40 'Smoking Guns' Collectively Proving That 9/11 Was An Inside Job, page 2

Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by GoldenFleece

---

it means that they are able to DEPLOY overseas quickly, NOT maintain a ready alert

I see -- "highest possible state of readiness" only refers to overseas missions.

Is that why their website says "We will provide operational support to our local communities whenever possible?"

reply to post by GoldenFleece

---

Swamp was referring to (I believe) the external quote you posted without a link. That incident happened August 9, 2002 which occurred after September 11, 2001.


There is a difference between being combat ready and being on 15 minute NORAD alert.

However, the term "combat ready" does not mean "available to launch within minutes" on an emergency intercept. It's a more general term than that. For example, the 180th Fighter Wing page tells us that:

"The mission of the 112th Fighter Squadron is to provide combat ready aircrews capable of deploying anywhere in the world within 24 hours of notification". Source

From the same source:

The Air National Guard exclusively performs the air sovereignty mission in the continental United States, and those units fall under the control of the 1st Air Force based at Tyndall. The Guard maintains seven alert sites with 14 fighters and pilots on call around the clock. Besides Homestead, alert birds also sit armed and ready at Tyndall; Langley AFB, Va.; Otis Air National Guard Base, Mass.; Portland International Airport, Ore.; March ARB, Calif.; and Ellington Field, Texas

[edit on 9-7-2008 by Boone 870]

reply to post by GoldenFleece

---

Yep, every local community I know needs to be able to call in air strikes at a moments notice....

Good lord, do you even have the first frigging clue about what that really means? I mean, at my base we have a bunch of F-16s, but they arent maintained in a ready alert status (however our site also talks about "high state of readiness" and we can deploy overseas on short notice if needed. HOWEVER, our civil engineering unit, our security forces unit, and the rest of us CAN (and do) mobilize for flood duties, storm relief, civil emergencies etc... in a couple hours.

reply to post by Swampfox46_1999

---

OK, whatever you say.

No ready-alert fighters at the home of Air Force One...

reply to post by GoldenFleece

---

Do you have the slightest idea what military units do for the communities? They do a LOT for them. They adopt schools and send soldiers to tutor, they rebuilt things around the schools, they rebuild homes, they help with cleanups around roads, there are any NUMBER of things that they do that help with the communities. In times of disaster they get aid out, they respond to flooding to help sandbag, all of these things fall under "providing operational support to local communities".

reply to post by GoldenFleece

---

Well, the dawn starts to break......

Now if you can just make the whole breakthrough and say

"No alert fighters at the home of Air Force One on 9/11" you will have made the first step to enlightenment

reply to post by GoldenFleece

---

As I said in an earlier post, that you ignored, there were several bases on the Eastern Seaboard that could respond to threats INCOMING to the United States. That was the entire point of the alert force, to respond to threats from OUTSIDE the US coming in. In an evacuation the President would be gone from the White House and at Andrews getting on a plane by the time the fighters launched.

Alert fighters sit on an Alert 15 status. They have 15 minutes to launch from the time the klaxon sounds. From the White House to Andrews by helicopter, is about 15 minutes MAX. And if they weren't expecting a threat, and didn't have either Air Force One, or an E-4 ready to launch at the time of an evac, they wouldn't go to Andrews. They would take him somewhere secure, until they could get a plane in to take him out of the area. You don't just start engines and take off in a plane. It takes awhile to preflight and get it ready to go.

Originally posted by GoldenFleece
reply to post by Swampfox46_1999

---

OK, whatever you say.

No ready-alert fighters at the home of Air Force One...

Your are presented with over whelming evidence that there were no fighters on that base prior to 9/11, there are now Post 9/11 which is where your article came from. Thats it.. That point is debunked. Please move on, its like watching a train wreck you trying to explain this, even though what they are telling you is absolutely true. Anyways... Seeking the truth, mean actually seeking the truth and have the knowledge and common sense to know when it is presented to you.

Originally posted by Boone 870
reply to post by GoldenFleece

---

Swamp was referring to (I believe) the external quote you posted without a link. That incident happened August 9, 2002 which occurred after September 11, 2001.


There is a difference between being combat ready and being on 15 minute NORAD alert.

Oh, I see. That's why fighters from Andrews AFB were called in when "He was within eight miles" of the White House, she said. "It's enough to affect our emergency response plan."

Yeah, yeah, I know -- all this happened AFTER 9/11 and even though the DCANG website mentioned providing combat units in "the highest possible state of readiness" BRFORE 9/11, that state of readiness wasn't necessarily 24/7.

And even though the website mentioned providing "operational support to our
local communities whenever possible", they didn't really mean it.

reply to post by GoldenFleece

---

His alternative was "to hit it--cut the wing off with my wing. If I played it right, I'd be able to bail out. One hand on the stick and one hand on the ejection handle, trying to ram my airplane into the aft side of the [airliner's] wing," he said. "And do it skillfully enough to save the pink body . . . but understanding that it might not go as planned. It was a tough nut; we had no other ordnance."

Why was this DCANG pilot considering ramming a commercial airliner if he had an alert/armed fighter?

reply to post by GoldenFleece

---

I'm sorry the DRG lead you down the wrong path.

Now it is up to you to except that he is a liar or you can ignore the overwhelming evidence that proves him wrong.

reply to post by GoldenFleece

---

Nope...the clouds return. Either you are not intelligent enough to understand or are intentionally NOT understanding the posts.

Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 10 days ago with 48 member flags

9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 2 days ago with 45 member flags

9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 13 days ago with 43 member flags

WTC7, the smoking gun that just will not go away until the traitors are rounded up
  Posted 3 days ago with 35 member flags

What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 6 days ago with 17 member flags

Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 14 days ago with 13 member flags

Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 16 days ago with 9 member flags

British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 7 days ago with 8 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: