It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Flying Saucer Craft Developed!

page: 2
6
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 26 2008 @ 11:43 AM
link   
reply to post by '___'eed
 


I already made a thread about this *sigh*

flying saucer




posted on Jun, 26 2008 @ 11:46 AM
link   
It's the same technology "lifter" crafts use. You can build one yourself at home easily now, people sell kits. I didn't realize NASA invented the technology.



posted on Jun, 26 2008 @ 12:45 PM
link   
reply to post by KingIchigo
 


Actually VIKINGANT did the topic awhile back here.

But it probably doesn't hurt to have it in the aliens/ufos forum too.



posted on Jun, 26 2008 @ 12:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by mOOmOO
No such thing as a vacuum.


I have a vacuum sitting about 15 feet from me.


Anyway, this is certainly some new info to me. I am no big tech geek but I have heard about certain ionocrafts (SP?) before from a friend several years ago. We were going to build one but s*** happened so....

I will have my eye out for this test flight, would be cool to see a full scale model flying about.



posted on Jun, 26 2008 @ 01:14 PM
link   
I suspect that lifting capability is an issue for these craft or they would have been employed already considering the technology is well known. That being said, perhaps employing EMHD as a purely propulsive force may be the answer if the craft used a lighter than air gas for lift (hydrogen). Furthermore, one could use the hydrogen as an onboard fuel source to power the electrodes in the form of a fuel cell or something similar.

[edit on 26-6-2008 by ORIPEIA]



posted on Jun, 26 2008 @ 01:34 PM
link   
Whilst researching my hypersonic thread I came across alot of references to a MHD (magnethydrodynamic) powered MACH 50 craft.

It was an 'aerolense' shape, with what is called an 'airspike' to create a shock cone ion front of the craft so it essentially flying through nice calm air, not MACH 50 plasmafied air.

When was this developed ? 1954.

Here are the two pics.



and



So.... seems like the cats slowly but slowly coming out of the bag.

Reminds me of the time Ben Rich from lockheed martin told a group conference that 'we already have the technology to take ET home'.



posted on Jun, 26 2008 @ 02:37 PM
link   
Flying Disks are nothing new. I'm suprised to hear about this one though. I guess the gov't doesn't see much threat in Earth-based craft. Though there have been some purportedly built that COULD "fly" in a vacuum:

Ralph Ring & Otis Carr:
Ralph Ring is a brilliant innovative technician who as a young man in the late 1950s and early 1960s worked closely with Otis T. Carr. With the aid of his small team, Carr, who was himself a protegé of the great inventor Nikola Tesla, built a number of flying disks, which worked.... prior to their experimentation being forcibly terminated by government agents.
There is much more information on these disks and their inventors at:
projectcamelot.org...

There IS a group of scientists working on reproducing this incredible machine right now. Interesting times indeed if there are MULTIPLE flying disks being developed right now!



posted on Jun, 26 2008 @ 02:39 PM
link   
Is there are real photo of it somewhere, and not some junky "illustration?" I got illustrations of Buck Rogers' spaceships, too, but they ain't flying me anywhere.



posted on Jun, 26 2008 @ 02:42 PM
link   
That point on the saucer always made me think it was an
electrical terminal. A lightning arrester by Ben Franklin that
Tesla said a globe gets more hits. So on top of UFOs today
expect to see a globe. Surrounded by globes is an excellent
construction method as shown by Billy Meier's Wedding Cake
saucer. If you fly by static energy, use globes where possible.

It is getting too close to the 'free energy' solution.
If you have plasma, you don't need air or the MHD.
The ship is supported by Tesla's gaseous ether or 'dark matter'.
When NASA uses it they will most likely put in an atomic reactor.

PBS, lying for years about Nazi weapons and science, had a
NOVA spot with a scientist talking about the 'dark matter' maps
made in the universe.
Guess what he said.

The 'dark matter' pushed everything together.
Wow, that sounds like Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity (DTG),
or TDTG so to give credit where credit was always due.
Gravity between Earth and the Moon is a push on both from the
tiny inter atomic matter in all of space.

And flying saucers and FOO already exist.
NASA developed so they can have anyone build it.
Hopefully it will not be the first of the phony disc planes that
supposedly the Nazis had.



posted on Jun, 26 2008 @ 02:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by Nohup
Is there are real photo of it somewhere, and not some junky "illustration?" I got illustrations of Buck Rogers' spaceships, too, but they ain't flying me anywhere.


Well i understand that illustration wasn't detailed, just that it might give people an idea.

I found a video, using a simple device called EHD-FS v1.0 they have built and shown how it works, hope thats more useful to you


The video's a real media file.

Video.

And heres a link to EHD-FS v2.0

Video 2

And heres the link with all the details for V1.0

jnaudin.free.fr...

And details for V2.0

jnaudin.free.fr...


[edit on 26-6-2008 by Denied]



posted on Jun, 26 2008 @ 03:09 PM
link   
while it doesn't help the extraterrestrial flying saucer, it helps the local Vimana legends which my account for most sightings of flying saucers.

because of things like this turning up, I wonder if theres a kernel of truth in the 'subterranean' theories... you know, reptoids, molemen, hidden atlanteans etc. etc.

especially with all the finds of subterranean cities and so forth, and the disappearances associated with them....



posted on Jun, 26 2008 @ 03:16 PM
link   

This wouldn't be the first aircraft to fly using magnetohydrodynamics, said Anthony Colossa, a researcher at NASA's Glenn Research Center who is not involved in Roy's work.


What an arrogant statement to make!

Oh you made this? Ive seen better!

Thats called a one-up, and its completely disrespectful!

Its what I have come to expect from NASA (NAZI AMERICAN SPACE AGENCY)

This world is so corrupt


Anyway!

Great find!

Excellent thread



posted on Jun, 26 2008 @ 04:43 PM
link   
reply to post by '___'eed
 


I have a feeling that this thing will either be able to fly only 2 inches off the ground, or it'll just fail. Come on people, you think that they haven't perfected this tech yet? There are reports that the military has far more sophisticated aircraft than this. I mean, how long did it take them to trickle down velcro..



posted on Jun, 26 2008 @ 10:38 PM
link   
ok the thought of a flying saucer is crazy but is crazy enough to be true thats wut some poeple dont get the government is hiding it behind there backs but we try to look behind them and they get more and more poeple to block this huge secret and i personally think that there hiding all this UFO evidence underground just in case someone does get in



posted on Jun, 27 2008 @ 01:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by Denied

Originally posted by skywatch
i would like to see a picture/movie of his invention.


Well i had a look around and found this, seems there is a book out that people can buy, called How To Build a UFO.


But they show some sort of patent and drawings using Magnetohydrodynamics, maybe thats how it will look.

Picture taken from book below.



Source.



I hate to spoil your fun, butt....

Anyone can create a Patent about anything and the
best bit, it doesn't even have to exist. And if it doesn't exist
how can you prove it works. On the other Hand, if it does exist
and doesn't work you can't Patent it.

Anywho, gotta go and finish a Patent for this Project I'm
doing for Alan Parsons and his Frick'n "Death Star".



posted on Jun, 27 2008 @ 07:30 AM
link   
reply to post by LEAP STICK
 
Rocket technology is far from state of the art, it has been the obsolete red herring that NASA parades around to reinforce a false paradigm. Concerning the patent, please research the Biefield-Brown effect which was well known to the government in the 40s. Yes, they simply drop promising technology and look the other way.




posted on Jun, 27 2008 @ 07:43 AM
link   

Originally posted by Gazrok
Hmm...not sure why this is new. Thomas Townsend Brown was pretty well known for the same thing...with his lifters. He's already made (and demonstrated) working models.

en.wikipedia.org...

In addition, he worked for Dr. Vannevar Bush (whom many believe to be a founding member of MAJIC, or whatever other name you want to call it) and he worked for Glenn Martin (as in Lockheed Martin)...

Furthermore, Brown helped to found NICAP!

Check the links section on the wiki site....


yup, and there is an entire group of amatuers all over the world that have made these same scale models and they have there own anti-gravity web site. it's certainly not new...whats new is that someone is OPENLY COMING OUT WITH BIG BUCKS to build a prototype.

[edit on 27-6-2008 by jimmyx]



posted on Jun, 27 2008 @ 07:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by carole9999
reply to post by LEAP STICK
 
Rocket technology is far from state of the art, it has been the obsolete red herring that NASA parades around to reinforce a false paradigm. Concerning the patent, please research the Biefield-Brown effect which was well known to the government in the 40s. Yes, they simply drop promising technology and look the other way.



Sorry, Biefield-Brown effect is not a anti-gravity device
Will not wok in a vacuum.
It is just a wind generated by high voltage providing thrust and
if something generates thrust it's not anti-gravity.




top topics



 
6
<< 1   >>

log in

join