It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Thoughts on this photo

page: 2
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 28 2008 @ 09:30 AM
link   
I agree with above.
These are two balloons tied together. There are many pics on the net of similar.

For the first time, a very clear pic of an ufo
(or ifo perhaps)




posted on Jun, 28 2008 @ 09:42 AM
link   
reply to post by sherpa
 

I agree sherpa, looks to me like solar balloons.But why would they be tied together?Hmmmm....



posted on Jun, 28 2008 @ 09:50 AM
link   
reply to post by sherpa
 

hehe you beat me to it Sherpa. I recognized them right away.

They always prove to make for a mysterious photo though.



posted on Jun, 28 2008 @ 09:59 AM
link   
appologies for being blunt , but can we have :

date of observation
time of observation
location of observer
bearing of observation
map of area

these are basic things - where are they ?

i know quite a few paragliders - and weather conditions are CRITICAL to thier sport - so i do not believe that a real paralidger would not know exatly where he eas - when it was and the current metroloical conditions and such

so why do these usefull facts not accompany the ` report `



posted on Jun, 28 2008 @ 10:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by internos
Here's the full res photo (cropped)


I've started a thread in aircraft projects and alerted some experts in this very specific subject matter.

A full-size image can be found here:
Link

Bobcatrico, thank you for sharing the image


[edit on 27/6/2008 by internos]


Have you been asked to watermark it with the ATS symbol?

And who's Nick Bubb or whatever? I hope it's the guy who took the picture.



posted on Jun, 28 2008 @ 10:51 AM
link   
my thoughts - is that its utter twaddle

i have cropped and resized it



the vertical shape does not look anything like a real 3d oblect - it looks more like a inserted shape

the horizontal ` object ` is NOT a shadow of the vertical one - the topographry of the ground percludes that explaination



posted on Jun, 28 2008 @ 11:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by ignorant_ape
my thoughts - is that its utter twaddle

i have cropped and resized it

I take it you don't read the thread before replying.. Sherpa already identified the object there is no mystery here or attempt at deceit. Its just some solar ballons attached to one another.

No big deal.



posted on Jun, 28 2008 @ 11:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by triplesod

Have you been asked to watermark it with the ATS symbol?

And who's Nick Bubb or whatever? I hope it's the guy who took the picture.

Are you joking or what? lol Thanks for the laugh

I i shouldn't answer because you are NOT entitled to pose such questions but anyway ive been asked by the owner of the photo to watermark it: satisfied now?

LMAO



posted on Jun, 28 2008 @ 11:06 AM
link   
"Floating Pen Tool"


There are very specific Gliding and Ballooning areas clearly marked on Aviation Maps, so the coffee should stay on the tray


(yeah, balloon.)



posted on Jul, 1 2008 @ 03:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by internos

Originally posted by triplesod

Have you been asked to watermark it with the ATS symbol?

And who's Nick Bubb or whatever? I hope it's the guy who took the picture.

Are you joking or what? lol Thanks for the laugh

I i shouldn't answer because you are NOT entitled to pose such questions but anyway ive been asked by the owner of the photo to watermark it: satisfied now?

LMAO



And why am I not entitled to ask such questions? What an obnoxious attitude to take.

I apologise if you are offended by my question but I have every right to ask it, it appeared to me that a false claim had been stamped, all it would take would be you to tell me that that owner, in fact, ask you or give you permission to watermark it.



posted on Jul, 1 2008 @ 03:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by triplesod
I apologise if you are offended by my question but I have every right to ask it, it appeared to me that a false claim had been stamped, all it would take would be you to tell me that that owner, in fact, ask you or give you permission to watermark it.


No: Site owners are entitled to, or the MODS, or the owner of the photo: your question was implying something like i would have stolen the copyright somehow? Really, please ELABORATE what you think was my purpose when i added ATS watermark and the photo's owner copyright in it: and please explain why you are entitled to investigate about it and why i should give you attention.

Really, if it was a joke, then it was funny, if it was not, then of course is not an issue of mine.


[edit on 1/7/2008 by internos]




top topics



 
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join