My glasses pickup subliminal advertising, page 7
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 30 times


reply posted on 5-7-2008 @ 07:38 PM by Parabol
reply to post by Disobey



That sounds like a great idea, not sure if it's feasible but good thinking on your part. Anyone know a way to isolate the channels?



reply posted on 5-7-2008 @ 09:00 PM by beammeup
reply to post by o22a6ar



The first thing that comes to my mind that I haven't seen posted as of yet:unless I've missed it is, Alan Parsons Project IROBOT I can't recall but isn't there some controvercy about Alan Parson? Also as a note I have what is called a lazy eye.I see double when doing close up work such as reading.I was told that one day I would have to wear glasses called prisoms,very thick,heavy coke bottle type glasses.I also have had a very rare condition called central cerrious.I can tell you that "led" lights are very difficult to read and is a sign that an eppisode is/has occured.


reply posted on 5-7-2008 @ 10:22 PM by chris_stibrany
Originally posted by SJE98
reply to
post by chris_stibrany



I take no offense at all chris_stibrany, but who said I was 50 ? Anyway I understand what you’re saying. I know the kind of advertising your speaking of is not Subliminal, but this was very different and was subliminal. I’m still under 50 by a margin and retired from the military not too long ago. I still have sharp mind and can still land a Blackhawk at high speed in crosswinds at night in the rain with the best of them.


ok thats understood ^^ i personally hear a lot of stuff like this all the time and literally like 90 times out of a 100 its because they dont understand the technology. regardless of their age. but thanks for clarifying that i wasnt trying to be a prick. just have a lot of experience helping people with technology.


reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 12:30 AM by SJE98
Well, I tried setting up a camera today with my glasses in front of them . The Sony digital camera seems to work ok. The problem is that trying to get the glasses to stay steady in front of the lens while holding the camera at the same time. I’m trying some techniques that some of you had mentioned.

My first test. Using one of the lenses of my glasses. I’m trying to find out If I need both my glass lenses or just one lens. Now when holding the glass lens in front of the camera and looking at the Sony 2.5 inch screen, it looks just like when I’m wearing the glasses. Somewhat blurry. ( Remember these glasses are for reading.) I like the Idea of the glasses being in front of the camera lens. There is some eye strain for me, but not as much as when I’m wearing them looking though the Sony 2.5 Screen LCD screen. That part of the test seems ok. I noticed there is a line on the center of the screen. I believe that is from the TV and sets the White Point of the TV Screen. Interlaced and non-interlaced I’m not sure which one the TV has. Well the Camera will pick it up with my glasses in front of the lens. Take the glasses away from the lens and no line in the TV Screen. Strange. but easily explained, as this is what sets the Temperature in Kelvin for the White point, I.e. 5000K 8000K 9000K. other high quality cameras might pick this up well without my glasses.

Test -2 Ghosting Naked eye. I see a ghosting effect when wearing my glasses it looks sort of out of whack Red Green and Blue along the image(s) edges being projected on the TV but the main picture is blurry. I looked though one lens on my glasses, some ghosting not much. I looked though the other a little more noticeable ghosting. Then I put then reading glasses back on to compare. The ghosting is much more noticeable.

I beginning to think I need both lenses in front of the camera at the same time. I tried putting in front of the camera again with each lens. It seems to pick it up but not very good. I’m sure it would pick it up better if somehow I could use both lenses at once. I tried snapping a few photos of the screen, but can’t hold the camera very steady and the glasses at the same time. The photos were not coming out straight not to mention the photos looked really bad. I’m going to look for my tripod, I have one just have to find It. I’m not sure how I would rig up my glasses to the tripod, but I might find a way or just hold them for a test. Trying to catch this just might be near impossible. If I need both lenses of the glasses, I’m not sure what I’m going to do. I’ll have to think up something very crude. A DVD recorder might be better, then I can review the shows, but darn that will take a long time.
The prescription is not with the glasses as I thought it was. But what I posted looks like a lens cut. I’m going to have to get that from the optometrist. Seems like there trying to lock me in to just buying glasses from them only since they hold my prescription. But I’ll get it this week since I have to go back anyway for further evaluation. I asked my wife how clear she seen the advertising. She said It was kind of very blurry to her but could make out the letters, but strained her eyes doing it looking through the glasses. Hmm. just had to ask her.

One more thing I had forgot to mention. It might be important, I’m not sure. When wearing these reading glasses The first thing I noticed is that When looking at something at a distance it looks sort like (V ) not quite but sort puts things a little out of perspective. But when I hold a newspaper or magazine close it seems ok. I’m not sure if that has to do with the lens cut, the perception or both.


reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 12:38 AM by SJE98
reply to post by Anonymous ATS



I noticed that to with my reading glasses some images seem to have this 3D effect. but not on the glasses I would normally wear.


reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 12:41 AM by iwant2believe1992
Originally posted by SJE98
Subliminal Advertising On CBS TV Network. “ IROBOT” ?
I know My header title sound like A national enquirer headline , but it’s true.

My glasses pickup subliminal advertising on television that cannot be seen by the naked eye. How weird is that ?

Subliminal Advertising On CBS TV Network. I mean like the 1960’s and 1970”s where the message will flash very fast in a matter of seconds in the background or is very hidden but your vision will not pick it up , but it’s said your subconscious will pick it up pick up the message.

Well, I just received these new reading glasses. It took 4 months to get them. Turns out I needed very special lenses because my sight is not exactly lined up, so the optometrist tells me this very rare. So after a very long 4 months I get the new reading glasses and tried them out tonight, well I’m looking up at the TV while reading. The show on is CSI. It looks very blurry with my new reading glasses on . I just wanted to see how they looked at distance not good. Anyway in big 4” letter across the top of the 26” screen was “ IROBOT” flashing during the show. I thought what the heck is that. My wife say’s what? I tell her” the Big Red Letters on the top of the screen flashing real fast “ IROBOT” My wife told me she could not see it. I told her wait a few minutes it might flash again , sure enough it did . I handed her my glasses and said hurry look, she said what is that? Why is it flashing “ IROBOT” then she moved them off fast and looked at the screen and said “ where did go” Then put then on looked though them again and seen “ IROBOT” In big 4” letters then she said it vanished. Then it started again she said. Big red letters flashing “ KFC” , this was getting a little strange the next show was flashing “Mc Donald’s”

So CBS want me to rent IRobot ( by the way CBS owns Paramount Pictures ) head on over to KFC or Mc Donald’s for Family take out over the 4th of July weekend.

I’m going to see if I can catch some political TV Ads with subliminal advertising and post on the board what I see on the screen I bet that will be a fun topic. This strains my eye’s doing this.

I’ll be on the lookout with my new Anti- Subliminal Signal Advertising Glasses.

CBS is the biggest user and abuser of Subliminal Advertising. Check this out .

“CBS Tries 'Branding' Its Shows”
Tries branding It’s Shows ? They Brand Every show from what I have seen tonight.
query.nytimes.com...
The ''creators'' spots also carry an important subliminal message from the network with the oldest viewership. ''These are not older, cigar-chomping men in rocking chairs writing these shows,'' Mr. Schweitzer said.





[edit on 4-7-2008 by SJE98]




uhhhh you've gotta be kidding! that's amazing! you can expose the shadow government, man! why haven't you been doing what you can to do it?!



reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 12:44 AM by jkrog08
reply to post by iwant2believe1992



Was that statement really called for?I admit I am guilty of smartass,obnoxious statements sometimes,but it is usually in the heat of debate.I just dont get it..........but whatever.


reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 12:46 AM by SJE98
reply to post by DocEmrick



I went to the CBS website and read all the description of the shows . I could not find it . CBS has them listed as episodes, so I read every description of them that was on their site. I.e. the story line. Etc.. what happens in the show. Since this was aired just recently I thought they might have it. My wife said it was a re-run. So I guess I’ll be going to the DVD rental store to see if they rent them in seasons. But that is a very good Idea. I will let you know If I find it.


reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 12:52 AM by DocEmrick
Originally posted by SJE98
reply to
post by DocEmrick



I went to the CBS website and read all the description of the shows . I could not find it . CBS has them listed as episodes, so I read every description of them that was on their site. I.e. the story line. Etc.. what happens in the show. Since this was aired just recently I thought they might have it. My wife said it was a re-run. So I guess I’ll be going to the DVD rental store to see if they rent them in seasons. But that is a very good Idea. I will let you know If I find it.



I'll try and DVR an episode of CSI on CBS next week, then covert it to a format that I can use. I doubt I'll find anything, as one previous post stated it is probably some new form of subliminal that cannot be detected by a frame-by-frame breakdown. Worth a shot though. Thanks for the info SJE.


reply posted on 6-7-2008 @ 01:22 AM by SonicInfinity
reply to post by SJE98



Well then, it is only a matter of time. Since this is really important, I'm sure you'll find out how to make the camera look through two lenses at the same time.

Also, try to find a way to have the camera move a little bit after you've focused on it for a little while. Why? The same reason people don't believe in stationary UFOs. Movement will allow a skeptic to have more data to analyze.

[edit on 7/6/2008 by SonicInfinity]
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 18 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 14 days ago with 122 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 19 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 16 days ago with 85 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 16 days ago with 83 member flags

ATS Live North America is broadcasting in 47 minutes.
Today's Show: ATS Live: 96: Super powers, Falklands Woes, Stan Deyo Interview, Syria, Telepathy, The Devils Chord.