Originally posted by mirageofdeceit
Any human rights insofar as religious freedom (i.e. the freedom not to participate)? Seems the laws don't always work both ways.
Good point here, but I think I should make a few points based upon the following parts of the
Constitution & the Bill of Rights:
Article 6, Clause 3:
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of
the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be
required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
1st Amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Well, to me it looks like this: If the government cannot
lawfully demand any "religious Test" of its Officers & cannot
lawfully deny
People the Right to exercise Religion as they see fit, then neither should the schools because they operate under a lesser authority than the
government (as illegitimate as it is anyway). Therefore, it should be the teacher and/or administrators who support/enforce these detentions to be
removed from their jobs & brought to trial for violation of Human Rights under the Constitution.
But since this happened in England, my attitude is such that Americans should just let England deal with it in their own way...Of course, if England
has any laws supporting a similar "choice of religion" in either their own laws or through their UN Treaties that support Human Rights (according to
any clauses dealing with religion), that would be the way to go.
But then again, I think the band Pink Floyd summed it up in a song from their "Dark of the Moon" album: "Hanging on in quiet desperation is the
English way."
Then again, consider that the source is Faux News...
ZindoDoone has the right idea, but I just backed it up with proper justification under the Supreme Law...If this had happened in America instead of
England.
However, I have nothing against teaching diversity of cultures in Social Studies...Even teaching some of the differing doctrines of religions is
nothing to worry about. At least, not until it gets down to this point, to
force the kids into practicing religious rituals that the kids
don't believe in.
'Nuff said.