AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Space Exploration discussion forum.  (rss)


Mars Image: Building (Pics)


<<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>



reply posted on 9-7-2008 @ 02:44 AM by mikesingh


Originally posted by LonelyWolf
Ok, I have studied the same photograph a bit closer and found this. I have no idea what this means but these traces seems interesting to me. Any suggestions ?



Check it out here...

www.thelivingmoon.com...



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-7-2008 @ 03:10 AM by mikesingh


Originally posted by LonelyWolf
I'd like to share some more parts of the initial bigger image which I have found interesting:




Yep! I've colorized it and hauled it through a couple of filters. This is what turns up:



Notice the squares toward the right and the long gemetric depression running through it? Looks like part of a square block. Strange gelogical formation, what?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-7-2008 @ 03:13 AM by zorgon


Originally posted by Quazga
God what *Morons* we have on the boards these days.


You mean the kind that try to use a small 1 inch mineral crystal to explain how a 'boulder' on Mars could exist?


Have a look in the mirror



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-7-2008 @ 03:26 AM by mikesingh


Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Quazga
God what *Morons* we have on the boards these days.

Have a look in the mirror


Hey Ron! You a moron too? Welcome to the club! It's free, you know. Lol!

Celebration time! Cheers!



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 9-7-2008 @ 04:39 AM by Nizzmo


Although that square does look out of place... after you posted the zoomed out view of the area I must admit that very similar looking objects are scattered around the area generally.

Might just be a square looking rock from our perspective? The picture aint perfect.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-7-2008 @ 05:49 AM by noone81


this picutre here u guys got posted, just dont look right, when i look at it i see way way to many square shapes, and "straight" lines, and u know what that means,




i think this pic has been totally fubard

the picture also the OP posted, the rock sure does look outta place, i mean if u look at all the other "surrounding" "tipical" rocks, and debris, or what ever u wish, it looks like the "rock" is totally differnt then the rest, just seems a bit "unnatural" for its environment. id say theres more here then we are led to belive,



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-7-2008 @ 09:28 AM by super70


reply to post by LonelyWolf



Hey Lonelywolf, can you please post the HiRise JP2 link that your images were cropped from? I'd like to take a look at that one, nice find!



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-7-2008 @ 11:14 AM by DAVID64


I'm new here so first of all, hello!! Now, enough about me. why is it that nasa never sends a lander any where near one of these sights? sure, if you ask they will come up with all kinds of excuses. Budget, no clear landing sight, no interesting ...whoops!How they can honestly say that when there are so many people that want to know? we are tired of this crap!! now it's ho~hum, more pics of mars. but if they sent a mission there, think of the response!



Mod Note: All Caps – Please Review This Link.


[edit on 9-7-2008 by Jbird]



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 9-7-2008 @ 01:02 PM by LonelyWolf


Hi super70,

this is the image I worked with. I wonder why but IASViewer just doesn't open any large .JP2 file I download from the hirise site so I have to use other software for analyzing such images.

hirise-pds.lpl.arizona.edu...



[edit on 9-7-2008 by LonelyWolf]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-7-2008 @ 01:15 PM by Deaf Alien


reply to post by LonelyWolf



I had the same problem. Try disabling firewall or unblock the program.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-7-2008 @ 01:29 PM by LonelyWolf


Originally posted by Deaf Alien
reply to post by LonelyWolf



I had the same problem. Try disabling firewall or unblock the program.


Well, I've solved the problem. In fact, I was trying to open the downloaded file from a directory which was named in Russian. Moving the image to disk C did the magic and IASViewer gives me no more such errorros




   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-7-2008 @ 02:56 PM by Anonymous ATS


Did anybody manage to figure out the size of this 'thing'?

I believe this was asked earlier in the thread.

If it's only 1mm in length then it is probably not worth worrying about. On the other hand if it was say a mile long then I would be very worried that something is definately going on up there on Mars.

Size please.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-7-2008 @ 02:57 PM by GodMode


not for nothing..but that pic could totally be a natural formation...ive seen even stranger, more geometric shapes in nature right here on earth....people continue to reach for the ridiculous.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-7-2008 @ 06:14 PM by ArMaP


reply to post by Anonymous ATS



It was asked and it was answered, but I don't mind repeating it.

At 27.4 centimetres per pixel, that object is more or less 3 metres long by 2 metres wide.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 9-7-2008 @ 06:20 PM by ArMaP


reply to post by DAVID64



First of all, welcome, but only if you stop shouting.

If you were in their shoes what would you do, would you send a lander to where you wanted or to some place where some other people that you do not even know that exist want you to send it?

It looks like it is fashionable to accuse NASA of everything, but we should be realistic, it is impossible to send landers to all interesting sites.

Edited to correct stupid mistakes.

[edit on 9/7/2008 by ArMaP]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-7-2008 @ 10:52 PM by zorgon


Originally posted by mikesingh
Welcome to the club! It's free, you know.


No I am a member of the Learites remember? Were the top of the Loonie Bin

Hey Mike and ArMaP either of you have links to Surveyor 1 images?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-7-2008 @ 01:52 AM by rhw007


Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by mikesingh
Welcome to the club! It's free, you know.


No I am a member of the Learites remember? Were the top of the Loonie Bin

Hey Mike and ArMaP either of you have links to Surveyor 1 images?


Which "Surveyor 1" mission are you discussing? Here is list of all pds data sets:

pds-geosciences.wustl.edu...

Can't find 'Surveyor 1' other than the MGS n MOCs...I don't "think" that is what you meant.

Let me know and I'll see if I can dig further and help.

Nice to be in the same thread with you again Zorgon

Bob...

[edit on 10-7-2008 by rhw007]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-7-2008 @ 02:26 AM by realshanti


Originally posted by DAVID64
I'm new here so first of all, hello!! Now, enough about me. why is it that nasa never sends a lander any where near one of these sights?




Probably cause they don't want to disturb the residents.. I think they've lost a rover or two that way before ....seriously interesting pics though, like these:

xenotechresearch.com...

only different - yet more..... ermm... "rocks"



[edit on 10-7-2008 by realshanti]



   copyright & usage 


<<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>






























































ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.010 seconds
Page processed in 0.188 seconds
6 total database queries (1)

(:)








The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownershipwho maintains
strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.






It looks like you're using some kind of software designed to block advertising while surfing our site.

We work very hard to provide an efficient Internet presence that services over 200,000 daily visits from people and automated web spiders. A large web site like this, that can handle that amount of traffic, is increasingly expensive to operate. Our only viable source of revenue (for now) are the ads displayed on each page.

If you enjoy our content, please enable our domain in your ad-blocking package.

more information       contact us

[hide this message]