It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
reply to post by pavil
Oh i see. So....there wasnt that many white people who owned slaves in Colonial America?
because... OFFICIAL sources say otherwise. Posting a link to a website with zero credibility hardly offers proof that slavery wasnt a rampant issue.
Lots of white people owned slaves in colonial america
Of all 1,515,605 families in the 15 slave states, 393,967 held slaves (roughly one in four),[6] amounting to 8% of all American families.[
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
[
i said lots
a definition of "lots" can vary, but for me, it means too many
what is too many?
Once again - can vary
but for me, "too many" is the # it took to start the civil war
so - LOTS of white people owned slaves.
very simple, non-deceptive language
im sorry that you struggle so much to keep up - i really am. At first i thought this would be a good debate, but the more and more you troll, name call, and derail it, the more it becomes the same ol thing we've been dealing with in this forum since its inception.
The whole Wright Fiasco is a prime example.
Originally posted by xmotex
The whole Wright Fiasco is a prime example.
It's the perfect example of what I am talking about.
The "reverend Wright is a racist" thing was a joke: he's a "racist" because he believes whites have oppressed blacks in this country?
Left brain is logical and analytical. Object oriented means the student learns from an object. From the solitude of the cradle with objects being hung over his or her head to help them determine colors and shape to the solitude in a carol in a PhD program stuffed off somewhere in a corner in absolute quietness to absorb from the object. From a block to a book, an object. That is one way of learning, but it is only one way of learning.
African and African-American children have a different way of learning.
They are right brained, subject oriented in their learning style. Right brain that means creative and intuitive. Subject oriented means they learn from a subject, not an object. They learn from a person. Some of you are old enough, I see your hair color, to remember when the NAACP won that tremendous desegregation case back in 1954 and when the schools were desegregated. They were never integrated. When they were desegregated in Philadelphia, several of the white teachers in my school freaked out. Why? Because black kids wouldn't stay in their place. Over there behind the desk, black kids climbed up all on them.
Because they learn from a subject, not from an object. Tell me a story. They have a different way of learning. Those same children who have difficulty reading from an object and who are labeled EMH, DMH and ADD. Those children can say every word from every song on every hip hop radio station half of who's words the average adult here tonight cannot understand. Why? Because they come from a right-brained creative oral culture like the (greos) in Africa who can go for two or three days as oral repositories of a people's history and like the oral tradition which passed down the first five book in our Jewish bible, our Christian Bible, our Hebrew bible long before there was a written Hebrew script or alphabet. And repeat incredulously long passages like Psalm 119 using mnemonic devices using eight line stanzas. Each stanza starting with a different letter of the alphabet. That is a different way of learning. It's not deficient, it is just different. Somebody say different. I believe that a change is going to come because many of us are committed to changing how we see other people who are different.
African music is different from European piano music. It is not deficient, it is different. In most school systems today, the way most of us over 40 years of age were taught is still being taught. We were taught a European paradigm as if Europe had the only music that there was in the world. As a matter of fact, if you just say the term, classical music.
Today, most here, use of that term will automatically refer to Beethoven, Tchaikovsky, and already cited Mozart and Handel. European musicians. From grammar school to graduate school, we are taught in four, four time. That the dominant beat is on one and three. Our band directors, our choir directors, our orchestra director start us off how?
And One, two, three, four. One, two, three. Now, that's the European dominant beat. For African and African-Americans, it is not one and three, it is two and four. I don't have to teach you. Listen to black people clap to this song. Glory, glory hallelujah, you are clapping on beats two and four. If you got some white friends, they'll be clapping like this. You say they can't clap. Yes, they can. They clap in a different way. It's the same fact holds true with six eight time. Europeans stress one, two, three, four, five, six. One, two, three, four, five, six. Dum dum, dum, dum, dum. The stress is on one and four. Not for black people. When you got six eight time, blacks stress two three and five six.
That's an undeniable historical fact, but people have turned the definition of "racist" around until it means whatever they want it to mean
Apparently racism now means "any statement mentioning race that makes me feel bad" - we're supposed to believe that some loud preacher spewing hyperbole & odd theories about AIDS is morally equivalent to centuries of slavery, Jim Crow, etc.
Obama is held to a higher standard than other politicians, largely due to his race IMHO.
" Because if we are willing to work for it, and fight for it, and believe in it, then I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment when we began to provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless; this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal; this was the moment when we ended a war and secured our nation and restored our image as the last, best hope on Earth. This was the moment - this was the time - when we came together to remake this great nation so that it may always reflect our very best selves, and our highest ideals. Thank you, God Bless you, and may God Bless the United States of America."
Originally posted by Becker44
reply to post by Andrew E. Wiggin
OK I'll enter your world Andy.
I'd like to start with a question. Forgive me for not reading your 2,346 posts about the Messiah but others may agree they all sound remarkably alike.
Could we classify you as part of Generation "Y"?
Are you supporting this man because all the others are part of that group that always "keeps you down, or from getting ahead in life"?
We'll start out easy and see where this leads.
Originally posted by pavil
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
reply to post by pavil
Oh i see. So....there wasnt that many white people who owned slaves in Colonial America?
because... OFFICIAL sources say otherwise. Posting a link to a website with zero credibility hardly offers proof that slavery wasnt a rampant issue.
Lots of white people owned slaves in colonial america
Now you are being just downright dense. To use your Official Wiki Source:
Of all 1,515,605 families in the 15 slave states, 393,967 held slaves (roughly one in four),[6] amounting to 8% of all American families.[
How that translates into someone thinking that every white person or even lots owned slaves is beyond me. Even using your sources the best you can say is that 1 in 4 southern familes owned slaves. That, while condemnable, is not lots, when it only amounted to 8% of all American families.
Darn, Shazam The Unbowed and FlyersFan beat me to the punch!
[edit on 7-7-2008 by pavil]
Originally posted by tazm_99
Have you considered that there were forms of slavery in Europe as well? You can wiki that too! Not only were there Europeans that owned slaves, but they also assisted in the African slave trade. Also Through out history, parts of Europe have had slaves of many different ethnic backgrounds.
Originally posted by jamie83
Originally posted by tazm_99
Have you considered that there were forms of slavery in Europe as well? You can wiki that too! Not only were there Europeans that owned slaves, but they also assisted in the African slave trade. Also Through out history, parts of Europe have had slaves of many different ethnic backgrounds.
I'm a little rusty on my history, but didn't Egyptians have jews as slaves? And isn't Egypt part of Africa?
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
Then i realized something: Its a sham.
It is true that big business creates jobs.
But if big business is for the little guy - then why are so many illegal immigrants employed in this country.
Unrelated: Why are so many americans unemployed?
Tax cuts for the rich? Why? What do they do with them?
They export jobs to mexico and china
they hire illegal immigrants back home
they charge ridiculous sums of money for life saving operations
all in the name of getting richer.
Well im sorry, but there is a limit to big business being for the little guy.
There comes a time when they are longer helping people, rather hurting them.
Enron.
Tyco.
The lending industry as a whole
"why the hell did my interest rate jump to eleventy-billion % this month"?
-credit card company
"well sir, technically, and if you read your contract its there, you missed the coefficient of the tanjents circumference, creating a bi-product that reflected the light from venus. So. Thanks for your money, have a great day.
5 years later, the credit card company is garnishing the guys wages because he cant afford his 5000 dollar balance on a 500 dollar limit credit card.