It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You do realise that most muslim countries women have the choice to wear a scarf or not?
Another prime example of political correctness gone mad, without being racist but how can they possibly not allow sniffers dog to come into contact with muslim passengers when theyre the most likely people to be carrying explosives ?!?!
Tell you what if you come near me I'll kill you, you're a prick who would kill an animal who doesn't know any better just because it comes close to you.
I don't want a dog near me, period! Is that so hard for you to understand?
Originally posted by poet1b
I have seen plenty of bomb and or drug sniffing dogs walk through the airports, and never do I see them sniffing peoples crotches. The dogs I see in the airports tend to be small dogs, beagle most often. Beagles are not an intimidating breed of dog. The dogs go along smelling peoples luggage, and only approach a person if they smell what they have been trained to seek out.
If more bomb sniffing dogs meant less security points, and less luggage searches, and faster processing, then I am all for it. No ones happy with all the changes in airport security because the what terrorists have done. Some people should know when not to complain.
Yet you're still willing to give up more of them for convenient travel. That's why the World is as screwed up as it is today. 50 years ago they'd have never got away with this crap, people would have rioted before submitting to tyranny.
Originally posted by poet1b
I didn't surrender any of my rights, they were taken away by fools who voted for Reagan and GH Bush long ago.
Originally posted by poet1b
Your history of attacking the poster when you have no reasonable logic to dispute what the poster is saying is well on display throughout the thread. I would be disgusted with your constant western bashing if it wasn't so humorous in how off base it is. Oh yeah, not all Muslim nations force their women to cover themselves in burkas, like Moracco, the nation which wanted to execute a woman for allowing a child to to name a teddy bear Muhammad. Not exactly a refute saying that not all Muslim nations oppress their women and treat them like property.
Originally posted by poet1b
By the way, there have also been Muslim women killed in the U.S. by their families for not wearing their burkas and their scarves, and for, OMG, dating a Western man. Yeah, most Muslims in the states and the rest of the Western world are fairly moderate, but denying those who are not, who take their religion too seriously does no one any good.
Originally posted by poet1b
Like I said, I would rather be sniffed by a dog than have to take off my shoes and be subjected to random search. Did you ever think that complaining about bomb sniffing dogs could easily lead to more intrusive ways of checking for bombs? It's a pick your poison kind of deal.
Originally posted by poet1b
Go back and look through the thread, where you blame the West for all problems with the Muslim world.
It is called denial. The following two quotes are beauties.
Oh and honour killing has nothing to do with islam!!
Then in the next post replying to my pointing out the Muslims who engage in honor killings;
Nobody is denying these things, but these bad things that are happening are rare!
BUT YOU JUST DID DENY THAT MUSLIMS ENGAGE IN HONOR KILLINGS.
If you paid any attention, you would notice that I have been very consistent with my complaints about the Muslim religion.
Originally posted by poet1b
It is called denial. The following two quotes are beauties.
Oh and honour killing has nothing to do with islam!!
Then in the next post replying to my pointing out the Muslims who engage in honor killings;
Nobody is denying these things, but these bad things that are happening are rare!
BUT YOU JUST DID DENY THAT MUSLIMS ENGAGE IN HONOR KILLINGS.
Originally posted by _Phoenix_
Originally posted by snowen20
reply to post by _Phoenix_
I actually agree on some level.
the truth is atleast from my perspective is that westerners are creating chaos by entertaining such things as this law.
in return the mass reaction is to become angry with Islam and therefor add fuel to the fire.
Look Islam did it again, Look islam has demands. In reality truth be known I think we are to blame for our own mistrust.
What Islam is doing now they have been doing for thousands of years, but now they fit the "PARTY LINE" of terrorist so westerners go along with it.
True, and it won't stop with islam, after they get bored with islam, something else will be next.
What was the big thing before 911?
[edit on 27-6-2008 by _Phoenix_]
Originally posted by LLoyd45Are you asking if I'm Muslim? The answer is "No". I'm Irish, Scot, Indian, and black by heritage. I was raised Southern Baptist.
Okay, you have my attention.. What cultural attitudes could I possibly of had that would make me dislike dogs instinctively? I can't wait..
Originally posted by Sonya610
Oh I knew you were not Muslim. Your opinion of dogs speaks of a limited exposure, and errrm...well...certain "cultural" attitudes which did not fit in with the image your avatar projects. But now I understand.
Originally posted by poet1b
Sorry, but Honor killings are a part of the Muslim culture. This is a fact.
All proud Americans celebrate the Fourth of July, Christians, Buddhists, Wicans, Spiritualists, Athiests, Agnostics, Scientologists. This is why it is not a Christian holiday, like Easter.
Only Muslims practice honor killings, except for maybe one other Middle Eastern religion, and they are not doing this in the Western world like Muslims are.
It is common practice that parents will reject their child should their child decide not to be a Muslim.
This is a very integral part of Islam. This is a fact about the practice of Islam. I am far more knowledgeable about this than you know.
This is at the very heart of why there will never be peace between Muslims and non-Muslims. This denial is not acceptable.