It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Controlled Demolition VS 9-11 demolition

page: 1

log in


posted on Jun, 29 2008 @ 01:27 PM
Please, check out this demolition of a "HALF" constructed building, the building barely gets taken down, listen to all the explosives going off on this baby....

Now tell me, how the hell a plane flies into a building 20 times the size as this small little building gets taken down by one plane ???

It's absurd!!!

9-11 was planned to the teeth to go down!!!

posted on Jun, 29 2008 @ 02:04 PM
No, c'mon now people....wheres all those 9-11 de-bunkers now ?

I want you to tell me how such a small building can't go down with a CONTROLLED demolition and still manages to sustain it's infrastructure,,,, but a building 20 times the size of this building goes down with ONE hit of a plane 100 times smaller than the building...???!!!!

C'mon now!

posted on Jun, 29 2008 @ 02:47 PM
9/11 was an unregulated demolition, with no regard to public safety.
So they had freedom to use whatever necessary, to do the job.

posted on Jun, 29 2008 @ 03:05 PM
you don`t even need to get into the technical data
to know that there is NO WAY that ALL THREE BUILDINGS
came down like that without being a controlled demolition..

NO WAY..the odds are insane...

posted on Jun, 29 2008 @ 03:18 PM
reply to post by Maya432

WELLLLL, thats my point...i am SUPER drunk right now, and real damn agitated, HOW CAN PEOPLE still believe the 9_11 was not planed ????

top topics

log in