Originally posted by ThreeDeuce
Dan, the 42 pages of posting that I have read has kept me glued to this computer.

If you go to Dan's page and pick 'in thread' you can read only Dan's postings in this thread.


Hope this helps.

Have a nice day!

Originally posted by Denied

Originally posted by ThreeDeuce

If you are skeptic, or you just think this is a hoax, that is okay. But, keep it to yourself

I dont agree with that at all, every member has free speech within the T&C, so Dan can tell his tale, but if someone disagrees, or wants to point out inconsistencies, we should keep it to ourselfs!!??

Thats not Denying Ignorance.


[edit on 17-7-2008 by Denied]

When I was on the 20th page of people blindly opposing Dan, and calling him names, and berating him, I realized how futile it was. Instead of this thread becoming a place for discussion, it became an I'm right and you're wrong argument. I'm sorry but that is for children. I definitely saw the line as crossed when people were taking pot shots at his wife.

Remember, there is a thing called common decency. And, just because you do not believe something, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. You always need to remember how dumb the human race really is. Do not forget that we use to think the world was flat, and we were the center of the universe.

Its very possible that all of the skeptics are completely wrong in their beliefs, yet they challenge Dan's beliefs and call him a liar. This just shows how closed-minded we are as a species.

What I'm getting at, is we need more of a scientific analysis of the information that we have, in order to determine the validity and scope of this event.

The thing I find the most hilarious, are the people who on the first couple of pages were calling Dan a liar, and saying this event was a hoax. Yet, dozens of pages later, they are still glued to the thread and still responding.......

HELLO...... its okay if you don't agree, we get the point. Get over it.
The OP is not attempting to sway your opinion, all he is doing is answering questions and giving the facts of his recollection to the best of his ability.

If you think this event is fake, it is okay to voice your opinion and state the reasons that you think it might be fake. But, don't fill the thread with your mindless rantings in order to enlighten individuals to your perspective. Leave the thread. This world is too full of nonbelievers.

I don't believe Obama will be a good president, but I could be wrong. So could you be.

---

---

Perhaps this creature didn't know what it was doing was threatening. Maybe it didn't know being in a house it would instantly get stabbed. It could have been ignorant to our human ways. I can see if it was a human intruder and they had a knife or something but you didn't know this things intentions, maybe you could have just yelled and it would have left. I mean this is a creature, as you're describing it, we've never seen or discovered before and you instantly tried to murder it because it made a gesture towards you. You even say it tried to get away and leave but you kept striking it

Edit: I guess he stopped replying after he was found out to be lying about certain aspects

[edit on 17-7-2008 by qvaris]

[edit on 17-7-2008 by qvaris]

Thats why its pointless trying to point these things out, Everybody is a so called expert, I Don't claim to be.
The perspective is a good point and thats what I was trying to point out.

Good post Charlie.
All you have to do is use your brain a bit to see how utterly ridiculous this has become.
I actually agree with Dan now, He should've kept it in rats seeing as how this is his treatment.

[edit on 17-7-2008 by Dar Kuma]

I'm a bit embarrassed about the way the photos have been compared.

It was me who brought the Western Hebrides thread up (at this stage) and pointed to the picture.

What I was really trying to get at was Dan's frame of mind and the way he got defensive when he thought someone was suggesting that he wasn't really married.

He was accused on that thread of perpetrating a hoax but was at least as concerned to prove he was married as to prove he wasn't a hoaxer.

I don't understand how he thought the photo (on either occassion) proved anything or why he'd go to those lengths. Or, actually, why he didn't just use the same photo here as he had before.

I've taken an interest in a couple of Dan's new threads because of all this, and it's almost like reading posts from a different person. Although a few 'Danisms' do creep in.

If someone is prepared to go up and meet him, I'd be interested to know what they made of him.

He's been giving out a lot of advice, which sounds very knowledgeable but if he is a fantasist perhaps what he's saying should be checked. People's well-being could depend on it.

All this talk about the ring. I would have at least thought that to prove marriage, the pic would be of two hands, Dan and his wife, each with a ring -- in one pic.

I must re phrase

this site isn't ridiculous, just some member have become ridiculous.

My bones tell me Dan Tanna is not married. The story is great but, it doesn't pass the smell test. Now write 14 more and publish the book!

He's making reference to the knife as good news.

Yet the knife is missing. Meaning gone. or nothing.

without good news there is nothing therefore

No news is good news with out gary gnu. NO news.

There is nothing here, it's a story and that's all folks.

This took me time to figure out.

My last 3 posts are quite sincere.