It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You are guilty of lible and slander of Americans fighting in Iraq.
Originally posted by Grafilthy
reply to post by sos37
The OP should be BANNED by the moderators for posting hate-filled topics without evidence, and using such a sensationalist and unfounded subject line.
For someone who is so "patriotic" you are having a tough time understanding the first amendment. So in the spirit of denying your ignorance....
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Hope this helps.
You don't wanna sound un-American do you?
Hey genius, last time I looked Congress didn't control this website. The first amendment says Congress won't make any law abridging that right. As soon as Congress joins the ATS moderator staff then you might have a point. Your first amendment rights are precluded by the TOS on websites like this one, Einstein.
Originally posted by Grafilthy
reply to post by sos37
Hey genius, last time I looked Congress didn't control this website. The first amendment says Congress won't make any law abridging that right. As soon as Congress joins the ATS moderator staff then you might have a point. Your first amendment rights are precluded by the TOS on websites like this one, Einstein.
I have a better idea.
Why don't we make you a mod.....that way any time you want to wave your flag at someones post you misunderstand you can ban them!
Or you can move to China!!
It's already like that there.
Einstein.
Originally posted by OhZone
This is the sorry thing about war. The purpose of war is to kill people and break things.
These guys are trained to kill, and so that is what they do. Everyone not them is the enemy, so kill it.
I cannot condemn them for this. Add to their training, the psychoactive drugs that they are given. They are not the same men who got on the transport ships, and many of them are not the same when they come back. Many of them will never be the same.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
Of course you didn't see any US troops.
Don't you see the scheme.
Poster A posts a video from an enemy website that claims that the poor victims were killed by the evil, drugged, US soldiers.
Then, without any scrutiny whatsoever, Posters B, C, D, E... chime in with their armchair psychology and personal anecdotes that have no connection to the event in question, but are meant to affirm without question that indeed American service members are poor, confused fools who kill indiscriminately and agonize over it all later among themselves and a few close friends.
It's a shame to see our website used in such a shameless manner.
Originally posted by palg1
I know a little something about the effects of small and large caliber damage to vehicles. The damage observed on the video appears to be consistant with small arms fire from close range and from different angles.
Note that there is very little weapons damage on the hoods, tops and trunks themselves. The shots were all fired into the side of the vehicle and through the front and rear wind shields.
I find it very odd that there is so little damage to the top portions of both vehicles considering that they were fired on from the air. Even a stabalised gun has a large drop pattern. Weapons damage would be apparent in these areas. The OP states that the vehicles were immobalised from the air. It also doesn't appear that there is any heavy caliber damage to the cars.
I can't see it. There is something missing here.
Answer me this.
1. What kind of helicopter fired on the vehicles?
2. What type of weapons were used to immobalise the cars?
"Add to their training, the psychoactive drugs that they are given. They are not the same men who got on the transport ships, and many of them are not the same when they come back. Many of them will never be the same."
Originally posted by palg1
The damage observed on the video appears to be consistant with small arms fire from close range and from different angles.
Note that there is very little weapons damage on the hoods, tops and trunks themselves. The shots were all fired into the side of the vehicle and through the front and rear wind shields.
I find it very odd that there is so little damage to the top portions of both vehicles considering that they were fired on from the air. Even a stabalised gun has a large drop pattern. Weapons damage would be apparent in these areas. The OP states that the vehicles were immobalised from the air. It also doesn't appear that there is any heavy caliber damage to the cars.
I can't see it. There is something missing here.