Originally posted by mybigunit
Whether you like him or not Hitler is VERY fundamental to our modern history. Where do you think a lot of our modern technology we use today came
from in both medicine and military. Not only that he nearly took over the whole damn world. Its a private museum also. To disregard Hitler from
history is to disregard Napoleon, Alexander the Great, The Roman Empire, and on and on...you dont think those world conquerors didnt mass kill along
the way?
That is exactly what I was thinking.
Again...looking at it from that standpoint the display is perfectly reasonable. I was just examining my own personal feelings (or trying to consider
that of those he may have directly affected) about Hitler as a man being displayed in a museum. I don't feel I should be attacked though for
questioning whether or not the display should exist at all. I am after all, trying to rationally look at the situation and remain objective to some
degree. My personal feeling about the statute are just that. I am not planning a protest regardless of whatever conclusion I arrive at.
Personally I strongly disagree with what the Nazi party stood for including what they did. That is my personal view. I also don't think they should
be scrubbed from the history books. However I was also considering if a Hitler statue or wax figure could be seen as paying tribute to this man or
just simply marking his chapter in history.
I certainly agree that he did have a major impact in world history. His actions lead to other reactions and straight on into present day. Particularly
the middle-east.
I don't think I would have the stones to rush in and rip the figures head off.
That I think is wrong.
That figure was well-made, and I don't agree with destroying art.
- Lee