It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mahajohn
"why don't we have the simple flight log for any of the airlines showing the names of the hijackers on a flight list."
I am not going to go searching around the internet (so much unreliable, unsourced information; I'm a librarian) for such information, but my memory of the event is such that names of many of the suspected hijackers were released very soon after the event (that day?), based entirely on the passenger manifests. Those are probably not public records, but believe you me, I'm sure each and every one of those bits of data is recorded and stored in perpetuity.
"Also, we are still waiting for one "clear" photo of a plane hitting the Pentagon. The most secure building in the United States."
Perhaps the Pentagon doesn't want the photos or videos released precisely because this is supposed to be the "most secure building around. I mean, it obviously wasn't, and I don't know how one can claim that. Prior to that day, I'd mistakenly driven on the Pentagon's grounds TWICE without any attention being paid to me. Try doing that at Ft. Meade. Anyway, from the Pentagon's perspective, just showing that video, and showing how vulnerable that building is, might be considered a direct threat to the physical security of the building. You'd best believe nefarious that folks would study the footage for technical insights.
Further, it could be considered quite heinous and offensive to the memory of the folks who lost their lives there that day. The twin towers' (at least one) attack and destruction was filmed on live television, and we all sat there rivited. The Pentagon attack was entirely different. The eyes of the world weren't already on it. The ONLY reason I can think of to release this footage, especially the more graphic stuff, is to satisfy 9/11 Truthers and folks who dig sites like the late, great Ogrish. Virtually no one else cares to see such awful stuff.
Since we're on the subject, can anyone explain to me why this grand conspiracy would have seen it fit to use a cruise missile at the Pentagon, versus a plane filled with people, a la the other attacks?
Tom Burnett says on two separate phone calls "They're talking about crashing this plane" and "They're talking about crashing this plane into the ground." Source: findarticles.com...
This was reported to the FBI by his wife Deena. "Thomas Burnett mentioned during this conversation that the hijackers were talking about flying the plane into the ground, location not specified." Source: intelfiles.egoplex.com...
Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
Atta was found on security tapes weeks later.
However all hijacker photo ids were up on the front page within days.
Truther websites has stated many were US government agents and
DNA From Flight 11 Passengers:
By April 30 2004, 52 of those aboard Flight 11 were identified, 45 by DNA. 26 of those on Flight 175 were identified, 26 by DNA.
-Who They Were: Robert C. Shaler