Hey Guys,
Now HAARP may have caused the waves that triggered of the earthquake, and maybe there have been nuclear accidents in the sites reported, but
there is NO WAY this was caused by an actual nuclear chain reaction inside one of these test sites or the armory.
The energy released by an 7.9 earthquake is massive, absolutely huge. The Sichaun event liberated around the equivalent of around 600 megatons.
Thats a really big amount of energy even in relation to nuclear weapons/reactors.
For illustration the Largest nuclear bomb every exploded was known as the Tsar and exploded by The Soviet Union on the 30th October 1961. It
was actually "retarded" on purpose as the design allowed a 100 megaton blast, but to reduce the radioactive fallout a 50 megaton explosion took
place.
This actually was the "cleanest" nuclear test ever with 97% of the material changed into energy, and not fallout.
This explosion was on our human perspective huge.
windowpanes were partially broken to distances of 900 km
Despite being exploded in the atmosphere, it generated substantial seismic signals. According to a bulletin of the U.S. Geological Survey it had
seismic magnitude mb = 5.0 to 5.25. The blast wave was detected circling the world.[Khalturin et al 2005]
Despite the very substantial burst height of 4,000 m (13,000 ft) the vast fireball reached down to the Earth, and swelled upward to nearly the height
of the release plane. The blast pressure below the burst point was 300 PSI, six times the peak pressure experienced at Hiroshima. The flash of light
was so bright that it was visible at a distance of 1,000 kilometers, despite cloudy skies
Nuclear Weapon Archive
So this is the largest bomb ever tested. To put in in perspective the explosion a Hiroshima was around 25KT thats kilo tons or thousands of tons of
TNT explosion.
This Tsar Bomb was 50 Megatons do the math.
Now people are saying a 600 Megaton nuclear event occurred?
Unlikely, even if a earthquake/HAARP set of one bomb (unlikely again as why would they be armed or have the triggers ready? also they still shouldn't
go off.
If however one was set of in an armory or research facility, it is implausible to state a "chain reaction"would take place with the other
fissionable material in the other bombs in close proximity. Its science fiction, a Blag, an urban myth. If these events were possible when lightening
strikes open exposed uranium as found in some parts of the earth, a chain reaction would be started.
I can assure you the Manhattan project would have taken half the time and research, if the nature of nuclear physics operated like that.
The initial event of explosion would not compress the nuclear material evenly enough, even in a sealed lab underground. The energy, would be
unsymmetrical leading to a "fizzle". The same as when tests go wrong and bombs donut explode fully.
Now this fizzle would happen with normal atomic bombs. The idea that a Thermonuclear reaction could be started in this way is even less implausible.
Only the energy released in 12 of the largest thermonuclear bombs ever made exploding at once could have liberated this energy.
As shown this is impossible by the current understanding of nuclear engineering/physics, accident HAARP or not, scalar weapons, whatever.
Whatever it was that triggered this it certainly was not a huge nuclear explosion. One accident would not lead to a "chain reaction"as postulated,
certainly those other weapons/ material in the area of the initial blast would add to and become part of the event, but not as designed to do
liberating all the nuclear material into energy.
One thing is for sure, the radiation fallout from this would have been huge if any of the sealed nature of a lab facility was breached, especially if
the event as postulated split the mountain in two etc.
Further proof of this can be seen in the Tsar test. Even though the explosion took place at a height or altitude of 4KM high a Richter reading for the
event was detected at around 5.2 - 5.4 .
So a 600 megaton event would also have a Richter reading, a single in time with no other seismic activity event. The seismic records for the event do
seem to display the normal seismic patterns for an earthquake to include the aftershocks and building s waves. Even if that quake was started
unnaturally.
To surmise, It is plausible to say the event may have a unnatural cause or "trigger" i.e. HAARP.
Nuclear accidents have probably happened due to the earthquake.
Those accidents did not start a nuclear chain reaction, and the event was not caused by nuclear means.
Kind Regards,
Elf
Richter Magnitude Scale
The Tsar Test
BBC A Short history of "Fizzles"
Virginia EDU a good Q&Aseesion on the reality of nuclear explosions
An Idea of the difficulty of trying to start a Chain reaction, even when trying! Frisch-Peierls paper 1940
manhatten
Nuclear Physics 
Thanks... 
