80% of Americans think 9/11 was an inside job!, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 9-7-2008 @ 05:34 AM by alienj
Omg here we go again, wacky blog links to support this incredible idiotic view of 9/11, 80 percent could be that he talked to ten people and hand selected the ten he wanted, thats a real scientific poll. This lunacy has to stop, are there really that many people without an education that cannot reason commons sense.. This is the site you need to be reading
debunking911.com...

show me a site that is that comprehensive about us blowing our own buildings up and I might look at it. Pls dont point me to some un-checked, non factual site, that does the he said she said bit...

Now here are the real stats, I wont quote my grandmother like the op did but Ill post Rasmussen polls "Overall, 22% of all voters believe the President knew about the attacks in advance. A slightly larger number, 29%, believe the CIA knew about the attacks in advance. White Americans are less likely than others to believe that either the President or the CIA knew about the attacks in advance. Young Americans are more likely than their elders to believe the President or the CIA knew about the attacks in advance. "
www.rasmussenreports.com... n_advance

That was a poll taken early 2007 and since then more of the final report of the towers going down has come out and less and less believe. What we have now is the fringe left loons and the Bush haters still hanging in there.

If our goverment is so inept as you think then how in hell could they cover up something so big, this is kool-aid talking guys... Hang on let me look up a rehab center for kool-aid drinkers...I think theres one near you


[edit on 9-7-2008 by alienj]

[edit on 9-7-2008 by alienj]


reply posted on 9-7-2008 @ 09:00 AM by Sharr
reply to post by ThroatYogurt


"Polls do not=evidence" If this is true why did you post a poll? Good job

Oh and another thing, I see that poll was taken by CBS...The ILLUMINATI network ... A TRULY reliable source for accurate information on 9/11 your on a roll pal

so a word of advice... If you dont believe polls are suitable evidence, DONT post one yourself and refer to it as evidence. That just makes you a hypocrit.


reply posted on 9-7-2008 @ 09:42 AM by Sharr
To those of you here who cant stop talking about how "wrong" the 80% statistic is, maybe you should focus on the TRUE meaning of this thread. I believe the writer of this thread was trying to point out that IF 80% of Americans KNOW 9/11 was an inside job.. then why the hell is nobody doing ANYTHING about it? Every American Citizen who has ever found out for themselves that their government has lied to them on NUMEROUS occasions, NEEDS to ALL get together, MARCH RIGHT INTO THAT WHITE HOUSE, and FIRE EVERY person in the current admin. And NO, this is NOT "easier said than done" EVERY democratic citizen in this world has not only the RIGHT, but the ABSOLUTE authority to fire ANY ONE of their leaders at ANY time. If EVERYONE got together, put aside their differences, and decided to work TOGETHER, there is NOTHING the NWO can do to stop us. Are you really too scared to stand up to these 3 crippled old men?!





Whether 80% or 50% of Americans know that 9/11 was an inside job, the point is people are waking up; and its happening exponentially right infront of our very eyes. And also, i can clearly see the NWO plan of divide and conquer is working quite well, even here on ATS. You guys cant even stop arguing about the PERCENT of knowledgable people out there, instead of identifying your SIMILARITIES and working together. A poll is an Estimation, NO POLL is accurate... the only definition of an accurate poll, would be a poll where EVERY SINGLE person on the earth was asked the SAME question. So what exactly are you trying to accomplish by dabating about polls?

And to the writer of this thread, Good work! I understand the message you were trying to convey and im right here with ya! COME ON PEOPLE LETS WORK FOR PEACE!!

yours in the light



reply posted on 9-7-2008 @ 10:38 AM by sos37
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
reply to
post by Taxi-Driver


You conveniently ignore the fact that according to a two year-old Scripps-Howard poll, over a third of the nation thinks 9/11 was an inside job.

P.S. I like your skull 'n bones avatar. Almost reminds me of, uhhh, Skull and Bones.


.

[edit on 9-7-2008 by GoldenFleece]


Two things ...

First - Uh, you need to go back to your own source and read it again. Here's what it says:

More than a third of the American public suspects that federal officials assisted in the 9/11 terrorist attacks OR took no action to stop them so the United States could go to war in the Middle East, according to a new Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll.


Notice the word "OR" in the first sentence. You saying a third of Americans believe the government assisted in the 9/11 attacks would be a mistake. The story is lumping the two stats together. The second stat, saying that we did nothing to stop them, is a far cry from saying that we did nothing on purpose. Did we do nothing on purpose or did we do nothing because we had never faced a situation like that before and it caught us with our pants down? The poll doesn't say and you cannot assume anything.

Second:

Zogby says 5% of America strongly agrees with that statement, that 9/11 was carried out by our government and 4% somewhat agree, which means they think they government had a hand in it but was not entirely responsible. Even if you took the the full 9% plus the +3% margin of error for 12%, that's a far cry from one-third (about 33%).

So either way, the numbers you cite are bunk.

Now, allow me to disagree with the assertion that the U.S. did nothing to stop the terrorist attacks. I would argue that people who say the U.S. govt did nothing to stop the attacks don't know the full story.

From the section on Interagency Collaboration:

The protocols did not contemplate an intercept. They assumed the fighter escort would be discreet, "vectored to a position five miles directly behind the hijacked aircraft," where it could perform its mission to monitor the aircraft's flight path.105

In sum, the protocols in place on 9/11 for the FAA and NORAD to respond to a hijacking presumed that

the hijacked aircraft would be readily identifiable and would not attempt to disappear;
there would be time to address the problem through the appropriate FAA and NORAD chains of command; and
hijacking would take the traditional form: that is, it would not be a suicide hijacking designed to convert the aircraft into a guided missile.
On the morning of 9/11, the existing protocol was unsuited in every respect for what was about to happen.


and

Military Notification and Response. Boston Center did not follow the protocol in seeking military assistance through the prescribed chain of command. In addition to notifications within the FAA, Boston Center took the initiative, at 8:34, to contact the military through the FAA's Cape Cod facility. The center also tried to contact a former alert site in Atlantic City, unaware it had been phased out. At 8:37:52, Boston Center reached NEADS. This was the first notification received by the military-at any level-that American 11 had been hijacked:115


And the MOST IMPORTANT paragraph to pay attention, in my opinion:

F-15 fighters were scrambled at 8:46 from Otis Air Force Base. But NEADS did not know where to send the alert fighter aircraft, and the officer directing the fighters pressed for more information: "I don't know where I'm scrambling these guys to. I need a direction, a destination." Because the hijackers had turned off the plane's transponder, NEADS personnel spent the next minutes searching their radar scopes for the primary radar return. American 11 struck the North Tower at 8:46. Shortly after 8:50, while NEADS personnel were still trying to locate the flight, word reached them that a plane had hit the World Trade Center.119

Radar data show the Otis fighters were airborne at 8:53. Lacking a target, they were vectored toward military-controlled airspace off the Long Island coast. To avoid New York area air traffic and uncertain about what to do, the fighters were brought down to military airspace to "hold as needed. "From 9:09 to 9:13, the Otis fighters stayed in this holding pattern.120

In summary, NEADS received notice of the hijacking nine minutes before it struck the North Tower. That nine minutes' notice before impact was the most the military would receive of any of the four hijackings.121


The last paragraph says it all. Makes a lot more sense doesn't it?

My source is: govinfo.library.unt.edu...



[edit on 9-7-2008 by sos37]


reply posted on 9-7-2008 @ 11:16 AM by GoldenFleece
Originally posted by sos37
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
reply to
post by Taxi-Driver


You conveniently ignore the fact that according to a two year-old Scripps-Howard poll, over a third of the nation thinks 9/11 was an inside job.

P.S. I like your skull 'n bones avatar. Almost reminds me of, uhhh, Skull and Bones.


.

[edit on 9-7-2008 by GoldenFleece]


Two things ...

First - Uh, you need to go back to your own source and read it again. Here's what it says:

More than a third of the American public suspects that federal officials assisted in the 9/11 terrorist attacks OR took no action to stop them so the United States could go to war in the Middle East, according to a new Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll.


Notice the word "OR" in the first sentence. You saying a third of Americans believe the government assisted in the 9/11 attacks would be a mistake. The story is lumping the two stats together. The second stat, saying that we did nothing to stop them, is a far cry from saying that we did nothing on purpose. Did we do nothing on purpose or did we do nothing because we had never faced a situation like that before and it caught us with our pants down? The poll doesn't say and you cannot assume anything.

Your explanation is absurd. The wording is very clear: "took no action to stop them SO the United States could go to war in the Middle East." Taking no action to facilitate a specific outcome is aiding and abetting, just like the false flag terrorist "Operation Northwoods" that was planned 40 years earlier. If you'll do any research into 9/11, you'll come away with the unmistakable impression that what happened goes WAY beyond any "took no action" scenario. It was an obvious stand-down, as reported by Norm Mineta in recounting a conversation by Rumsfeld. Spending more than the rest of the world combined on "defense" buys more than a bumbling NORAD and fighter pilots who can't seem to locate hijacked jets.

There's no "they did nothing because they were caught off-guard" option. To even suggest such a thing after the many warnings that were received from other countries and multiple FBI agents is intellectually dishonest and a distortion of what actually happened.


reply posted on 9-7-2008 @ 11:22 AM by thefreepatriot
reply to post by Nonchalant



True Bush doesn't know what the hell his doing.. he is just a puppet, I kind o feel bad for him, His name in history will go down as the worst president ever.. All just to make his "freinds" happy and his daddy
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 13 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 6 days ago with 12 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 17 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 14 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 8 days ago with 6 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 17 hours ago, 118 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 12 hours ago, 99 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 11 hours ago, 64 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 7 hours ago, 60 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 15 hours ago, 50 replies