It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NovusOrdoMundi
reply to post by Grand Puba
I'm done debating this with you. Its clear you are not interested in facts and rational discussion. You would rather stick to this 'us against the world' mentality about your race and not open up to any sort of alternative way of thinking.
Have fun thinking the world is against you while you ignore that you are meeting the same fate as the races you are against.
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Originally posted by evanmontegarde
That's a pretty stupid idea, but shouldn't you be upset over the very fact that there is a black channel? No one would get away with having a white channel.
They do all the time. They are called NBC, CBS, ABC, FOX, MSNBC, and so forth. They may not be "white channels" in name, but they are white dominated and "white-oriented." In the upcoming TV season, there is only one new show that features a minority lead (an animated series) and even then, the character is voiced by a white man.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Originally posted by evanmontegarde
That's a pretty stupid idea, but shouldn't you be upset over the very fact that there is a black channel? No one would get away with having a white channel.
They do all the time. They are called NBC, CBS, ABC, FOX, MSNBC, and so forth. They may not be "white channels" in name, but they are white dominated and "white-oriented." In the upcoming TV season, there is only one new show that features a minority lead (an animated series) and even then, the character is voiced by a white man.
What about all the black sitcoms the "white networks" have had over the years, starting with Bill Cosby, The Jeffersons and Sanford & Son? I used to watch them all until I realized that the plotlines were all the same - the characters would spend the entire show insulting each other for laughs. Think about it. Oh, and what about ESPN? Plus, there are black commentators on Fox News all the time.
Bottom line is that the claim that the major TV networks are "whites only" networks is clearly bogus.
[edit on 7/10/2008 by centurion1211]
Originally posted by maria_stardust
That's just utterly stupid.
Originally posted by maria_stardust
you almost act as if the Republican convention will be receiving no coverage at all. .
Originally posted by maria_stardust
They can show whatever they choose.
Originally posted by xmotex
Why the hell would they want to cover the RNC?
Originally posted by Grand Puba
Whites knew blacks would get thirsty, therefore..."Whites only water fountains!"
Whites knew blacks would get hungry, therefore..."Whites only resturants!"
Whites knew blacks after eating and drinking would need a toilet, therefore..."Whites only restrooms"
Whites never expected blacks to have the intelligence to develop a tv station!
If they did, we would have had a White Entertainment Television channel a long azz time ago!
Peace!
Originally posted by sos37
Originally posted by Grand Puba
Whites knew blacks would get thirsty, therefore..."Whites only water fountains!"
Whites knew blacks would get hungry, therefore..."Whites only resturants!"
Whites knew blacks after eating and drinking would need a toilet, therefore..."Whites only restrooms"
Whites never expected blacks to have the intelligence to develop a tv station!
If they did, we would have had a White Entertainment Television channel a long azz time ago!
Peace!
Okay that's going WAYYYY too far on the stereotyping - referring to your sentence "Whites never expected blacks to have the intelligence to develop a tv station!". I'm sure there were some whites who might have thought that way but I'm sure many white people knew that black people were just as intelligent as they were because they are people just as they are with the capacity for rational, intelligent thought. To think that they weren't intelligent would be to think they were savages, which they aren't! Black people have never acted as savages - at least not any more so than the white man has throughout history!
Originally posted by bobafett
Just LOL at the whole idea of a 'black channel'
Sometimes I feel like I'd like to start a 'white channel' or 'white club', just to troll these guys, but then I remember I'm trying in my life not to be a massive racist, and two wrongs don't make a right.
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
if it bothers you so much - go invest your money in "white TV"
im sure there are a few Klan members in your neighborhood who would support the cause.
Originally posted by NovusOrdoMundi
reply to post by Grand Puba
See, this is what I'm talking about. If I said the things you are saying, except reversed and in favor of whites, and with the amount of enthusiasm that you are displaying, I would be a racist.
Thats the double standard I am talking about. And you are so blinded by your disgust for an event that you yourself did not go through that you cannot even see that double standard. You cannot see how there are things blacks can say and do that whites cannot without being labeled a racist.
THAT my friend is a limitation on freedom for WHITES! Not blacks.
And even that sentence right there, claiming that freedom of speech has more limitations for whites than blacks when it comes to racially related discussion, may get me labeled a racist by some people.
Whites are not allowed to be "proud". Whites aren't allowed to speak out in favor of their own race. Whites aren't allowed to assemble and protest for "their people". Whites aren't allowed to discuss "white history" and use the term "white history". Whites aren't allowed to form groups and have spokespeople like Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton, otherwise those groups are Neo-Nazi groups with racist intentions.
This is what you can't see, because you choose not to see it. You feel black people should be given the world for what they went through, so anything short of that is a disappointment. You always need a little more, right? Nothing is good enough.
What if I said that the slaves were given better lives - food to eat, water to drink, a place to live, clothes to wear - than they would have in Africa? What if I said that I believe many of them probably were willing to come from Africa to this "new world", even if it meant slavery, in hopes of a better life? I would be a racist, wouldn't I? Because we can't even consider or fathom the distinct possibility that slavery wasn't as bad as we thought, and many may have done it willingly. That would kind of destroy your whole argument and cause, wouldn't it?
I'm done now. If I keep going I'll probably get warned or banned. Which would only prove my point further.
Originally posted by NovusOrdoMundi
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
if it bothers you so much - go invest your money in "white TV"
im sure there are a few Klan members in your neighborhood who would support the cause.
Thank you for proving everyone's point. "Black TV" is A-OK! but "White TV" would draw interest from Klan members.
Great logic there, buddy. Great double standard.
By saying that, you have just supported everyone's argument against your own argument, therefore contradicting and destroying your own.
Support for Obama doesn't prevent you from backing down from ignorant statements like that. I fear it is your ego that is doing that.