Proof of Bigfoot, and why it's real., page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times
Topic started on 8-3-2004 @ 11:16 PM by porschedrifter
I have worked closely with the BFRO before, with no avail, but this is immediate proof of the existance of Bigfoot.. Me personally, especially from my previous posts on the matter, believes in this animal and I'm 100% sure... but for all you non believers....

Why can't it be done? Why can't anyone accurately recreate the "costume" used in the Patterson footage?

A: It's not a man in a costume ...

The image on the right is from a scene in an episode of X-Creatures. X-Creatures was a wildlife documentary series made by a production company under contract with the BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation). The episode was filmed around 1995 or later.

Frame 72.
The moving footage reveals the movement of massive muscles in the back, and the shoulders and the limbs. These proportions and dynamics, among other things, cannot be simulated by a man in simple padded costume.

In this program the BBC sought to debunk the Patterson footage by recreating the "hoax." In order to have the most exacting re-enactment possible, the British producers hired the best monster costume designer in Hollywood and even took the costume to the same location where the Patterson incident occurred in Northern California.

How could the BBC have missed the mark so badly with their replica of the Patterson "costume"?

www.bfro.net...

www.minotdailynews.com.../3/2004|2&-Max=1&-Find

I have been "stalked" by this creature MANY times. I live in a partially wooded/residential area, but they are still out and about.


[Edited on 8-3-2004 by porschedrifter]


reply posted on 9-3-2004 @ 12:10 AM by porschedrifter
here are the screams of bigfoot.

www.bfro.net...

www.bfro.net...

www.bfro.net...

www.bfro.net...

www.bfro.net...

Michigan, I dont know hmm... check the BFRO.net sighting reports for there.. its a good chance, especially if there are heavily wooded areas


reply posted on 12-3-2004 @ 06:04 PM by EmbryonicEssence
I think the possibility of Bigfoot being real is very high. There are so many creatures in this world that we still don't know about because we have either killed them before discovering them or they are smart enough to stay far, far away from humans.

Have any of you ever heard of the Tasmanian Tiger? Well, it very much existed, but was killed to extinction - supposedly. Now it is almost like an urban myth in Australia, built up to huge proportions. In 1986 Thylacine (Tasmanian Tiger) declared extinct by international standards. Yet there are sightings of it all the time, and some of them very, very good. They have probably learned to avoid humans, at all cost.

Just because you don't see something yourself, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

How many of you have come directly face-to-face with a mountain lion while on a hike? The odds are, you haven't - they avoid humans. And most people don't venture off the beaten path. Even if they do, it is still usually close to a place where people venture. Moutain Lions and other types of "elusive" animals will usually only come onto a human beaten path at night. If they come into contact with a human, they find the quickest exit.

Take for instance the Giant Squid, we haven't caught video of one yet, let alone a live one (we supposedly caught a baby one, maybe about a foot long, don't feel like looking it up at this moment though : ). Yet, we know they exist. We have eyewitnesses and stories, and even dead ones (not too large though).

Only those who actively seek "elusive" animals have the possibility of finding them. The same goes for Bigfoot and I think if Bigfoot is as big as we think it is (from the footage shown, and eyewitnesses) and somewhat resembles a very harry human, then it at least has to have an intelligence smarter than that of most primates - probably smarter. I think it would be smart enough to avoid humans like the plague.

And like I said, Only those who actively seek "elusive" animals have the possibility of finding them. Which means that most people aren't searching for these things. If everyone and their mother was searching for these things with cameras and all, we would have all the evidence in the world, but we don't. People may carry their cameras and camcorders on the beaten path and off, but if they come across (unless they are searching) a Bear, a Cougar, a BIGFOOT, they aren't going to sit their and start snapping pictures and video. Their first instinct is to get to safety. Thats the human instinct, and it is unavoidable.

You must be searching for them and the fact is... most people aren't. There are no funds to search for Bigfoot, nor are there any to search for the supposedly extinct Tasmanian Tiger. There are funds to search for a live Giant Squid, but have you seen any video or pictures yet? It may be harder to find things in the ocean, but it is also quite hard to find things on land, especially when there is nobody getting paid to actively search for them - people with time and resources usually get what they are looking for. Think about it.

For more info on Tasmanian Tigers (they are cool looking), go to:
www.dpiwe.tas.gov.au...


[Edited on 3-12-2004 by EmbryonicEssence]
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Strange creatures from Marianas Trench
  Posted 6 days ago with 26 member flags
\'Woolly mammoth\' caught on camera in Siberia
  Posted 4 days ago with 19 member flags
icelandic lake monster spotted! (VIDEO)
  Posted 5 days ago with 16 member flags
The Bridgewater Triangle
  Posted 19 days ago with 10 member flags
Shape-Shifting Dinosaurs by Jack Horner (TED Talk)
  Posted 2 days ago with 6 member flags
Bigfoot Attack...or is the Lizard Man in Georgia?
  Posted 11 days ago with 5 member flags
\'mutant spider fears at nuclear wastelab\'
  Posted 6 days ago with 4 member flags