Photo of Object Posted on Mufon I Want Everyone's Opinion , page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 53 times
Topic started on 1-7-2008 @ 08:49 PM by LateApexer313


reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 09:29 PM by schrodingers dog
reply to post by LateApexer313



How would the eclipse affect the image?
I think it's not the right shape for the space station.
Cool pic.
Also, thank you for not letting us wait 10hrs for it.

[edit on 7/1/2008 by schrodingers dog]


reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 09:36 PM by Havalon
reply to post by LateApexer313



Hi LA!
Great find, s&f!
I upped the contrast and brightness a little, although it would be good to get Internos to have a quick look and see what he can do the image!



Sure does look like there is something there, other than star movement!

H


reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 09:39 PM by LateApexer313
reply to post by Havalon



Oh wow cool, thanks for enhancing the image for us Havalon Yes, certainly looks like the lights are attached to something solid, star for you, and thanks!

Yes it doesn't look like star movement since there's a few streaks that look like stars in the background. Does that mean this object was stationary since it isn't blurred? Anyone?

I sent Internos a U2U so hopefully he will have time to look at it sometime soon

Notice too, how the lights are all in pairs, except for the red ones? all I can say is wow lol...

[edit on 1-7-2008 by LateApexer313]



reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 09:46 PM by Havalon
reply to post by LateApexer313



Yeah and thanks LA!
I thought that too!, the *pairs* of lights does seem to have an 'intelligence' about it rather than 'random' starlight.

H


reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 09:49 PM by LateApexer313
reply to post by Rhain



Hiyah Rhain,

I was thinking that it could be that too, thanks for putting up an example for us...the only difference is, the lights on the object in question don't blur together like they are moving...like your example.

The lights on the object in the MUFON picture are perfectly clear, not blurry at all like the stars in the picture with it, in fact when you do the magnifying tool there's a star that's blurred up above the object to the right...so...that's why I was wondering, does that mean the object wasn't moving?

[edit on 1-7-2008 by LateApexer313]


reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 09:52 PM by gauncents
reply to post by Havalon



Notice how the resemblence of the Mexico sighting of 2004 has kind of the same light signature





reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 09:59 PM by angelc01
reply to post by LateApexer313

Hello LateApexer313 Very interesting image the lights seem to hold symetry when doing a closeup.
this is a related subject img
[img]

it seems lunar eclipse have some attraction to UFOS
star and flag




[edit on 1-7-2008 by angelc01]


reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 10:03 PM by Rhain
Originally posted by LateApexer313
reply to
post by Rhain



Hiyah Rhain,

I was thinking that it could be that too, thanks for putting up an example for us...the only difference is, the lights on the object in question don't blur together like they are moving...like your example.

[edit on 1-7-2008 by LateApexer313]


Yes so true and I do believe it may be due to the camera used the four second exposure.

On the pic it say 4.0s I take that to mean 4 seconds and if you count off the lights its repeated 4 times.

On a SLR camera the shutter stays open for the full 4 seconds which draws the light as a blur. But on a digital camera the shutter does not stay open. Again I am no expert but to my way of thinking.

Nice camera btw.




reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 10:13 PM by LateApexer313
reply to post by the seeker_713g



Hiyah seeker, and thanks...I would contact the poster but when they show the reports on MUFON they don't give the person's e-mail address or any way to contact them....I don't even know if MUFON has a way to contact them...anyone know about that?

But I am close to buying Rhain's and roadgravel's view that it's a plane going by.

Do plane's have two sets of white lights, one on top and one on the bottom? And how about the speed? Would a plane travel that far or that slow in 4 seconds? Or, I should say, is it going fast or slow for a plane?

[edit on 1-7-2008 by LateApexer313]

[edit on 1-7-2008 by LateApexer313]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 8 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 16 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 11 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 2 days ago with 27 member flags

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 15 hours ago, 25 flags
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 17 hours ago, 25 flags
My Brain = about to explode
  Member Art, Posted 7 hours ago, 22 flags
ATS's Gutter-rats and the 90+ intro thread
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 20 flags
Amazing French Indigo Girl in Africa (Tippi)
  Survival, Posted 6 hours ago, 14 flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 17 hours ago, 128 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 15 hours ago, 101 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 11 hours ago, 65 replies