Stun Bracelet for ALL Airline Passengers?, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 12 times


reply posted on 8-7-2008 @ 12:35 PM by marg6043
reply to post by merryxmas



Here is more information on the bracelets by the company itself.

www.lamperdlesslethal.com...

Scroll to the end of the page to read on the different PDF documents talking about our government at state, local and congress interest in the devices.

Already Colorado, Wyoming and Montana has shown interest and they want Mexico also.

So its more to the bracelet than just airport security.

It looks like they are waiting for funding at local level and through grants, this means that some private organizations and groups are looking into the devices.





[edit on 8-7-2008 by marg6043]



reply posted on 8-7-2008 @ 12:44 PM by The Nighthawk
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
I fear the US goverment more than I fear any terrorist. If I ran the show, I would mandate all citizens carry a side arm, and tell them that it's each citizens responsibility to make sure the US is safe.


And what you'd get is a million incompetent nincompoops shooting at their own shadows.

"That guy looked at me funny--he must be a terrorist!" *BANG*

"That girl is wearing a veil--I bet there's a bomb strapped to her waist!" *BANG*

"That guy's skin is a different color and his accent is weird!" *BANG*

As another posted earlier, the person with his hand on the buttion for these things has to power to activate them at a whim based on his "best judgment". Not that I think this is a good idea--if it happens I'll never fly commercial again--but if you're not willing to trust the judgment of a trained observer in using something like this, why would you trust the judgment of millions of untrained individuals with far more lethal weaponry at hand?

Like it or not, there are a lot of people in this country who, by reason of mental defect, poor motor skills, or just plain old crass stupidity, should not be allowed to own and/or use guns. Encouraging such people to carry all the time and use their "best judgment" to take the law into their own hands is sheer lunacy.

Spread the power evenly throughout the citizens, instead of awarding some organization power over everyone. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Once you have absolute power, you are a god, and everyone else is consumable item subjects, to do whatever you bid.


As a socialist I'm inclined to agree with this. However, I recognize the need for trained professionals for functions such as law enforcement. The problem arises when those professionals are not held to high enough standards by the civilian authorities and are not disciplined by their superiors. Checks and balances only work when those responsible for checking and maintaining the balance do their jobs properly according to the mandate of the People. It is the People who have abdicated their responsibility to demand higher standards, accountability and common sense.


reply posted on 8-7-2008 @ 01:36 PM by jackinthebox
reply to post by Keyhole



I have a better idea. Lets' just get right to it and RENDER AIR-PASSENGERS UNCONCIOUS right from the start.


reply posted on 8-7-2008 @ 02:46 PM by Keyhole
reply to post by merryxmas



Here are a couple links to letters sent by the Department of Homeland Security to the company who produces these bracelets ( LAMPERD) that are on their website..

The topic of the Homeland Security Letters is:

Subject: Improved Border Security with the Detention and Possible Immobilization of Detainees Using the Security Bracelet ZATTS.

In the third paragraph down
on this page, it says:



In addition it is conceivable to envision a use to improve air security, on passenger planes.



and here is the last page of that letter.

And I guess maybe cattle prods will be next if the lines at the airports start moving too slowly for them!

reply to post by jackinthebox



I sure hope they don't see THAT thread of yours, but then again, they've probably contemplated it already!

The new way to fly! Sleep your way across the country! (No extra charge!)

[edit on 7/8/2008 by Keyhole]


reply posted on 8-7-2008 @ 03:14 PM by spines
reply to post by centurion1211



Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by manson_322
this exposes the fact that USA treats its own like animals ...

wow , more crimes against humanity will be committed by USA


Uh, to remind you. These measures are having to be considered (and I hope they are rejected!) not because the U.S. population are being treated like animals. It is rather because of what the terrorist "animals" you seem to be supporting have done.


It is this mindset which allowed for the sweeping loss of constitutional rights post-9/11.

We run to our government scared and stupid, seeming to forget the repeated pattern of abuse of power. It is easier to carry on, not making a fuss, than to adress the obvious.

We are free damnit...

...because they say we are!




reply posted on 8-7-2008 @ 04:28 PM by spines
reply to post by centurion1211



Rather then spend a long time typing it all out, I will link to a .pdf file which states it more clearly and much more concisely then I am able to.

This is the .pdf file, and this is the site from which it originates.


reply posted on 8-7-2008 @ 04:40 PM by centurion1211
Originally posted by spines
reply to
post by centurion1211



Rather then spend a long time typing it all out, I will link to a .pdf file which states it more clearly and much more concisely then I am able to.

This is the .pdf file, and this is the site from which it originates.




The New York Civil Liberties Union. Like the ACLU, their name is a total oxymoron. Both organizations long ago changed from actually guarding civil liberties to pursuing a totally PC agenda. As I mentioned earlier, I'm much more concerned with the loss of my rights due to PC - so far. Just really hope they don't make the logical leap to thinking, "Hey, why not make drivers licenses work this way, too?"




[edit on 7/8/2008 by centurion1211]


reply posted on 8-7-2008 @ 06:02 PM by NorthWolfe CND
reply to post by jackinthebox



Great idea, I would go along with that

I hate flying but have to do it all the time, that would be great for me, I would same a fortune on pills...



reply posted on 8-7-2008 @ 07:04 PM by Alexander_Supertramp
reply to post by Keyhole



And the masses will be fooled into thinking that it's worth the loss of freedom for this new kind of "protection" from hijackers.


reply posted on 8-7-2008 @ 11:39 PM by shipovfools
Originally posted by depth om
reply to
post by manson_322



Committed by THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA yes, but not The United States.


Hehe, great point there. The whole idea of a 'nation' disgusts me. Nations exist only to serve their own abstract political agendas, inevitably moving towards empire for those with the power to do so. The US was [supposedly] founded in rebellion of that very idea. But no, now we have a "federal government" which is no longer a voluntary relationship between independent States (as it should be) but is rather a behemoth monstrosity that has even brainwashed most of us into thinking that "we are Amerika" as a united entity (i.e. "reification," the one and only sin of the enlightened) controlled by "our" government in D.C. Its BS...I didn't sign up for this Excrement!


reply posted on 9-7-2008 @ 02:09 AM by Shaker
reply to post by NorthWolfe CND



What you bring up here is a valid point too. My main point was to the vacationers and not really to the business travel. Assuming that is what your frequent flying is for... but I don't want to presume...

I don't remember anything being said about international travelers being required to wear the bracelet, as far as I knew it just said this was for domestic travel here in the States. They might be able to mandate wearing one on the outbound flight, but how could they enforce it at international hubs outside of US jurisdiction? CIA? Who knows...

After all is said and done though, this is still a pretty bad idea brought upon by a need for control, that shows no regard to travelers safety.

However on the other hand, I can see where they would be coming from using the terrorist argument. That if some person tried to take over the plane someone, be it the pilot or flight attendant or whoever has the little buttons, they would get zapped and then restrained. Flight saved.

But out of the thousands of flights per day around the world, how many hijackings are there per month on average? Now they want to slap these things on us every time we fly "just in case."

In my humble opinion there are better things they could be spending money on to make this country safer and more secure without having to resort to the shredding of any personal liberties.

Just my 0.0127427 Euros...
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 16 hours ago, 114 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 12 hours ago, 98 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 10 hours ago, 63 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 6 hours ago, 58 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 14 hours ago, 50 replies