown object without any transponder beacon traveling along a path that began south of Dublin and that proceeded on a direct path to Crawford Ranch. This object was tracked by the FTW radar for over an hour. Military jets flew within a mile of this object on their way to the Brownwood MOA. The F-16s had to have seen this object on their radar and the suspected AWACS that was circling this area must have detected and recorded this object on its state-of-the-art radar. This must have raised concerns, yet the radar tracks of the military jets, indicates that there were no reaction by them to this object during the hour of time in question. What could explain this lack of reaction? One possibility is that the military knew the identity of the object and instructed the F-16 pilots to ignore and stay on course to the MOA. But this possibility is countered by all of the military replies to the FOIAs that indicated that the military had no aircraft in the area other than the F-16s from CAFB that have already been identified. Secondly, if it was a military aircraft then it was violating FAA and military MARSA rules by not having a transponder beacon code activated while being outside of a MOA. This leaves us with the possibility that the military either did not see the object or just ignored it. In light of what happened on 9/11, what if the unknown object had been a terrorist aircraft? The Air Force should explain what their radar detected on the evening of January 8, 2008, and the reason as to why the military jets in the area did not react.
The third conclusion is that military aircraft traffic in the area was unusually heavy and twice military aircraft strayed out of their standard Military Training Routes and into civilian airspace.[...]
The last conclusion is that there are indications that requests submitted under the Freedom of Information Act are not considered seriously by the U.S. military and were completely ignored by the Dept of Homeland Security's branch, U.S. Customs & Border Patrol.
Originally posted by LateApexer313..........I doubt we've been able to leap-frog to such an advanced rate as what is purportedly on the radar data they have obtained compared to what is now already in use.
Originally posted by Shhmeat
It's been more than 100 years since first manned flight. Don't be surprised like a cavemen if you see a 500ft long hovering silent craft.
Originally posted by danx
Originally posted by Shhmeat
It's been more than 100 years since first manned flight. Don't be surprised like a cavemen if you see a 500ft long hovering silent craft.
I find it funny that debunkers and pseudo-skeptics always ask for proof when people speak of aliens or think that what they saw wasn't from this world, but never substantiate their own claims that it's not alien.
Where's your proof that it's terrestrial? You don't have any. In the long run you only believe it's terrestrial. So you're basically in the same position as the the UFO crazies as you called them.
Originally posted by Shhmeat
Occam's razor folks. Occam's razor.
So what makes you think aliens are dumb enough to travel such vast distances to see such 'primitive' life forms?
Military industrial complex existance has been proven with no doubt. It's there.
ETs existance : blurry photos, tall stories, hoaxes, scams, lies, snake oils schems, fictional dvd and books and hoaxes and hoaxes and hoaxes.
Originally posted by danx
I think some people in this (and other threads) are speaking about and attributing things to the report's authors that they did not say.
Anyway, here's the summary of the 4 conclusions in the report, that will hopefully make some people more informed and stop them from posting false information:
The likelihood that all of these witnesses miss-identified separate known objects at different times, in different but closely associated geographic locations, all within a 3 1/2 hour time period is extremely low. It is much more reasonable to believe that these witnesses truly saw an object that could not be explained by any objects with which they are familiar.[...]
As to what these witnesses saw, it is difficult to determine. It was not any known aircraft.[...]
The authors cannot comment on the source or origin of this object, but it is clear to the authors that the unknown object was real and not imaginary.[...]
The second conclusion of this report is that the military did not react overtly to the presence of these unknown objects. In light of the disaster of Sept. 11, 2001, the authors of this report have concerns with how the military reacted to an unknown aircraft(s) in U.S. air space. It is clear that there was an unknown object without any transponder beacon traveling along a path that began south of Dublin and that proceeded on a direct path to Crawford Ranch. This object was tracked by the FTW radar for over an hour. Military jets flew within a mile of this object on their way to the Brownwood MOA. The F-16s had to have seen this object on their radar and the suspected AWACS that was circling this area must have detected and recorded this object on its state-of-the-art radar. .
Originally posted by stander
The external source quote is a mixture of BS and fear.
Originally posted by Shhmeat
WHY? Because it sounded 'unconventional'?
Because "antigravity" has been associated with 'aliens', star wars and Star trek? Because some UFO crazies say only little grey aliens can invent antigravity technology?
IT'S BECAUSE THEY HAVE FIGURED IT OUT! This alien shmalien shtuff is just disinformation to make you guys look the other way.
Don't put yourselves in a tiny cave and say every science out there belong to the aliens. We humans are smarter than that. But if some people insist that 'we were helped', then you do belong in a cave.
Occam's razor folks. Occam's razor.
That's great, but Occam's Razor proves nothing, it's just a principle.
So what makes you think aliens are dumb enough to travel such vast distances to see such 'primitive' life forms?
In your previous post you bash people for assuming how anti-gravity works, or it's effects on people, and yet you apparently know how aliens think and assume they wouldn't find us interesting.
Military industrial complex existance has been proven with no doubt. It's there.
ETs existance : blurry photos, tall stories, hoaxes, scams, lies, snake oils schems, fictional dvd and books and hoaxes and hoaxes and hoaxes.
"No one is disputing that the military industrial complex exists..."
You could make that argument if you could show us a working terrestrial anti-gravity craft. Since you can't, it's just your belief and opinion that we have such technology.
Originally posted by danx
Originally posted by stander
The external source quote is a mixture of BS and fear.
What are you talking about?
The external source quote is directly from page 48 to page 49 of the MUFON Report.
Originally posted by Shhmeat
That's it. It's a principle. You must use principles from known proven facts to make up your mind.
The MIC is a reality. They exist. It's proven.
ETs DO NOT EXIST.
Do I need to hold someone's hand everytime they need to think for themselves?
From your avatar. "Admit nothing, deny everything" So by using this 'principle' when trying to piece together a puzzle you are left with "Nothing"?
Eeeeepp! I'm not the one who's saying ridiculous things such as aliens coming from light years away just to scare some hllbilliys.
The military industrial complex is more scientifically logical than bug eyed grey midgets poking around in people's butts, playing hide and seek with the poplulation, and terrorizing cows.
Aliens don't exist.
The military industrial complex do. That's a flat fact. Then it's humans.
HUmans with enough brain cells to think we are smarter than imaginary beings made up from people smoking the too much shrooms or just plain make stuff up.
Originally posted by stander
MUFON is virtually blinded by their hopeless quest to prove to the world that "UFOs are real." This blindness prevent them to see clearly what happened on 1/8/2008. They will continue to misguide themselves and anyone else who is on the same wavelength.
Originally posted by stander
Are you implying that MUFON assesments are imune to a review based on facts?
Did their report ever asks the question why the unidentified tracked object went off radar? Hardly so.
Their questions are directed elsewhere; they maintain that AWACS would have to see the object without giving a bit of consideration to the facts seen in the charts. To MUFON, there is no difference between our planes and the UFOs: both can be "detected and traced by AWACS." A 12th century bishop would be more open-minded than those MUFON folks.
This is really unbelievable: they are looking at the facts, but don't want to accept them.