Proof That the Advertising Industry is a Form of Mind Control? , page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times
Topic started on 28-6-2008 @ 09:02 PM by MemoryShock
Mind Control is an ambiguous phrase. An objective person will understand that there is little credence to the idea that a general formula could be used to 'control' the thought process and subsequent behaviours of people with various personality inclinations, interests, economic(and some would argue social along with economic) standing, political affiliations and various other different attentions that define the complexity of human behaviour.

But what of the Advertising Industry?

They collectively control the, through a cumulative aggregation of 'ten-fifteen second' interactions that we as a population interact with on a daily basis.

The comedic punchline to a cell phone commercial. The use of celebrity to hawk a shoe line. The institution of fear when imploring civic duty (Piracy is a favorite and current example). The catchy jingle that sifts back into our consciousness a day or two after we have heard it.

Advertising is proof that someone is getting paid to make an attempt at insuring a likely behaviour in response to an interaction with a third party source (print, visual, audio, digital media).

A conspiracy site like ATS needs to start at the fundamentals. And that means taking a look at the various day to day interactions(human and 'inanamite' alike) and reverse engineering the cause for those expressions and the reasoning for the decision to make, for instance, red the most used color in road side signage.

We as a website, concerned with conspiracy, should be well focused on what the advertising industry is doing.


Sequent, BSU Launch Media Behavior Institute

by Joe Mandese, Thursday, Jun 26, 2008 8:32 AM ET

In what may be an industry first, a leading research and consulting group has teamed up with a renowned American university to launch a new privately-held media research company that will utilize state-of-the-art methods to track consumer media behavior. *Snip*

During his presentation, Bloxham said the institute's goal was a pragmatic understand of how people use media and how it affects their behavior, and that it would employ and embrace a wide variety of methodologies to do that in a way that would "scale" and be cost efficient for the industry.

MediaPost

Bloxham is talking to industry professionals in this regard. Not the population.

In fact, if we were to actually take a concerted interest in what they are discussing these days, the impact of their subtle manipulations would become diluted and potentially ineffective.

This thread is designed to hash out our day to day conscious encounters with established presentations that effect our mood and potentially our behaviour.

'Google' Advertising research, or Madison Avenue Presentations.

I guarantee that you will find many examples of people who are getting paid to 'remotely' influence our thoughts and our behaviour.

As well, I would like to discuss our reactions to this imposition of a 'fifteen second' society and what we can do, for ourselves, to remind ourselves to focus on what is important to our respective lives...as opposed to their bottom line.

If they are scheduling presentations Ad Nauseam regarding how we will react, I think that we should have our own pro longed presentation regarding how we want to react and how we can objectively react to their attempts at subtle manipulation.

Let's talk about them and decide that purified water is preferable to a freaking soft drink...or something along those lines...


reply posted on 28-6-2008 @ 09:37 PM by Anti-Tyrant
reply to post by MemoryShock



It's very likely that the more established companies will have worked their greasy hands into the advertising agencies, so i can't dismiss the possibility that they have been subverted.

Although of course, it's this kind of thinking that makes one worry just how far-reaching the implications go.

Sometimes i can't help but wonder, if all of a sudden 'they' stopped doing all this, if they suddenly decided to up and leave us to our own devices, what then?

Will we move on, create a new world where such things cannot possibly happen?

It seems more likely we'd collapse in on ourselves, unable to function without the guiding hand of the puppeteers.

At least, that'd be where conventional wisdom leads me...


reply posted on 28-6-2008 @ 09:59 PM by MemoryShock
Originally posted by Anti-Tyrant
Although of course, it's this kind of thinking that makes one worry just how far-reaching the implications go.


That is a wonderful question.

I like to see it as an analogy to military hierarchy. People do what their superiors are told.

I am not certain the vetting process to becoming an advertising employee/exec, but I sincerely doubt that there is any 'subversion' in the process.

They see it as a business, I would think. The bottom line. An analysis of what has worked in the past with regards to an ongoing analysis of the burgeoning technologies (internet, Tivo with regards to the 'fast forwarding through commercials).

It's a depersonalization of the individual in that if their 'formula' works to increase the business done by the client, then a business win-win situation has occurred.

And I think the key term is "depersonalization".

These days, a concerted effort to focus oneself with the success of our fellow human is in actuality only a ploy to better gain the interest of the unaware. Which is unfortunate.

We now have to consider the fact that morality is merely a side bar and pacification at that.

Boggles my mind, to see and experience what people have and can do but still have the gumption to spout, "I'm for you, man."

It's ludicrous. And used in all aspects of our media. Public Relations is a joke because the very people who are telling our leaders how to present themselves are the very people versed in how to manipulate a perspective.

And it is all not a tandem effort to explicitly control our thought processes...rather, it is a collective effort to "save face".

People wonder why we have difficulties in communication...it's because there are people actively subverting communication and attempting to garner cooperation without rational discourse.

And the scary part is, as you stated, they are doing it in the name of corporate interest. It is likely that in many cases, they do not know what "rational discourse" means...or are unwillingly to utilize the strategy as 'non-cost effective'.


reply posted on 28-6-2008 @ 10:01 PM by Ian McLean
Originally posted by MemoryShock
reverse engineering the cause for those expressions and the reasoning for the decision to make, for instance, red the most used color in road side signage.


Great topic. Attended an in-house industry seminar once about the use of color connotation in a worldwide market. Very interesting stuff, such as why brides don't wear white in certain parts of Asia, why you should be careful using the color orange in various parts of the UK, etc. As always,
Wikipedia has some interesting comments.

Should be careful about distinguishing motive. For example, I notice you emphasize proof -- a hot-button here at ATS, and advocate considering certain issues, possibly leading to behavioral change. Is that not a form of 'advertising'?

Good point by Anti-Tyrant. Perhaps the real force behind this is a consumerist society, that places all that can be made desirable at the same moral level.



reply posted on 29-6-2008 @ 11:54 AM by MemoryShock
Originally posted by Shar_Chi
Do you have a particular axe to grind with ads or just want to vent about them?


Actually, despite my disdain for many forms of advertisement, this thread was meant to point out that mind influence(control) is occurring everyday right underneath our noses. For being a conspiracy website, we still get caught up in looking for the exciting story and smoking gun conspiracies that prove we have been lied to and exposes the bad guys.

But on a more fundamental level, we can see that every day there are many forms third-party, non-interactive communications that are designed to excite the individual and associating that excitement with a specific product...in the hopes that the association will be enough to get the individual to spend money on said associated product.

That is evidence, very strong evidence, of "Mind Control".

Originally posted by Shar_Chi
If you own a product, how are you supposed to sell it without giving people information? Taking it a step further, a smart salesman knows to appeal to various aspects of the human condition according to the circumstances required, so they use applied psychology to increase sales.


At t[he expense of objective reasoning. How many times does a person buy something that they do not need. Further, How many times does someone buy something that they didn't know that they needed/wanted until they saw it ...amidst a catchy jingle and bright, vivid imagery.

I would venture to state that the person is more attracted to the catchy song and the demonstrated happiness of the humans depicted in said imagery than the actual product itself.

That's my point.

Originally posted by Shar_Chi
But while the money is still in your pocket, YOU are still in control.


To an extent I would agree, but in many cases, I think that you may find people who aren't in control of their cognitive awareness, have no objectivity or wherewithal to make valid and constructive consumer decisions.

Kind of like buying Tylenol Extra Strength because the poor sap didn't realize that the Store Brand that cost seven dollars cheaper but is in very boring packaging contains the exact same ingredients. The only difference that seven dollars accounts for is the advertising costs of the product!

I think that the pervasiveness of advertising is at such a point that it is becoming an omnipresent point of awareness and replaces the capacity for critical thinking...even in such mundane circumstances such as deciding what to eat for lunch.

It's as if many of these marketing professionals don't give a rats anything as to the economic viability of the consumer. Just their company. In fact, it is exactly like that...

[edit on 29-6-2008 by MemoryShock]


reply posted on 29-6-2008 @ 01:39 PM by TechnoFan21
Originally posted by Anti-Tyrant

Two days ago i spent about 40 minutes waiting to watch the new indiana jones film, and that time was taken up by having big-screen advertisements forced down my throat in a manner i found truly disturbing.



I really hate those ads (although I do enjoy watching the good ones because, well, I'm a big fan of culture, and I love movies), because once I get to the end of the ad reel, I have almost forgotten what movie that I was going to watch!

Right at the end of the ads I just kinda space off and think..."Oh, the ads are over. What was I watching again? Oh yeah, that one movie." I usually don't act like that, but the ads at movie theatres are truly meant for you to just zone out and let the ads wash over you.

Originally posted by Ambient Sound
In a very basic sense, in our twisted society, it's really about how much of someone else's energy (work, thought, wealth) you can control, by whatever means (political, philosophical, economic) you can.


And that's exactly what they want. I have figured out exactly what the unfriendly aliens want to do. Some of you may know about the alien's involvement in the Illuminati, and you wonder, "What do they want with taking over humans?". You may come to a solution, like that they just want us to do slave labor, or they want us to control us, but I have discovered that what they want from us as a race is our ability to do anything and everything. If you know about The Secret, you will know what I am talking about(if you don't, I suggest asking around on ATS about it, and I am sure someone will be happy to tell.). I know for a fact, that the Reptillians cannot process emotion. This is because they do not have the 4th or 5th charkras (if you want to know where I am getting my answers from, don't ask. I am doing this research on a Reptillian that lives within close proximity of my neighborhood, and I have had many mental battles with this Reptillian, also by the many accounts of Reptillians feeding off of human emotion). I have also figured out that in order to use The Secret, you would have to have all chakras in order to use it. So in conclusion, the Reptillians and other unfriendly races have taken it up against us to feed off of our emotion, and power so that they could have it for themselves. It would take a lot of people to feed off of emotions and power for a Reptillian to feel like a human (which is indefinitely what they want) they will finally achieve this by NWO, but for right now they are fending off their hunger with ads.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Only read this if you are quite young?
  Posted 9 days ago with 71 member flags
The World Is Waiting On You To Liberate Yourself From Ego!
  Posted 5 days ago with 36 member flags
Crazy Sufi Wisdom: The Moon Is More Valuable Than The Sun
  Posted 8 days ago with 25 member flags
The Messages of Animals
  Posted 19 days ago with 24 member flags
PEACE To attempt the impossible...
  Posted 4 days ago with 23 member flags
Something I Learned from Looking at my dog in the eye.
  Posted 16 days ago with 17 member flags
Experiment: What would YOU do?
  Posted 15 days ago with 12 member flags
A cry for help....anyone out there?
  Posted 16 days ago with 11 member flags