To all the latecomers:
Thanks for your opinions and interest...I keep reading the incoming posts...and thinking that yeah....I am disappointed this was merely a plane of
some sort because in my untrained eye, I thought it was definitely something more interesting then a plane caught on a 4 second shutter opening!!
Anyone who wants to become better at examining photos on their own on the internet should go back and read the whole thread it's very interesting.
To all the great members that contributed to educating us on why this is some sort of plane:
I loved learning all about why it was a plane, how it matches up to all the great photos everyone submitted that show various types of planes at night
with long shutter exposures....and to all the people in this thread that PATIENTLY, without criticizing or being rude, instructed the rest of us who
wanted at the "truth" of what it was...
I applaud you   You all have been great in this thread, even when a few sarcastic posts came in, you all held your temper and ignored them
and just kept patiently showing us through many great examples and opinions, and helping the rest of us become better at examining photos
|
mysoogal reply
to InterestedObserver , problem with what you say, is i cant see no wings anywhere, you know from this picture its probably possible to get little
view of the wings. i've tried to see any wings and came out empty 
lights seem to be very powerful, yet none of the lights help the wings appear anywhere.
this thing, whatever it is, seems to be a soild object not moving, as i do not see any motion nor blurry things around the objects anywhere.
case closed unknown
|
reply to post by LateApexer313
Well put LateApexer313!
I would just like to add that the contributions from all the posters, with the odd exception that was dealt with nicely by the mods!, should be a
template of how a thread and subsequent posts should be the norm here on ATS.
It is threads and posts like this with invaluable contributions from specialists in the field of graphics, aviation, photography and common sense,
that make it all worth while whilst investigating and denying ignorance.
H
|
reply to post by Anonymous ATS
If you look at the stars they are also elongated...This is only done with a long or timed exposure of a cameras shutter...either it be a digital or
manual SLR...Also if you look at the photo that I posted of the plane that I took a picture of its wings are also not present..Its to dark to see the
wings for one....
|
The shape of this object looks sort of like a strand of DNA. Jose Esacmilla has videos of objects like this and calls them critters. Good work!!
|
seems to be another incarnation of the popular "rods" phenom
simply long exposure time with some common natural light effects showing the movement of some kind of winged insect
you can see the path of the wings
|
THis is pretty cool picture, possible ball lighting.
Umm story short is that I was on the phone talking to a guy helping him correct a POS issue and he had stated they have been having rather strong
thunderstorms and got a picture of lighting that looked like a ball then exploded inward in a show of sparks....
I was kinda wondering if he was BS'n and sure enough he emailed me the picture.
Check it out.
Could be a bird that struck... hell I really don't know but check it out
|
|
BTW i figured you guys would get a kick out of this it might be the same pic or not idk but it kinda proves the whole plane theroy.
|
thye OPs picture from mufon is fake, the camera was rotated slightly, and also the picture is posted rotated 180 degrees from when it w as shot, also
if u zoom in to the bottom of the picture , u can tell it should be the top, becvause whoever posted it "claiming" its real, used the wrong shade of
black to attempt to black out the lights, streaked lights.,(i can spot this all out and crop it n stuff if u guys wish)
its rather clever though how it was done. u can do alot to make something look like what it isnt. if u know your computer software, and take ur time,
with the photo, this guy took his time, but its spottable, so he must of havent taken the "right" amount of time,.
[edit on 8-7-2008 by noone81]
|
reply to post by LateApexer313
I know that your picture highlights the multi-colored image in upper right.
I did notice a < or wedge that is pointed to the left about a third of the way to the left side of photo.
It looks very light but it does stand out and has no lights?
Best Wishes
|
