T&C interpretation question

I want to say, first and foremost, im not looking for a "loophole" here.

I dont want to post something thats gona anger the mods/owners, so ill be very blunt in my question

i've been noticing a certain grouping of people that have, for lack of a better word, been lying to get their point across. (nothing to do with the political forum)

IE: These certain people have been posting one thing in one thread in forum A

and something completely different, and contradictory, in another thread in forum B
as if some of us dont subscribe to the same threads.

my intentions is to use these types of posts as an argument to why conspiracies can carry a very negative stigma in society.

My confusion with the ATS T&C is that it says attack the topic, not the poster, but my interpretation says that sometimes the poster becomes the topic

anyways, i am asking this with completel sincerity. I'd be happy to answer any questions since i dont think i did a very good job of posting my question (hey...its like 2 am)

[edit on 29-6-2008 by Andrew E. Wiggin]