It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Rabmal
Every documentary you watch on the Apollo missions, they use the phrase "the race for the moon". When the USA started the mission to reach the moon we were well behind the Soviets in the "race for the moon". As history played out the USA was the first country to reach the moon, but this begs a question.
Why did the Soviets not land a man on the moon as well even if it would have been second? Not in the 60's, not in the 70's and not in the 80's. I know they landed a rover on the moon but not a man.
One would imagine that if the Soviets had been the first to place a man on the moon we would not have stopped trying to get there and certainly still would have put our own man on the moon.
You would think that the Soviets would want to know first hand what it is like there and also check out if we put anything there as well. (Especially, considering the paranoia we had for each other at the time.) I understand they may be able to do this remotely, but you would think they would want to put "boots on the ground" as well.
This would be akin to the Spanish coming to the New World and the English deciding to just stay home and listen to stories about it.
In the 30 years past you would have thought that some country would have wanted to land a man on the moon for themselves. I would be interested in hearing anyone's insight on this.
Originally posted by IgnoreTheFacts
Why didn't the Russians complete a manned moon shot? In a word(s).....capitalism, freedom, education and democracy.
I could explain further, but if one doesn't understand without further explanation I fear my logic would not be understood.
Originally posted by Cythraul
Surely, you're all missing an important point. If we're going to talk about pride, Russia would have had a HUGE amount to gain from going to the moon and proving that the US never did - more valuable than the loss they'd suffer by only being in second place.
Originally posted by IgnoreTheFacts
Why didn't the Russians complete a manned moon shot? In a word(s).....capitalism, freedom, education and democracy.
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
As for capitalism, well, that has consequences as well--now that the US is becoming a fascist state where the corporations run the government, innovation is just as stifled as it was under the Soviet regime.
Does anyone really believe the Ares program is that far behind because we just can't figure out the tech? I mean, come on, people--Burt Rutan created what is essentially a miniature Space Shuttle on a shoestring budget.
The most complicated equipment in the Apollo program was the computers, and most Americans' cell phones are more sophisticated than the computers that took us to the Moon.