Stun Bracelet for ALL Airline Passengers?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 12 times


reply posted on 7-7-2008 @ 05:53 PM by monkeybus
Gatordone I could not disagree more.



[edit on 7-7-2008 by monkeybus]

[edit on 7-7-2008 by monkeybus]

[edit on 7-7-2008 by monkeybus]


reply posted on 8-7-2008 @ 03:54 AM by NorthWolfe CND
reply to post by Keyhole



Would not surprise me at all...
I constantly fly all over the world and see the amount of abuse, and inhumane treatment that many passengers are being submitted to. Frying from JFK to London I even saw a passenger, that was a little bit drunk, being brutally handled by the flight attendants and having a "welcoming party" of police waiting to take him into custody upon arrival. And all this because, from what I could figure out, he had raised his voice and protested about something...

And if you happen to be nervous, or tend to be a bit phobic or panicky then you are in for the worst experience of your life...

The stupidity of this is that while passengers are constantly being harassed, the cargo that the plane carries is hardly checked (by law only 10% of the cargo is screened). Go figure...



reply posted on 8-7-2008 @ 05:16 AM by Shaker
I honestly can not imagine the majority of people going against this if it was put into place. Sure people might grumble a little bit, but then they'll just do what they're told and put it on just to board the plane.

This happened when they started checking a lot harder at the security lines at the airports. Now people just go earlier to make the flight and maybe show a little agitation.

Some agency wants to know what everyone is doing all the time and the majority of people roll over and take it.

It happens when people think, "I'm not doing anything wrong so what does it matter?"

I know there will be people out there that already bought tickets, they get to the airport and check the luggage, and then get told they have to wear this bracelet. Most people will say okay and be done with it. Others will ask what for and get a watered down explanation and then go with it. And precious few people will demand their money back and find another way to travel.

Then promptly get arrested for "disturbing the peace" or some BS charge because the airline refused to refund the money and someone got upset.


Slightly off topic, but still might hold a tiny bit of relevance... I recently found out that (at least in Utah) if you have a driver license, that alone authorizes any police officer to search your car if you have been pulled over. No matter what. It's not something they tell you when you go to apply for a license, just hidden in state law.

So imagine what else they would hide in lawyer-ese about anything else "for your safety."



At least this is the feeling I get when I'm out and at places to observe this behavior... Sad really.


reply posted on 8-7-2008 @ 07:00 AM by wayno
reply to post by Shaker



pretty much agree with everything you have said in your post
most people will just go along with it and do nothing more than grumble a bit
i would add that if the technology is available it will be used
and it won't just b used on airplanes - it will be used everywhere - for safety sake, and the average Joe will think its a good thing.
I thought the idea of chip implants was bad enough, but adding the extra capability of ZAPPING the person is just too sweet, I'm sure, for the PTB
to ignore,
and as has already been said, the now ever so frightened American citizenry is ripe for this abuse.


reply posted on 8-7-2008 @ 11:49 AM by Keyhole
reply to post by DisabledVet



This thread was started "posted on 7/7/2008 @ 02:51 PM".

Yours was started "posted on 7/7/2008 @ 10:57 PM".

At least that's the times I see that each thread was submitted.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now, about this bracelet the government may want to put on every airline passenger

Here are a few quotes from Bush after 9/11:

"This new enemy seeks to destroy our freedom and impose its views."

Is it freedom when you are forced to wear a bracelet that somebody can immobolize you with? Who exactly is destroying our freedoms!

"We will always value freedom, yet we will not allow those who plot against our country to abuse our freedoms and our protections."

It seems like our own government is the one abusing our freedoms if they allow this shocking bracelet idea to go forward.

"One way to defeat terrorism is to show the world the true values of America through the gathering momentum of a million acts of responsibility and decency and service."

What American value does it show the world by having civillians wearing immobilizing bracelets? Is it an act of decency to require your citizens to wear a immobilizing/shocking bracelet? Just in case?

"We will not give in to exaggerated fears or passing rumors. We will rely on good judgment and good old common sense."

Well, in my book, even thinking about forcing airline passengers to wear these shocking bracelets shows the governments "exaggerated fears", and I really don't think that this idea shows "good judgment and good old common sense.

Seems like the US government is the one who is de-humanizing Americans now more than the terrorists!

[edit on 7/8/2008 by Keyhole]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Official Maine Caucus Results Thread!!
  2012 US Elections, Posted 7 hours ago, 81 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 17 hours ago, 69 replies