It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
...the rituals and holidays like christmas and easter are all the fault of the catholics...
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by VIKINGANT
...But the garden variety practicing Catholic most definately...
If we want to be Christian, ourselves, we need to be able to recognize our brothers, no matter what brand name is on the sign in front of their church
Originally posted by jmdewey60
I was talking about the same post, that you made, about how the church freaked you out with the gruesome statues and mean Nuns.
What I was trying to say is that was apparently something your parents put you through. It seems to have had a negative impression on you.
I do not remember outing anyone as a Catholic.
If you could not figure out that he was a Catholic, on your own, well, I do not see any really good reason for that.
I am trying to "support" civil discourse and finding common ground with our fellow man.
Then direct your sugar coated reprisals to the one that instigated the whole thing and quit playing kitchen psychologist over what you think my parents did or the catholic church.
The hatred toward it is tangible, much like Christ before His accusers.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
I am glad that your parents did not knowingly subject you to harsh treatment.
I guess I need to go back and figure out who instigated the whole thing.
I will have to make a list of people not to offer advice to and put you on it.
I thought my "sugar coated reprisal" would not seem so remarkable, in the midst of what seemed, to me, to be a little flaming war.
I will have to make a list of people not to offer advice to and put you on it.
...telling the world that King Arthur was an ancient English king...
Likely the Jesuits create the Mormons and others...
Originally posted by jmdewey60
That would be an oxymoron because Arthur fought the "English".
[edit on 11-7-2008 by jmdewey60]
When one such group all claiming to be Christians winning the spoils of war, naturally they also win the rights to the way it is written in our history books.
Everything you know about British and Irish ancestry is wrong. Our ancestors were Basques, not Celts. The Celts were not wiped out by the Anglo-Saxons, in fact neither had much impact on the genetic stock of these islands…
The genetic evidence shows that three quarters of our ancestors came to this corner of Europe as hunter-gatherers, between 15,000 and 7,500 years ago, after the melting of the ice caps but before the land broke away from the mainland and divided into islands. Our subsequent separation from Europe has preserved a genetic time capsule of southwestern Europe during the ice age, which we share most closely with the former ice-age refuge in the Basque country. The first settlers were unlikely to have spoken a Celtic language but possibly a tongue related to the unique Basque language.
Another wave of immigration arrived during the Neolithic period, when farming developed about 6,500 years ago. But the English still derive most of their current gene pool from the same early Basque source as the Irish, Welsh and Scots. These figures are at odds with the modern perceptions of Celtic and Anglo-Saxon ethnicity based on more recent invasions. There were many later invasions, as well as less violent immigrations, and each left a genetic signal, but no individual event contributed much more than 5 per cent to our modern genetic mix…
based on the overall genetic perspective of the British, it seems that Celts, Belgians, Angles, Jutes, Saxons, Vikings and Normans were all immigrant minorities compared with the Basque pioneers, who first ventured into the empty, chilly lands so recently vacated by the great ice sheets.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by Conspiriology
When one such group all claiming to be Christians winning the spoils of war, naturally they also win the rights to the way it is written in our history books.
This is not a King Arthur thread, so I decline to discus this further (right now), but you do understand one point.
What comes next is what you do with that power.
How you deal with it could be an indication of how much Christianity you can claim for yourself while at the same time running down people who are not as guilty as yourself.
This is not a King Arthur thread, so I decline to discus this further (right now),
Don't you mean how THEY deal with it could be an indication of how much Christianity THEY could claim for themselves? or are you speaking to me?
This would have been a good answer for Robhaidheuch to say to you then wouldn't it. As for the correction, a simple thank you would have sufficed.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
There is a difference between referring to King Arthur in relation to topic, but nit- picking over details of that illustration may be off-topic.
Thats was what I meant.
Anyway, Saxon were these people in the Story, but the English are Anglo-Saxon, so I was making a generalization.
I do not think you want to divorce the Saxons from the English, do you?
As for the Story, I can claim to have not just read the normal popular versions, but a slightly difficult version, the old Le Morte d'Arthur.
So I am not ignorant and in need of correction.(take a look at my avatar)
You can disagree with my generalization and I will not argue with you about it.
England has also plundered the history of Europe's oldest nation state, telling the world that King Arthur was an ancient English king and that the legendary Robin Hood was an Englishman. The legendary tales of Robin Hood were, in fact, based on the life of Sir William Wallace (Braveheart).
The tales of Arthur are actually based on the Christian struggle for survival against the druidic pagans who practised human blood sacrafice to their demonic deities.
1 Timothy.4:1 Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;
4:2 Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;4:3 Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth.
Matthew 13:55 Is not this the carpenter's son? is not his mother called Mary? and his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas?
13:56 And his sisters, are they not all with us? Whence then hath this man all these things?
If Mary gave birth to God,she'd be God to.
Isaiah 43:10 Ye are my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me.
1 Corinthians 3:9 For we are labourers together with God: ye are God's husbandry, ye are God's building.10 According to the grace of God which is given unto me, as a wise masterbuilder, I have laid the foundation, and another buildeth thereon. But let every man take heed how he buildeth thereupon.11 For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ.
Deuteronomy 32:4 He is the Rock, his work is perfect: for all his ways are judgment: a God of truth and without iniquity, just and right is he.
Psalms 18:2 The LORD is my rock, and my fortress, and my deliverer; my God, my strength, in whom I will trust; my buckler, and the horn of my salvation, and my high tower....31 For who is God save the LORD? or who is a rock save our God?
1 Timothy 2:5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.
I John 2:1, ...And if any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous.