Are the British God's chosen people?, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 7-7-2008 @ 02:41 PM by WatchRider
Originally posted by gazbom56
reply to
post by FlyersFan



Yeah I agree with you and I'm not trying to wind anybody up but I also read somewere the British and the American's were the two lost tribes of Isreal! Just a thought.

Gazbom.



I kind of agree with this, although I would say that as I am a Brit

The Ireland and England (Cornwall) are said to be the where the tribes from Israel (The Dan) are said to of landed. This kind of makes sense but they'd have to be superb sailors to make it through the med. and around to Britain back then. Having said that 'island and coastal' hopping could make it pretty feasible.
The Swedes and Norse are also said to of had the lost tribes settle their too.

As a nation we've ducked, dived, punched above our weight and managed to defy being conquered for a very long time. Putting it down to both divine favour and hard graft from the people is not unfeasible.
I think only the Swiss can rival us for remaining so untouched, so to speak.

As to whether divine favour will change is a matter of speculation.
But they say every nation has a destiny so perhaps its just the way it goes from what our ancestors did and where they came from.


reply posted on 7-7-2008 @ 02:51 PM by Shazam The Unbowed
Originally posted by gazbom56
reply to
post by Shazam The Unbowed



The Aboriginals are the inventors of the bbq, you my friend can hold on to the claim of corn on the cob!



No. Not even close.
Sorry, nice try, come again.


reply posted on 7-7-2008 @ 02:57 PM by Jibbs
Originally posted by Shazam The Unbowed
Originally posted by gazbom56
reply to
post by Shazam The Unbowed



The Aboriginals are the inventors of the bbq, you my friend can hold on to the claim of corn on the cob!



No. Not even close.
Sorry, nice try, come again.



The origins of both the activity of barbecue cooking and the word itself are somewhat obscure. Most etymologists believe that barbecue derives ultimately from the word barabicu found in the language of the Taíno people of the Caribbean. The word translates as sacred fire pit and is also spelled barbicoa or barabicoa.[2] The word describes a grill for cooking meat, consisting of a wooden platform resting on sticks. Traditional barbacoa involves digging a hole in the ground and placing some meat (usually a whole goat) with a pot underneath it, so that the juices can make a hearty broth. It is then covered with maguey leaves and coal and set alight. The cooking process takes a few hours. There is ample evidence that both the word and cooking technique migrated out of the Caribbean and into other cultures and languages, with the word moving from Caribbean dialects into Spanish, then French and English. The Oxford English Dictionary cites the first recorded use of the word in the English language in 1697 by the British buccaneer William Dampier.



reply posted on 7-7-2008 @ 02:58 PM by Anonymous ATS
I would have to agree with the poster who commented we are all God's chosen ones. But I would also have to agree with the OP in that Britain (and America) are part of God's divine plan for humanity.

The Behistun Stone, commissioned by Darius 1, is inscribed with a "history of the world," and describes the displacement of the tribes of the north, and their subsequent migration west to Europe and Britain. Accordingly, the Saxons are a corruption of "Isaac's Sons." The Cymry (or Cimmerians) are a corruption of "King Omry." These are what we know as the "Welsh" today. The Welsh language has many similarities to the Hebrew language. The Druid faith is quite similar to the Jewish faith. Many believe the three "Wise Men" were actually Druids who saw his "star in the east." The root word "brit" means covenant in Hebrew... hence, the covenant people.

British and French legends relate that Anne, the mother of the Virgin Mary, was a British (Silurian) princess, who fled to Palestine to escape an abusive husband, where she married Joaquim. Like Jesus, Mary was also born of a birth - the Immaculate Conception. Jesus attended the Druid university while in England (the lost years). Pontius Pilate, who is reputed to have been born in Scotland, and also attended the Druid university, may actually have known Jesus from their time together at the University. Jesus built a home for his mother at what is now Glastonbury, where Mary lived out her life after the ascension of Jesus.

Many say that the British "converted" to Christianity, but even St. Augustine found the British were already "Christians" when he came to convert them. Many say that Christianity stole holidays and whatnot from the Pagans. Neither is true. There was no reason to convert, as the Druids understood that Jesus was the fulfillment of their faith. They were waiting for Hesu, who we know as Jesus. No conversion. Nor did the Christians steal from the Pagans to appease them - the holidays were always the same. Rather, the Roman Catholic church corrupted all to legitimize their power.

I personally believe that the Grail legends pertain to Mother Mary, not the Magdalene. We know that the Mother Mary carried the holy blood of Christ! And the search for the grail in medieval legends would refer to the effort of King Arthur and his knights to find Mother Mary's grave in England, where she had been hidden away from the Jews and Romans.

The Jesus College at Oxford contains family trees for the Holy Family in England. Many British royalty and American elite are descended from this family tree, including King Arthur, Princess Diana, and even George Bush!

Also interesting, but less well researched, are legends that the mother of Joseph (the carpenter) was "Cleopatra of Jerusalem," daughter of Cleopatra and Julius Ceasar. After the death of her parents, the sons were killed, but the daughter was married off to an "Eastern prince," and Joseph was one of their sons. Later, she was either forced to divorce Joseph's father, or he was killed by Herod, who made Cleopatra of Jerusalem his wife.

If true, Jesus would have been the natural born heir to the Roman, Egyptian, Jewish/Israeli, and the British/Druid royal houses all in one. Imagine the political threat he would pose to the entire world. This would be especially threatening to the Herods, who were considered usurpers by many Jews at the time.

All quite fascinating really. Hope you found it interesting also.



reply posted on 7-7-2008 @ 03:00 PM by gazbom56
reply to post by Shazam The Unbowed



You should stop now mate while you still have some credibility.

It's the corn on the cob that did it for you, it's people like you that have dragged your wonderfull country to it's knees!

Gazbom.


reply posted on 7-7-2008 @ 03:00 PM by TheOmen
reply to post by Shazam The Unbowed



Ok the actual BBQ, by that I mean the modern metal apparatus was in fact in fact invented in the 1800s by cowboys in the US.

However, your claim of cheesecake is false.

Cheesecake has been recorded as far back as 776 B.C so USA was even the tadpole in its daddy.


reply posted on 7-7-2008 @ 03:15 PM by shuck
reply to post by Shazam The Unbowed



The reason that happened is because of discipline...we do what we are told...but unfortunately we have idiots making the descisions...but told to do something the Brits will do do it...no whining they will do it and get on with it and do it well...Americans should remember that their way of life came from the British all the values came from this small country!!

Are Brits the chosen ones ...I think yes!! we have endured, mixed and fought...and we take a measured response..that comes from the history and the mix of peoples ..that wanted to be British!!....

We had to learn ...values!! There is a personal thing with Brits that are proud of this country..and that dosen't matter what colour or creed....and we stick together when it comes to it ...we inevitably overcome!! and generally the right way!!

From Leeds but I hate football...I prefer watching the Brits cage fighting...the sportsmanship is way above many countries I have seen...

I Look at them this way hardly any hype or BS with the men..they get in there do their best knock seven bells out of each other and when its over ...the best man has won...and they hug and congratulate each other....its something I don't see much of in other countries!!....

Its the fairness I think !!.....


reply posted on 7-7-2008 @ 03:20 PM by Shazam The Unbowed
Originally posted by malganis


so why are we still eating it? why do we still love the smell of an english breakfast in the morning, a traditional roast dinner on a sunday, the yorkshire puddings coming out of the oven, etc? just because you don't like it doesn't mean that other people don't. in fact i happen to know a lot of foreigners (europeans, africans, etc) that enjoy traditional British food when they are here.

Cause y'all dont have any better sense. Plus the only people you could have gotten better cuisine from were the french and lets face it, that aint gonna happen.
(Incidentially the french learned all thier cooking techniques, originally from the italians.)



what do you think that Britain is just a big prison or something? we do what we like when we like as long as it doesn't break the law. what decent 'freedoms' do you have in the states then? being able to threaten each other with guns, oooh well i wish we could do that over here...

I can speak my mind in public without being arrested, or put on a police wacth list, even if those sentiments are highly offensive. Think you can? Try questioning if the holocaust happened, see how fast they throw you into jail. Or better yet, question in a public forum whether or not Islam is incompatible with British culture and see how fast your are arrested. Howsabout Freedom of the press? Remeber "dispatches"? Remeber when they almost got charged for simply airing what Islamic extremists had actually said because it was "defamation"? Are you aware that the British government has the right to size any child whose parents teach him or her "inappropiate beleifs" and who decides which beleifs are inappropiate? Why the very same gov. And as to "the right to threaten each other with guns" it just shows how little you understand your own rights. The right to bear arms has always been about one thing, ensuring the people have the abillity to revol and overthrow a tyrannical government. Tell me, when your government finally decides to come for you, what exactly will you fight them with?
But hey, keep beleiving you live in a free country. The fact that its also the country with the largest survelience network in the world, enahnced by Artificial intelligence, is only proof of how much your governent wants to protect you.



if the USA is so free then what the hell are all the police departments, FBI, NSA, PATRIOT acts, etc doing there?

Ohh goody.
I was hoping youd bring that up. Patriot act? Ill see your patriot act, and raise you one "Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act of 2000" Look it up. Makes the patriot act look like a dsney cartoon. (hint, this was actually one of the major inspirations for the patriot act, only the patriot act doesnt go nearly as far). Oh and as for the NSA FBI etc, you do realise I hope, that the powers granted to the various MI's as well as scotland yard, is considerably greater than that given to the FBI, CIA, etc?
I really love it when guys like you try this tack, cause the moment you realise the laws y'all have had on the books since before 9/11 gives your government more power over you than the laws we passed after 9/11, you usually have enough sense to keep quiet.


The only problem with Britain is that we are becoming too politically correct and touchy of hurting people's feelings. A couple of hundred years ago and the Royal Navy would have blown any boat out of the water that threatened it's sailors. That said, under threat in proper wartime the political correctness crap would go out of the window, just ask the Argies.

Wow, so capturing british soldiers isnt an act of war? Your military must be so proud of the value you place on them.


reply posted on 7-7-2008 @ 03:24 PM by Shazam The Unbowed
Originally posted by Jibbs



The origins of both the activity of barbecue cooking and the word itself are somewhat obscure. Most etymologists believe that barbecue derives ultimately from the word barabicu found in the language of the Taíno people of the Caribbean. The word translates as sacred fire pit and is also spelled barbicoa or barabicoa.[2] The word describes a grill for cooking meat, consisting of a wooden platform resting on sticks. Traditional barbacoa involves digging a hole in the ground and placing some meat (usually a whole goat) with a pot underneath it, so that the juices can make a hearty broth. It is then covered with maguey leaves and coal and set alight. The cooking process takes a few hours. There is ample evidence that both the word and cooking technique migrated out of the Caribbean and into other cultures and languages, with the word moving from Caribbean dialects into Spanish, then French and English. The Oxford English Dictionary cites the first recorded use of the word in the English language in 1697 by the British buccaneer William Dampier.


You might want to actually read those sources. What they describe is not bar-Bque. The whole "a few hours thing", gives it away.

American Bar-B-que,. while similar, and probably related, is unique in the world. It was invented in America. It is different that any other form of cooking. Also what your source describes isnt a bar-b-que, its a luai.

BTW what source did you use?



reply posted on 7-7-2008 @ 03:29 PM by TheOmen
reply to post by Shazam The Unbowed



So you have to pick the worst of what I said then?

Nevermind kid, I'll leave ya to fight a losing battle.


reply posted on 7-7-2008 @ 03:29 PM by Shazam The Unbowed
Originally posted by TheOmen
reply to
post by Shazam The Unbowed



Ok the actual BBQ, by that I mean the modern metal apparatus was in fact in fact invented in the 1800s by cowboys in the US.

However, your claim of cheesecake is false.

Cheesecake has been recorded as far back as 776 B.C so USA was even the tadpole in its daddy.


Slow cooked meat, roasted low and slow for 6-18 hours at a time, was invented in america due to pecularities in the food supply. It was an adaptation to harsh circumstances. While related to other forms of cooking, only americans can do it for 18 hours at a time.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



The One Party System replaces the Two Party system in the U.S.
  Posted 2 days ago with 14 member flags
Virginia House Bill 1160: Nullify the NDAA
  Posted 16 days ago with 10 member flags
The Solution
  Posted 5 days ago with 7 member flags
2010 Hate Crime Statistics
  Posted 15 days ago with 2 member flags
Ron Paul\'s fans are building like legos
  Posted 15 days ago with 1 member flags
With all this talk about possible voter fraud...
  Posted 1 days ago with 1 member flags