Originally posted by secretnasaman
A little help p-lease... Martyn Stubbs (tbln.com)
Okay here goes....
First your post was tough to read... I had to pull it out and separate it...
But here is the way I see it...
You claim to be Martyn Stubbs... the person who had the satellite earth station and recorded HOURS of video... Now I have no proof yet that you are...
but I will take your word for it.
You say...
f a bunch of paid, TV "hunters" wanted to really solve this they would have sought out my hrs of TOP video and myself, because I have ALL the
info the History channel needs to do REAL research!
Yet we have seen very little other than the few minutes on Youtube.. in ALL these years...
So why is that? The only reason I can see is MONEY... you want someone to pay you to release it. But as time goes on... less and less people care...
You want money for them? I have a way that can be done... but you will have to write me at standauffish@earthlink.net... as I won't have time to post
here the next three months...
Point is you say you have footage... but are not releasing even 10 minutes of new stuff... This whole issue went through the court system in an
ownership battle in which NASA says it was public domain material that you intercepted.
Yet you are still sitting on it... are there agreements that were not honored? Are there agreements that are binding? We have nothing... and though I
agree 100% with your assessment... we have nothing that will convince them.
This topic is important to me and my research. Quite frankly at this point I don't really care anymore to convince the skeptics... If you want to do
something with this drop me a line and lets talk...
Yes the TOPS camera was designed specifically to record the 'plasma' sheath that would developed
No it was NOT unexpected...
No I do not believe they deliberately cut it loose because that would have been pointless and unnecessary and they would have better chance of
recording when it was still attached and working. It was simply NASA morons not putting in a safeguard and that is stated in the 380 page independant
report
Yes they had problems with it the first attempt... it was in the deployment mechanism...
"The first attempt at the tether experiment ended prematurely when problems arose with the deploying mechanism..."
www-istp.gsfc.nasa.gov...
The Tethered Satellite System Reflight (TSS-1R) builds on what we learned about tether systems during the TSS-1 mission, which was flown in 1992
NASA says now, the mission was a complete success. "Mission Accomplished" !!!!!!!
Was it a success? YES
"
Models, accepted by scientists for more than 30 years, are incorrect and must be rewritten. This assessment follows analysis by
a joint U.S.-Italian Tethered Satellite investigating team of the information gathered during the mission"
www.msfc.nasa.gov...
This is the last time I will post anything on this following issue... I have made several attempts to get some takes on the OTHER tether...
For those few who did pick up on it email me or U2U me and I will point you to the data. As it is still 'sensitive' and involves the OTHER SPACE
PROGRAM I will not be posting the info in the forum with all the links to MILITARY sites... which is generally not a good idea to hotlink to those
anyway
But there was another tether in the sky... it was there just after STS 75 returned home... and it was up there for a long time... Tracking this thing
down has lead me down a path that quite frankly frightens me... the sheer scope of this and the implications...
It has opened many doors I don't like what I see... like the HUNDREDS of laser 'cannons' NASA has around the world disguised as 'astronomical
research' including some in RUSSIA..
This other tether... they fired lasers at it from two of these... that are on military sites... No they are not attempting to shoot it down, though
they can do that easily... (and so can the Russians) they were testing the power transmission feature.
No I am not going to back that up with data right now...
Here is one picture of the tether taken from a ground station at Kirtland AFB... I picked this one as it also has a 'visitor' in it

You will note
that t is day 137. It is not attached to the shuttle... it doesn't need to be....
So Martyn Stubbs, a fellow Canadian... what shall it be? Or will you take those HOURS of film to the grave with you?
You have my email... and I will check the U2U's when I get time