The Alien autopsy is real. , page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 24-6-2008 @ 07:02 PM by Badge01
There are several 'tells' as to it being a fake autopsy.

There's a place where one of the docs brushes the arm of the dummy and it shakes like a rubber appliance.

The autopsy procedures are not even close to real autopsy procedures. Just because something is 'alien' the methodology is the same.

The video is inter-cut in ways that betray the way it is made. Jump cuts, dissolves, and fade ins and outs. The camera type usually has a characteristic way the subject fades in and out when the film is stopped and started and this is not evident. The angles he uses are not done correctly to show the procedure but are obviously done to obscure important detail.

There's no reason for the doctors to be dressed like they are, especially the guy behind the window, isolated from the entire procedure. Note that he's wearing a full moon-suit even though he's not exposed.

There are a few more things, but that's off the top of my head, having done a analysis of it about 10-12 years ago.

Finally, if you read up on it Ray Santilli admits the film is a 'reconstruction' of the real film, saying that the original had degraded due to time and heat.

Wiki: Alien Autopsy (Santilli film)
Ray Santilli and fellow producer Gary Shoefield announced that their film was only partially real (a "few frames," in their words), while the rest was a reconstruction of twenty-two rolls of film, averaging four minutes in length, which Santilli had viewed in 1992 but which had subsequently degraded from humidity and heat.


He even goes so far as to detail how they made it using sheep parts:

According to Santilli, a set was constructed in the living room of an empty flat in Rochester Square, Camden Town, London. John Humphreys, an artist and sculptor, was employed to construct two dummy alien bodies over a period of three weeks, using casts containing sheep brains set in raspberry jam, chicken entrails and knuckle joints obtained from S.C. Crosby Wholesale Butchers in Smithfield meat market, London. Humphreys also played the role of the chief scientist undertaking the examination, in order to allow him to control the effects being filmed. There were two separate attempts at making the footage. After filming, the team disposed of the "bodies" by cutting them into small pieces and placing them in rubbish bins across London.[2]

HTH.

Guess this shows you should do a little research on stuff like this before you go posting things and irreparably damaging your credibility here.



[edit on 24-6-2008 by Badge01]


reply posted on 24-6-2008 @ 07:17 PM by argentus
reply to post by Alora



The demonity of your avatar puts me off, but your words ring true. What's a 50-year old phart to do?

Do red eyes=demon? unknown.

ergo, focus on the words and stop being a numbknutz.

Well said Alora ;o)+


reply posted on 27-6-2008 @ 02:34 AM by Xeros
It's no secret that the guys came forward and admitted it was a hoax. There was a whole documentary (not the movie) on how they did it includng people like the butcher who gave them the insides, the guy who made the dummy, various people involved. It was filmed in a flat in London and cost barely anything. They even showed a prop they had (that metallic alien hand plate thing)

Here we go, a quick search does the trick:-

On April 4, 2006, two days prior to the UK release of Alien Autopsy (a British comedy feature film on the subject of the footage), British Sky Broadcasting broadcast a documentary, Eamonn Investigates: Alien Autopsy, presented by Eamonn Holmes. In this program, Ray Santilli and fellow producer Gary Shoefield announced that their film was only partially real (a "few frames," in their words), while the rest was a reconstruction of twenty-two rolls of film, averaging four minutes in length, which Santilli had viewed in 1992 but which had subsequently degraded from humidity and heat. They said that only a few frames of the original were still intact by the time they had raised enough money to purchase it.[2]

Santilli and Shoefield stated that they had "restored" the damaged footage by filming a simulated autopsy on a fabricated alien, based upon what Santilli saw in 1992, and then adding in a few frames of the original film that had not degraded. They have not identified which parts are original footage.[2]

According to Santilli, a set was constructed in the living room of an empty flat in Rochester Square, Camden Town, London. John Humphreys, an artist and sculptor, was employed to construct two dummy alien bodies over a period of three weeks, using casts containing sheep brains set in raspberry jam, chicken entrails and knuckle joints obtained from S.C. Crosby Wholesale Butchers in Smithfield meat market, London. Humphreys also played the role of the chief scientist undertaking the examination, in order to allow him to control the effects being filmed. There were two separate attempts at making the footage. After filming, the team disposed of the "bodies" by cutting them into small pieces and placing them in rubbish bins across London.[2]

Alien objects, supposedly items recovered from the crash site, were depicted in the footage. These included alien symbols and six-finger control panels, which Santilli describes in the Sky documentary as being the result of artistic licence on his part. These artefacts were also created by Humphreys. The footage also showed a man reading a statement "verifying" his identity as the original cameraman and the source of the footage. Santilli and Shoefield admitted in the documentary that they had found an unidentified homeless man on the streets of Los Angeles, persuaded him to play the role of the cameraman, and filmed him in a motel.


en.wikipedia.org...

I hope you're talking about the same thing

[edit on 27-6-2008 by Xeros]


reply posted on 27-6-2008 @ 04:29 PM by Alora
Originally posted by argentus
reply to
post by Alora



The demonity of your avatar puts me off, but your words ring true. What's a 50-year old phart to do?

Do red eyes=demon? unknown.

ergo, focus on the words and stop being a numbknutz.

Well said Alora ;o)+


LOL- sorry. Perhaps cover that part of your screen with your hand next time? The eyes won't burn through your hand. Or will they *evil laugh*

Just kidding.

Anyway- on topic: Am I one of the rare ones who was broken hearted that this was fake? I thought we were actually making a large step foward. But alas, a hoaxster had to throw us a big step back.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Bob Lear on Brad Meltzers Decoded - UFO\'s
  Posted 12 days ago with 6 member flags
Bob Lazar\'s W-2
  Posted 7 days ago with 6 member flags
AREA 51 - Activity CAUGHT on (Fact or Faked Paranormal Files Show)
  Posted 17 days ago with 5 member flags
Underground base right in the heart of Portland, OR
  Posted 10 days ago with 5 member flags
"Images of Aviation - Area 51 - Peter Merlin"
  Posted 9 days ago with 4 member flags
Current generation military base video surveillance
  Posted 8 days ago with 4 member flags
Groom Lake night panorama circa 2003
  Posted 5 days ago with 4 member flags
Creech AFB comm changes
  Posted 7 days ago with 3 member flags