reply to post by RRconservative
No, I do not feel that everyone specifically who disagrees with the point of view I've expressed is an instigator, just you because you've replied
that I would try to profit via the Bilderberg Group's motives, while I have only the voting power in mind to stop them as the only reason to do this.
reply to post by Terran Blue
Terran Blue, thank you for understanding what I am trying to say here. It's a 100% legal way to wrest control from the company, IF
chose to do so.
reply to post by Shrukin89
While I agree with your comment about not supporting being chipped, as I am vehemenantly opposed to something like that, I can not agree with nor
condone blowing up the building for multiple reasons.
1) Who knows who might be killed in the process? It would be considered a terrorist action as well.
2) They probably manufacture these devices in some Thirld World country that the President will only try to "liberate" later anyway.
reply to post by disgustedbyhumanity
I do not think you know the definition of a lemming, let alone it being a mass panic decision I was alluding to.
1) Mass panic - Going to go get your guns, whick will only metaphorically let alone literally give the Government realistic reasons to kill you.
Giving them legitimate ammunition as it were to do what they want to do anyway.
2) Mindless rage - To attack because of sheer blind unintelligent thinking.
reply to post by LongTimeLurker
That is a completely thought provoking and interesting option you have there. I am not condoning it at this moment, but at least it's not something
silly like blowing the buidling up, or picking up a gun.
reply to post by Justin Oldham
JO, thanks for dropping in to say a few intelligent words. I appreciate that.
While, yes, what JO says would be in violation of T & C in conspiring to act together in conjunction, I am not advocating that either here.
What I am stating, is in fact, instead of picking up a weapon, instead of screaming revolution and instigating the Government into going into a policy
of sending in organized Law Enforcement to storm some building you are in, instead to intelligently think about healthy alternatives here.
If you have voting rights in the company, and they are voting on to give Government more control over it, you can veto that option, thereby negating
that action. It's your choice.
If you have voting rights in the company, and they are voting on to give the company to North Korea through Kim Jong Ill purchasing it, you can veto
that option as well. It's your choice.
The list goes on and one here. I think you might get the point.
I am not encouraging anyone to be stupid here and make an idiotic choice via actually stalking someone.
[edit on 25-6-2008 by SpartanKingLeonidas]