Video of UFO over Panama City, page 2

reply to post by VsantosGonzalez

---

Hola Victor, gracias por tomarte el tiempo de responder preguntas. Tu filmación es muy buena y espero que esta no sea la ultima.

(Hello Victor thanks for taking the time to respond to questions. Your footage was great and I hope this is not the first of your sightings.)

Hablo español perfectamente y cualquier duda que tengas por favor hazmela saber, hay gente aca en ATS que piensa que lo que viste son luces de esas grandes que se utilizan en grandes eventos de casinos o lanzamientos de pelìculas, como estas:

(I speak spanish fluently, and any doubt that you might have, please let me know, there are people here in ATS that think that what you saw were searchlights, like the ones used in big casino events or movie premieres)






Cual es tu opinión Victor, será que si son luces como estas?

(What do you think Victor, are they indeed searchlights?)

Un abrazo.

(Regards)

Camilo



[edit on 30-6-2008 by Camilo1]

[edit on 30-6-2008 by Camilo1]

reply to post by VsantosGonzalez

---

Victor--

Thanks for the response.

I think that the raw video would be a great starting point--there are a lot of smart folks on ATS who will be able to review.

If you could post the video from your camera as is, that would be awesome. Although you cannot directly upload it to ATS, there are lots of free file sharing sites that you can upload it to and post the link.

RapidShare is one that comes to mind, although any will work as long as it supports larger file sizes.

We all look forward to the video and hopefully getting to the bottom of this!

delius

Originally posted by delius
reply to post by VsantosGonzalez

---

Victor--

Thanks for the response.

I think that the raw video would be a great starting point--there are a lot of smart folks on ATS who will be able to review.

If you could post the video from your camera as is, that would be awesome. Although you cannot directly upload it to ATS, there are lots of free file sharing sites that you can upload it to and post the link.

RapidShare is one that comes to mind, although any will work as long as it supports larger file sizes.

We all look forward to the video and hopefully getting to the bottom of this!

delius

Hola Victor te traduzco el mensaje de Delius:

Victor

Gracias por tu respuesta

Creo que el video original puede ser un punto de partida, hay mucha gente inteligente en ATS que podría revisarlo.

Si puedes subir el video de tu cámara como está sería muy bueno, no lo puedes subir directamente a este sitio, ATS, hay muchos sitios en internet donde puedes compartir archivos, y darnos el enlace.

RapidShare es uno de los que se me ocurre, sin embargo cualquiera funcionará si es que puede recibir archivos de gran tamaño.

Esperamos ver el video y llegar al fondo de este asunto.

Good Day All,

Originally posted by Camilo1
Found a good one I think (as always it could be cgi)

YouTube Link

It was uploaded to Youtube a couple of days ago, by VSantosGonzalez, he says the video was taken by him on his apartment at 6:35 pm.

There is a link to a blog also created a couple of days ago.

ovnispanama.blogspot.com...

In the blog VSantosGonzalez says that his name is Victor, and that he did not believe in UFOs until he saw these lights from his balcony as he arrived from work, he grabbed a camera and the Youtube video is the result.

What say you?

[edit on 29-6-2008 by Camilo1]

[edit on 30-6-2008 by Camilo1]

My first impression is that it appears that Victor was not focused on the objects; it "feels like" a panoramic shot of the city; moreover, assuming he "saw" the objects, one would think that as they moved upwards out of the frame he would have followed them and or panned the sky for them . . . smells a little fishy to me . . . hints of "Vue" software . . .

Cheers,
Frank

reply to post by Frank Warren

---

Additionally on his blog writes, "but when returning from work by the balcony . . . in the distance I saw 5 lights, with some strange movements"; thus he indicates that he saw the objects "first"; with that in mind one would think that he would have been "hastily trying to focus on the objects" during the duration and followed their path as they left (which didn't happen) . . . this is a "red flag" IMHO.

Cheers,
Frank

reply to post by Frank Warren

---

Hey guys sorry for not logging in, all the searchlights shown have beams that are visible from the source, these do not. However, if you look directly underneath them you can see a gap in the buildings where a strong light source is coming from. Maybe this is the searchlights, im not an expert, only an observation. Does look cool though, happy searching.

Peace

reply to post by Camilo1

---

It's just a gut feeling but, for some reason it feels fake. I can't quite put my finger on this yet, but being in the profession I am in, something tells me this is not quite genuine.

One thing off the bat that seems a bit off for me is the typical "SHAKY/DRAMA" Style camera movement. It's something that has been a style adapted by just quite a few TV shows.

If you want to put some CGI into a shot, then first you need to 'ACT' out the scene and make it 'feel' like you're seeing something you're not. Kind of like acting out in front of a green screen if you take my meaning.

There isn't much to this shot, the simplicity allows this to have a certain amount of believable angles to it, but I still think it's not quite enough to make me convinced that this is the real deal.

For the people I work with, one thing that would make us ALL very happy is the footage taken with a decent glass (Lens) and 1080p HD Camera which we can now buy pretty cheap these days. Also, the other thing is, that while HD cameras are now very easy to use as the standard print for CGI shots, it's also the best thing to give you all the relevant errors that comes up if the shot is tampered with.

So, a FULL RAW UNEDITED shot, with all it's metadata and info intact, next to an analyzed shot of it from a credited firm that would tell us if it's real or not. If we could get that, then we're in business. And even then, we should ALL be open for the obvious hoaxes that will be out there.

It's great to believe, it makes us go further into the investigations of such UFO claims, but we should never stamp anything as 100% proof of authenticity unless we've taken the shots our selves and had witnesses who are not your friends.

I'm sorry but when we are dealing with such amazing phenomenons, we need the best possible proof and evidence out there.

Even HD materials now are subject to scrutiny. But at least we can zoom into the photo better than with a shaky SD film.

reply to post by Camilo1

---

looks real to me...


thanks for sharing

reply to post by Element-115

---

Hi Element-115

My knowledge about photography pretty much amounts to nothing, and you seem to know a lot about the subject, in this case we are lucky to have the man from Panama here at the board, if you want you can ask him a questions and I`ll be glad to translate.

Thanks for your post

Camilo1

Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 10 days ago with 65 member flags

Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 18 days ago with 60 member flags

UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 13 days ago with 31 member flags

The Edge of Reality - Updated Report on the Illinois Police UFO case, January 5th, 2000.
  Posted 6 days ago with 28 member flags

The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 4 days ago with 27 member flags

Jacques Vallee: Implications of UFO Phenomena - Thinking Allowed.
  Posted 2 days ago with 22 member flags

1/28/2012 craft in sky From Puerto Rico - Need help getting more info!!
  Posted 8 days ago with 21 member flags

UFO above Wadden Sea
  Posted 12 days ago with 14 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: