posted on Jul, 11 2008 @ 12:43 AM
I applaud your diligence in doing your best to provide the material that people have requested... also, if indeed true, your efforts to have this
piece of "skin" analyzed.
The support-story of the neighbor was a good touch, and a tad more believable than Dan's wifey, and your ability to respond and deal with the flaming
also makes you more credible in my book. But I still find this story very hard to believe due to the aforementioned questions in previous posts.
A few questions of my own:
I have to admit that I scanned the middle and latter part of this thread swiftly and failed to find the pictures requested of close, detailed shots of
the "skin". Where are those (forgive me if they are here somewhere)?
The pictures you did provide, the one that showed the piece of frame/rail missing... why is the background clear and the actual part of interest
blurry? This compounded with the fact that I could not locate any detailed pictures of the skin confuse me. Couldn't they have been taken in the same
time that you allocated for this task? It only takes a few minutes to set it up, put something in the composition for scale, then snap away. Yet the
three most critical aspects of your story have been blurry, too small and of low quality to examine, and held up due to copyright issues.
Though it does make it a tad bit more convincing, the whole issue of the neighbors cannot be proved, or more pointedly, it doesn't mean much as the
story could have been entirely fabricated.
The only thing keeping me from total disbelief has been your manner in this thread, your cooperation, and the drive to get it examined professionaly
(if it is true).
[edit on 11-7-2008 by astronomine] Grammatical issues
[edit on 11-7-2008 by astronomine]