It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by spacevisitor
1. What could be the reason that if it really is some sort of Plasma based life forms, that NASA or the military didn’t used that as a very clever and “logical” explanation for most of the Ufo phenomenon and I mean by Ufo’s Extraterrestrial crafts.
2. And I suppose that the presence of such creatures in the upper levels but also in the lower ** levels of our atmosphere because of there enormous size on some [Couple miles in diameter] they must be a real dangerous threat for all launches and such as the Apollo’s back then and the Shuttle flights these days into space and don’t forget all those flying air planes.
3. Is there any information about collisions with airplanes or visuals from out them by passengers because they are sometimes visible with the human eye?***
4. And if it are some sort of living creatures I assume that they don’t live forever, so they die, how come that they are never found here as far as I know, or do you know of any information about that?
5. And they must be very special because how could these creatures of “flesh and blood?? and Plasma” so to speak survive then in such an extremely hostile environment as space, such as the great difference in temperature because of being in the sun and out the sun, the radiation, the bombardment of small meteors and other small particles and such?
THE CASE FOR THE CRITTERS.
Constable carried out a certain exercise, which aimed at joining energy on one spot the orgone and thereby UFO’s to attract. After a couple Constable an enormous entity in the atmosphere perceived minutes above him, which he could however only feel.
Originally posted by ArMaP
I am still awaiting confirmation that it was the old tether, but even if it was, the satellite was not the most important part of the mission, the satellite was there just because of the tether, it was the same experiment.
Originally posted by zorgon
I don't blame you for doubting critters... I haven't fully figured them out either... but comparing behavior it seems more logical to me... hundreds of Alien vessels seen year after year just flitting around in space and the atmosphere for no purpose is not logical.
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by spacevisitor
2. And I suppose that the presence of such creatures in the upper levels but also in the lower ** levels of our atmosphere because of there enormous size on some [Couple miles in diameter] they must be a real dangerous threat for all launches and such as the Apollo’s back then and the Shuttle flights these days into space and don’t forget all those flying air planes.
I do not think they are a hazard to navigation... they seem to have great control and spend a lot of time teasing our pilots... right from World War II when they soo the glowing balls of lights they called Foo Fighters.
Never once where they a treat... just confused the heck out of people... never once did one hit an airplane... and we never could catch up to them.
Originally posted by zorgon
But I have two theories I am working on...
1) The sudden interest in 'Aliens' about our Nuclear testing and keeping Nukes out of space...
It is highly likely that an atomic blast would yield a strong enough EMP pulse to kill them or seriously harm them
Originally posted by zorgon
2) That these critters are a very old species and are in fact the Watchers.. I have little on that yet but its something I found in some obscure places... and it may be possible that they have 'attendants'
Originally posted by spacevisitor
Don’t forget that Clifford Stone mentioned at the National Press Club Conference in Washington, DC on Wednesday, May 9, 2001 from the diclosure project that back then the military already knew of 57 different Alien species, and perhaps even more.
Originally posted by zorgon
but do you really thing it likely that a hundred or so would just buzz around the tether, which to them would be old stuff?
Originally posted by zorgon
I don't doubt we have visitors... I know of some that wear military uniforms... but the ones in THIS thread are critters
Originally posted by zorgon
As to Clifford Stone I hear rumors that he is holding out on the good stuff with those FOIA papers
HA! See" say the magic word and the banner appears below... talk about crass commercialism
If those are ice particles then they do not go behind the tether, and to me they do not look like they go behind the tether, regardless of what they may be.
Originally posted by secretnasaman
"the UFO..err Ice Particles don't go behind the tether theory!.
If the "ice" is not behind the tether there is no need for trying to explain how they went unmeltable for 4 days, they were just ice particles near the shuttle, that is the whole idea of the ice particles.
to their fuzzification explanation, of the "camera" that shows the UFO ice cubes, invincible and unmeltable 4 days into the "Event"!
Then could you point us to the specifications of that camera? I tried to find it some time ago and did not found anything useful.
No matter how right all the "skeptical trolls" believe their little talk is, it is based on zero knowledge of the "TOP", CCD, super low light "phenomena" B & White camera!!!
Then why don't you make all that data available? Post it somewhere for us to see. If you have videos that prove that you are right you are worse than the debunkers, you are withholding the truth to yourself and the accuse other people of not knowing about it.
If a bunch of paid, TV "hunters" wanted to really solve this they would have sought out my hrs of TOP video and myself, because I have ALL the info the History channel needs to do REAL research! Come on ATS..you don't buy those celeb/paid "hunters" tether optical illusion solution, based on fake information!
What was the flaw on the tether?
Its just like the skeptic trolls diss of the weird use of a previously flawed tether to hold on to the 100 million dollar satellite, rather than use the NEW one that was the tether that they trained on??
Originally posted by secretnasaman
A little help p-lease... Martyn Stubbs (tbln.com)
f a bunch of paid, TV "hunters" wanted to really solve this they would have sought out my hrs of TOP video and myself, because I have ALL the info the History channel needs to do REAL research!
NASA says now, the mission was a complete success. "Mission Accomplished" !!!!!!!
Originally posted by spacevisitor
I assume he must have a good reason for that because I trust Clifford Stone all the way.
Originally posted by secretnasaman... I bid everyone else (and you too) farewell- I
can not take the abuse (!) any more..I will be at tbln.com
Originally posted by zorgon
Yes they had problems with it the first attempt... it was in the deployment mechanism...
"The first attempt at the tether experiment ended prematurely when problems arose with the deploying mechanism..."
www-istp.gsfc.nasa.gov...
The Tethered Satellite System Reflight (TSS-1R) builds on what we learned about tether systems during the TSS-1 mission, which was flown in 1992
NASA says now, the mission was a complete success. "Mission Accomplished" !!!!!!!
Was it a success? YES
"Models, accepted by scientists for more than 30 years, are incorrect and must be rewritten. This assessment follows analysis by a joint U.S.-Italian Tethered Satellite investigating team of the information gathered during the mission"
www.msfc.nasa.gov...
This is the last time I will post anything on this following issue... I have made several attempts to get some takes on the OTHER tether...
For those few who did pick up on it email me or U2U me and I will point you to the data. As it is still 'sensitive' and involves the OTHER SPACE PROGRAM I will not be posting the info in the forum with all the links to MILITARY sites... which is generally not a good idea to hotlink to those anyway
But there was another tether in the sky... it was there just after STS 75 returned home... and it was up there for a long time... Tracking this thing down has lead me down a path that quite frankly frightens me... the sheer scope of this and the implications...
It has opened many doors I don't like what I see... like the HUNDREDS of laser 'cannons' NASA has around the world disguised as 'astronomical research' including some in RUSSIA..
This other tether... they fired lasers at it from two of these... that are on military sites... No they are not attempting to shoot it down, though they can do that easily... (and so can the Russians) they were testing the power transmission feature.
No I am not going to back that up with data right now...
Here is one picture of the tether taken from a ground station at Kirtland AFB... I picked this one as it also has a 'visitor' in it You will note that t is day 137. It is not attached to the shuttle... it doesn't need to be....
Originally posted by Blueracer
So? I don't think that all the hype over the video was because of the tether.