It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Yes, and relying on the PD is basically a guaranteed conviction, innocent or guilty.
Notice it doesn't say "If you need a translator, one will be appointed for you".
Taxpayer money should never be used to fund translators for people who have had ample opportunity to learn the language of the law.
Originally posted by SRTkid86
reply to post by harvib
THAT IS WHAT OUR LANGUAGE IS
Originally posted by slackerwire
reply to post by harvib
Yes, and relying on the PD is basically a guaranteed conviction, innocent or guilty.
Originally posted by cRiTiC
Originally posted by slackerwire
reply to post by harvib
Yes, and relying on the PD is basically a guaranteed conviction, innocent or guilty.
This is true, from my understanding, PDs are only allowed to defend you for the specific accusation, they usually wont go above and beyond what they are required to do by the state especially if they think you are guilty.
Originally posted by harvib
Originally posted by SRTkid86
reply to post by harvib
THAT IS WHAT OUR LANGUAGE IS
Fair enough. However to understand your position please define "OUR". I would argue that what you mean to say is that it is your language.
Originally posted by harvib
reply to post by slackerwire
I see. So if somes fears are realized and Spanish becomes spoken by the majority will you hold yourself accountable for learning the new language of the land? Will you demand that when you are on trial that you are to pay for a translator?
Originally posted by BlackProjects
reply to post by ironman433
[...] So if working can we assume citizenship? Theoretically?