Triangle UFO spotted over Coventry, page 2

privacy

Pages: << 1 2 3 4 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times

reply posted on 5-7-2008 @ 05:46 AM by Grey Magic

the first one was strange because of the gun shot/fireworks I hear halfway the video.

Like a previous poster said, it doesn't seem solid.

[edit on 5-7-2008 by Grey Magic]

reply posted on 5-7-2008 @ 08:16 AM by Anonymous ATS

Dear Friends,

The recent sightings in london were test flights of a new model of anti-gravity craft produced by the USA. The two groups of craft met up over england after launching from NT Australia and from area 51 USA.

These craft have the capacity to cirlce the earth in approximately 45 minutes. They run on a combination of a cold electric motor powering the anti-gravity engine. both these human inventions were invented in the 1960's and were quickly removed from public domain.

A search on either will provide proof of this and accompanying lectures from those involved. All publicly available if you know where to look.
Most UFO's encountered are ours however some other craft from other countries or unauthorised flights may be responsible for the few sightings I have heard about that were not authorised flights.

Stay tuned. Chuck..

reply posted on 5-7-2008 @ 08:31 AM by tide88

reply to post by Grey Magic

If the first object is not a triangle it could be anything. Flares, fireworks, etc. Why does everyone have such crappy cameras. Hell I can get a better picture shooting video with my sony cybershot. At least in 5 years everyone will have HD video camera's so we should all be seeing way better video by then.

reply posted on 5-7-2008 @ 10:42 AM by candyfloss

I live in Cov,check the sky everynight-nothing at the moment.Bear in mind Cov is between two airports and had alot of air traffic.These vids are teenagers faking it nothing more .Don't waste your time.

reply posted on 5-7-2008 @ 11:18 AM by RudyRed

reply to post by Anonymous ATS

Could be.....but the obvious questions are, how do you know this and do you have any proof? Being anonymous takes away from your credibility, BTW. Would this be the "Aurora" or something else entirely?
RR

reply posted on 5-7-2008 @ 11:26 AM by sherpa

reply to post by Anonymous ATS

These craft have the capacity to cirlce the earth in approximately 45 minutes. They run on a combination of a cold electric motor powering the anti-gravity engine. both these human inventions were invented in the 1960's and were quickly removed from public domain.

A cold electric engine, are you talking about nitrogen cooled semiconducters here ?

The 1960's, are you referring to Thomas Townsend Brown and the Bifield-Brown effect ?

If they were in the public domain then there should be some reference somewhere perhaps you could provide a link and if you have not already perhaps you would like to join ATS.

Welcome to ATS Chuck.

reply posted on 5-7-2008 @ 11:55 AM by danogee

allo all

Would just like to add my my two penneth

Regarding the first video, it sure does seem to be quite cloudy, therefore, could it actually be one solid object, ie: a triangle, that is actually behind the cloud cover but with the three lights bright enough to be seen through the clouds?

Maybe; maybe not, can't really see it too clearly. Just a thought.

Cheers

reply posted on 5-7-2008 @ 01:19 PM by NBFX1

looks like these e.t's are flaunting there superiority in our sky's again i dont think there up to anything really just passing the time . you know when they are among them selves they are all the same but if they come unto our planet they will look as gods among us so i think that builds there ego's and thats what they like to do for there own fun, sturr up a beez nest here on earth and get gratitude from that

reply posted on 5-7-2008 @ 03:00 PM by HaTaX

Biggest problem I have with sightings being written off as a top secret government project is, why are they lit up at all then? I would think if this was a top secret project and they do not want the general public to observe them, then what gives with the blatant light transmissions? Perhaps it's something to do with the technology that propels them that light is generated as a byproduct and there isn't much that you can do about it... Or something like that...

Anyway, the first video is neat! Seems like there's more and more of these appearing, I'm still out on whether that's a good thing or a bad thing. Any way you slice "why" these sightings are occurring, I see it as a roll of the dice 50/50 if it's good or bad for us.

reply posted on 5-7-2008 @ 03:09 PM by theukman

The first video I beleive to be fake. I live not far from coventry (arount 30 min drive) and just they way they are speaking sounds sarcastic to me. Thats the way we in the midlands talk whilst taking the P**$. And I would wager a good bet that they are radio masts that there are quite a few around that area. The taller ones have lights top and quater way up and the smaller ones have just a light on the top. Any one else on here from the midlands will probably be able to back me up on this.

reply posted on 5-7-2008 @ 03:18 PM by GorehoundLarry

Could be ANYTHING.

I was thinking flares, IMO.

Seems like thanks to the media, anyone who sees a light in the sky, it must be something beyond our world.

I'm tired of footage like this. Time for something solid and I don't think I'm alone on this matter..

reply posted on 5-7-2008 @ 04:24 PM by danogee

Allo theukman

Yeah, i am from round your neck of the woods and i agree it does sound like they are "tekin the pee", but i would allow for the fact that it doesn't sound like a true local accent so who knows?

[edit on 5-7-2008 by danogee]

reply posted on 5-7-2008 @ 04:32 PM by danogee

Allo HaTax

Do you not feel that if there was a conspiracy invovling advanced human technology and genuine ET craft , that one of the best methods of obscuring the truth would be to confuse any witnesses to such craft. In other words, if it's human, those responsible would say something like "yeah, put the lights on, they'll just argue whether it's us, or one of the things we got the tech from in the first place!"

Anyway, all said and done, we need more than lights in the sky; or lights on poles. Tee Hee

[edit on 5-7-2008 by danogee]

reply posted on 5-7-2008 @ 06:10 PM by DavidU

Baby steps, gentlemen... baby steps. We're getting an influx of cell-phone footage, it's only a matter of time before THAT person with the tripod, and HD camcorder captures something amazing. Flagged.

reply posted on 5-7-2008 @ 07:00 PM by Anonymous ATS

I have 40 one hour videos of these objects . They have been visiting me since March 2007. I have been filming these objects since August 2007

YouTube Link

Here's my youtube account : www.youtube.com...

reply posted on 5-7-2008 @ 08:18 PM by Scramjet76

reply to post by Anonymous ATS

These craft have the capacity to cirlce the earth in approximately 45 minutes.

That's a pretty serious claim.

The SR-71 (Blackbird) would take something like 11 hrs (if you do the math and forget about stopping for fuel) to circle the world. Care to revise your statement?

reply posted on 5-7-2008 @ 09:08 PM by mbkennel

This looks just like Chinese Fire Lanterns.

There were waves of them before in UK. Apparently popular now for weddings etc.

They do look very spooky and unusual.

reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 05:38 AM by ArMaP

reply to post by Anonymous ATS

Do you live near an airport?

Those things look suspiciously like aeroplanes...

reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 09:57 AM by sherpa

reply to post by Anonymous ATS

Well if you are filming these in Brighton then you are only 30 minutes away from Gatwick by road, which is a very busy International Airport.

You are also not far from Shoreham much less busy and smaller aircraft.

On balance I would agree with ArMap that they do indeed look like domestic aircraft probably on approach with landing lights on and at lower altitude, the flashing lights are the navigation strobes.

Thanks for sharing though.

reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 10:29 AM by mikesingh

Originally posted by sherpa
reply to post by Anonymous ATS

These craft have the capacity to cirlce the earth in approximately 45 minutes. They run on a combination of a cold electric motor powering the anti-gravity engine. both these human inventions were invented in the 1960's and were quickly removed from public domain.

If they were in the public domain then there should be some reference somewhere perhaps you could provide a link.

Hi sherpa! Check it out in the thread here...

The Top Secret US Military Space Program. Is The Future Already Here?

And...

The Aurora is a moderate-sized spacefaring vehicle. The late National Security Council scientist Dr. Michael Wolf (4.) of NSC's unacknowledged Special Studies Group subcommittee, (formerly called MJ-12), has stated that the Aurora can operate on both conventional fuel and antigravity field propulsion systems. He further stated that the Aurora can travel to the Moon.

The Lockheed-Martin X-33A military spaceplane is a prototype of Lockheed's other spaceplane, the single-stage-to-orbit reuseable aerospace vehicle, the National SpacePlane. It is possible that what I have called the X-33A is the Aurora craft which Dr. Wolf described.

The Nautilus is another space- faring craft, a secret military spacecraft which operates by magnetic pulsing. It operates out of the unacknowledged new headquarters of the U.S. Space Command, deep under a mountain in Utah. It makes twice-a-week trips up to the secret military-intelligence space station, which has been in deep space for the past thirty years, and manned by U.S. and USSR (now CIS) military astronauts.

The TAW-50 is a mach-50 hypersonic, antigravity craft. A defense contractor with whom I have been in communication leaked to me details of this U.S. Advanced TAW-50. Developed during the early 1990s, the capabilities of this war-bird are jaw-dropping. And the technology shows that the Defense Department did not fail to utilize what it learned combing through the wreckage of various UFO crashes. The TAW-50 is capable of going into space, and does.

Cheers!