posted on Jan, 20 2003 @ 08:58 PM
With the metaphor and symbol part, how come in a part that is unbelieveable or stupid it is a symbol or metaphor? Well, I find son of god
unbelieveable, so why isn't that part a metaphor or symbol like the the other 99% of the bible?
I have asked about Noahs flood, I get "that was a metaphor of god coming and cleansing the Earth of evil" Or other sh*t.
Also, with the giants, "They are symbols of a race of great people, giant like in their achievments." Now, why are they symbols? Why aren't they
what they are called? Or why if they are metaphors and symbols, why aren't son of god and virgin birth and water into wine metaphors and symbols?
They all about as believable as the other, and they are all sh*t.
Also, when it something, like infantcide, it means something else,(happy shall he be, taketh thy little ones and daseth against the stone) but when
it's good, that's what it means? Why isn't it what it says and nothing more? If that is what is said, then why isn't it so?