 |
|
Topic started on 6-7-2008 @ 03:39 PM by Truther
|
       
Just watching the builing 7 documentary on bbc 2, there actually agreeing that the building could not have folded like that without demolition, this
is the bbc now, a mainstream tv channel, unbelievable!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 03:44 PM by Truther
|
Here is a clip of the documentary..
news.bbc.co.uk...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 03:50 PM by mr-lizard
|
 
Maybe they're covering themselves when it is revealed that it REALLY was actually demolished, so the BBC can say 'hey despite the fact that we've
always belittled the conspiracy theorists, this time we're digging ourselves out of our news grave* by gaining some supporters from the conspiracy
crowd, aren't we nice...'
Or maybe it was different journalist/reporter, someone with balls as opposed to this cowardly journalism we've seen since 9/11.
Not sure what to believe here but very interesting to say the least.
But glad to know that the mainstream are getting a glimpse at the real truth that 9/11 was an inside job....
*Thanks Chris Morris
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 03:53 PM by Truther
|
reply to post by mr-lizard
Yes. and you can be sure there are millions watching this in the UK and Ireland, hopfully it will open a few peoples eyes..
I do wonder though, why are they admiting demolition?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 03:57 PM by Chriswok
|
Well that kids response to Richard Clarke was pretty mature...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 03:58 PM by Truther
|
reply to post by Chriswok
Sorry, richard clarke? fill me in.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 04:00 PM by Chriswok
|
Might got his name wrong, sorry. Some White House adviser basically said that the Government wasn't able to carry out the conspiracy due to two
things:
1. Everyone knows Government's are incompetent
2. No one can keep a secret.
Then the kid basically said 'I don't #ing care' haha thought that was pretty funny. Had a feeling BBC would leave the documentary showing
conspiracy theorists as crackpots though.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 04:22 PM by Breifne
|
Possibly the most open MSM orientated 911 documentary I have seen yet.
Whilst they certainly were not definitive in their analysis and conclusions, they opened the floor to all sides who done justice to the argument. It
will spark greater awareness in the issue, and if nothing else, get more people asking more questions about the validity of the official story.
Dylan Avery - that kid digs his own grave IMO. There is presenting an alternative view professionally and thoroughly, then there is shoving his side
down the throat of the interviewer with a side helping of expletives. It may appear to be fun but it does the alternative theories no justice at
all.
I missed the first quarter of the show, but from what I have seen of the remainder, its worth a watch.
I wonder if other MSM's will actually see a market in this type of show in the future, given that they could have avoided the subject in favour of
something else!! Wonder what the ratings were?
Breifne.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 05:09 PM by Being_From_Earth
|
Its the BBC.They have a range of reporters and producers who report different things on different subjects.
It wont be on there mainstream news because of the people in control of that.
But the BBC make all sorts of documentary's on different things.
Its actually a program called the conspiracy files so they deal with all things in regard to that.They put it in that section specifically so its not
considered mainstream news and/or truth.
There is actually some reporters and producers at the bbc who report objectively however of course there work will be reviewed before its published by
the controllers.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 05:12 PM by Boniouk06
|
  
hmm i dunno, i think the BBC did what they always do, start out agreeing with the conspiracy, going along with it, then in the last half hour,
interview people who say its nonsense and make out like its funny that some people believe in it. they interviewed that guy who said they tested for
demolition traces and found nothing, not a thing. Smoke coming out, burnt steel etc, it was fire blah blah. The bbc ALWAYS make out like we're stupid
for believing it. They did it last wednedsay too with the Welsh UFO thing.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 05:13 PM by jprophet420
|
Originally posted by Chriswok
Might got his name wrong, sorry. Some White House adviser basically said that the Government wasn't able to carry out the conspiracy due to two
things:
1. Everyone knows Government's are incompetent
2. No one can keep a secret.
Then the kid basically said 'I don't #ing care' haha thought that was pretty funny. Had a feeling BBC would leave the documentary showing
conspiracy theorists as crackpots though. 
As I've pointed out many times before, that line of logic is 100% unfounded. The Manhattan project consisted of an entire town of people where the
conspiracy didn't leak.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 05:27 PM by fastfingersfunk
|
this isn't BBC's stance, they are just interviewing truthers. other people on there say a CD isn't what happened. so how did you derive that BBC
agrees?
here is video/audio of WTC7 collapsing from less than two blocks away. not a single explosion such as a controlled demolition can be heard. and the
commentator says "what we have been fearing all afternoon apparently has happened, WTC7 collapsed". controlled demolition debunked, no
explosions.
here is what a controlled demolition sounds like. NO COMPARISON.
[edit on 6-7-2008 by fastfingersfunk]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 06:09 PM by Griff
|
Originally posted by fastfingersfunk
here is video/audio of WTC7 collapsing from less than two blocks away. not a single explosion such as a controlled demolition can be heard. and the
commentator says "what we have been fearing all afternoon apparently has happened, WTC7 collapsed". controlled demolition debunked, no
explosions.

For being "less than two blocks away", the falling building is rather quiet. Doncha think?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 06:13 PM by TheMoonIsHollow
|
I thought it was a very clever hack job done up mostly to make the loosechange boys look bad. Just because someone shows you their arse, you don't
have to enter that into a documentary. There is agenda in all of the choices made.
I think it was better in some parts than I could have hoped for, but when it comes to the Beeb there is always an agenda at work, and sometimes we got
to keep studying a programme or series till we work out what the real end purpose was.
At first I was truly, truly hoping that they would come out with all the truth. I suppose the good parts of the documentary were a beginning.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 06:20 PM by fastfingersfunk
|
Originally posted by Griff
For being "less than two blocks away", the falling building is rather quiet. Doncha think? 
there are no explosions either.
for the sake of debate let's call it 5 blocks. still no explosions.
[edit on 6-7-2008 by fastfingersfunk]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 06:30 PM by Griff
|
  
Originally posted by fastfingersfunk
there are no explosions either.
for the sake of debate let's call it 5 blocks. still no explosions.

You're missing the most important part. There is no noise of a 47 storey building falling either.
Listen to ANY one of the videos you post about CDs. You can clearly hear the thunderous noise of the buildings falling. Not so with ANY video of WTC
7 collapsing. Was there some type of sound black hole that sucked up all the noise?
If you dare, prove me wrong. Post a video of WTC 7 collapsing where we can hear the collapse. Oh, and since CD explosives happen a few seconds
before collapse, you need to include that in the video also. I've asked for this before only to be ignored.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 06:44 PM by fastfingersfunk
|
reply to post by Griff
there are no explosions. look at the CD i posted, you would hear that five blocks away. and when the building is falling and the explosions stop you
can barely hear the building fall. i can hear the building fall in this WTC7 video, it's a rumble. explosions are louder than the building falling
it so you would hear it. no explosions, sorry.
if you dare, post a video of WTC7 falling with explosions. i already posted one that doesn't have explosions and you can hear the building fall.
and this video starts well before the building collapsed, you would hear explosions. in the CD i posted, there are still exposions as it's
falling.
[edit on 6-7-2008 by fastfingersfunk]
[edit on 6-7-2008 by fastfingersfunk]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 06:49 PM by Shotabel
|
reply to post by fastfingersfunk
I was always under the impression that the loud booms you heard at those controlled demos were done for the "show" of it. Is that not so?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 06:51 PM by Griff
|
Originally posted by fastfingersfunk
if you dare, post a video of WTC7 falling with explosions. i already posted one that doesn't have explosions and you can hear the building fall.

It must be that I'm def because I can't hear it. Saying that you can hear it doesn't make it the truth. I can NOT hear any part of a 47 storey
building falling in that video or any other video of WTC 7 falling. Like I said, I might be missing something, but you have not produced it.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 06:54 PM by fastfingersfunk
|
Originally posted by Shotabel
reply to post by fastfingersfunk
I was always under the impression that the loud booms you heard at those controlled demos were done for the "show" of it. Is that not so?

not for show, explosives are used, explosives explode.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |