Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
reply to post by SRTkid86
but yous ee, you are ingoring the article posted in the other thread regarding this, where she was quoted as saying it's not valid.
what did she say before that? Im curious?
Well since you don't know, ill tell you
In the State of Hawaii all certified copies of certificates of live birth have the embossed seal and registrar signature on the back of the
document." and since you dont know - here is the source
so her words up there are used to say "see its fake because there's no seal"
This post will point you in the right direction - to why you may not be
able to see the seal on obama's C.o.B.
but you probably didnt see that.
Now who's ALMOST got it?
[edit on 27-6-2008 by Andrew E. Wiggin]
did you not read the article, or did you just pick and choose what you wanted to quote.
here let me go ahead and put what you quoted into context for the people that aren't 100% up to date on this
Janice Okubo, Director of Communications of the State of Hawaii Department of Health, told Israel Insider: "At this time there are no
circumstances in which the State of Hawaii Department of Health would issue a birth certification or certification of live birth only
electronically." And, she added, "In the State of Hawaii all certified copies of certificates of live birth have the embossed seal and registrar
signature on the back of the document."
like i said earlier they don't issue ONLY electronic birth certificates, so if he has the REAL hard copy why doesn't he just show this and be done
also if you look on that wedpage they show what and ACTUAL hawaiian birth certificate looks liks vs. his
and on the REAL one there is a signature on it, and you can also very easily see the embossed symbol, yet strangely on Obamas you see neither of
also on a slightly LESS important note. you can see that the "scan" of his certificate has no crease which it would have to get if it were mailed to
him, because a document this size will not slip into your standard envelope. while the one that they scanned for comparison, you can easily see the
creases, like i said not quite as important but depending on how you view it, it shows that this was most likely never mailed to him. i know that when
i got my abstract of birth from california, they didn't send to it me in a large manilla envelope, it was in your typical sized envelope.
also another thing pointed out in the article is the fact that the picture is hosted on photobucket... you mean to tell me that the webmaster for his
website couldn't host the image on the same server that the website is on? he has to use a free and public photo sharing website to do that?
the scale itself is way off mark in comparison to the REAL one posted along with it as well.
look they have a scan of what a REAL one looks like, and they have one that shows what obama's looks like. if you can't see that something is
obviously wrong with his then i dont know what to tell you. it's obvious at this point that you guys are as bad as the majority of Ron Paul
supporters are. you will believe anything as long as it's in favor of your candidate, but if it isn't in his favor, you will almost stop at nothing,
and use every excuse in the book, to try and stick up for him
it's great you guys feel so strongly about this, it shows that not all hope is lost for the country, i just wish you would question things a little
more... even if you would hurt you make believe candy land vision that Obama is going to turn this into some kind of perfect utopia.
[edit on 6/27/08 by SRTkid86]